Re: ... these days I don't hesistate, I just take my toys and go
In this case it's Gitlab who's doing the throwing.
42698 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
PyPi and NPM, also mentioned in the article, are not, on the face of it, collections of random uploads. They present themselves as resources for developers in their respective languages. A user might reasonably expect them to be sources of high quality S/W. AFAICS the reality is that both collections simply accept contributions on trust with mechanisms to remove malware once the damage has been done.
Should you have the misfortune to fall victim to one of these, possibly as a result of a library downloaded by someone else acting in good faith, you might have occasion to reflect that there are worse problems than spelling variations although these are, in fact, at the very heart of typosquatting. You might even come to the conclusion that uploads should be vetted before being publicly posted. You might even use the term "curated".
PyPi's "terms of use" make no mention of not uploading malware: they're entirely concerned with an uploader having the rights to distribute the material. They make no mention of the terms on which material is provided to the downloader. Neither is there any mention in the code of conduct.
NPM is slightly better. The acceptable content, in its 3rd paragraph forbids malicious content. Perhaps reasonably this positions it after licencing considerations but both are placed after "harassing, inappropriate, or abusive".
But as commentards have pointed out below, there isn't enough of it. Not nearly enough. Not enough by several planets' worth. Fossil fuels have built up over geological time and they're being burnt in a few years. When it's gone it's gone. We need much smarter solutions than this.
This process would also require land. Anything harvesting energy from sunlight uses the land on which that sunlight falls. If a process produces something from waste products (why do you use scare quotes?) then the land has already been used in whatever process it was wasted from. You also need to consider how the waste might otherwise have been disposed of; waste organic matter is apt to give rise to methane if simply buried.
Back in the day I was using something called - IIRC - SDOS, or maybe SD/OS which was either a rebadged CP/M or a knock-off. It came with a system built on S100 boards from a company called SD. There seemed to be no difference at all from CP/M except for the name. We accumulated all sorts of freeware, even Algol (probably as a compiler) although the main language used was Microsoft FORTRAN.
The only time I was involved with DECNet the Ethernet addresses assumed that the NIC was made by DEC and hardcoded the DEC-specific part of the MAC. If you wanted to use DECNet on some non-DEC kit you have to overwrite the MAC. How is this handled these days when the NICs are anything but DEC?
We were using HP-PA hardware and first turned on the DECNet stack in the middle of the working day. This meant that all nodes using the HP server now had invalid addresses in their caches... The clamour from the users died down as their PCs re-synchronized.
The two paragraphs starting at "But take a system with a trained neural network." say pretty well what's the whole problem with this: trusting a black box to get the right answer. "But reproducibility is notoriously difficult in machine learning."
However the next bit: "You need access to the training data and other settings to recreate it. That becomes problematic if the data is medical or personal info, or proprietary" really suggests the solution to the conundrum. It's data that matters. It can be protected by copyright, assuming, that is, that the trainers had the rights to that data in the first place.
"The stuff in the media is that wee nuclear produces thirty five times more waste per kilowatt."
35 time more waste what?
The "what" matters. What are the characteristics: type of radiation, energy, half life, chemistry? Is this 35 times more bulk with traces of radioactivity or 35 time more radionuclides? Are we dealing wih elements that are easily immobilised or elements whose chemistry leads them to be leached out of whatever you might try to trap them in.
"more radioactive" is a vague term. It might simply mean that you have more of it - 2 tons as opposed to 1 ton. It might also mean, as you suggest, a short half-life. It could even mean higher energy or a more damaging form of radiation.
"More reactive" in the article is also vague. In what way? Does it mean a radioactive isotope that's chemically reactive or just something that's not radioactive but chemically aggressive? And why can't something that's "reactive" be neutralised by virtue of its reactivity; HF, for instance is very reactive but react it with Ca(OH)2 and you get calcium fluorite which isn't.
So you say what you want and somebody simply replies that they can do that you'll either (a) take them at their word and follow up even though a longer reply would have made it clear that they couldn't or (b) take pot luck out of them and the 50 other replies that say the same thing because you've no way of differentiating between them.
"apparently done as much with their life as the older in less than half the time"
If the older one hasn't done as much as you might expect that might be a cause for consern. But when the younger one has apparently done more than you might expect then you should consider their real talent might be in creative writing.
"gets the job done with as little fiddling as possible, Mint readily beats Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE, or any flavor of Debian"
I had Mint on a rarely used laptop which got a few steps behind current. In that situation I found the update process convoluted to the point of being broken. It was easier to do a new install rather then update in place. In the end I decided a fresh install of Devuan was less fiddly.
"why else would they always include that 'Read in Web Browser' button"
So that those who (as the senders see it) haven't worked out how to avoid reading emails in plain text won't be denied the opportunity to see the sender's latest brain fart in all its mult-icoloured, multi-font, flashing, Comic Sans glory. After all they took so much time putting it together it would be a shame to miss it.
Yes, marketing departments really think you're interested.