"Think of the LLM as Barbara Woodhouse"
The OP is now entering a query "Who's Barbara Woodhouse?" Or possibly, being a youngling with a modern education, "Whose Barbara Woodhouse?"
42396 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
An alternative view is that Reader was part of Google's strategy of suckering people in to use its web sites when perfectly useable alternatives exist. Apart from alternatives other commentards have already mentioned there is Thunderbird which, together with its relatives such as Seamonkey, gathers mail, RSS and Usenet into a single application.
Everyone with a really difficult task is apt to grab onto a "silver bullet" which promises to simplify it. There is no silver bullet, of course. In this case, if the corporate products were backdoored or withdrawn from the UK there's be a few under-the-counter alternatives to take their place. After all, the basic encryption libraries are out there and all it requires is some code - possibly iffy - to wrap it up for use. The nearest it would come to being a silver bullet is that it might be easier to get one or more backdoored under-the-counter products into circulation.
The downsides won't be the concern of those pushing the idea - that'll be another department. SEP. The temptation of the silver bullet is hard to resist.
I eventually ran out of banks to change to every time I took my account away from one that closed its local branch. What's worse, when I get to the not-really-local branch I find the counter staff have been disempowered, presumably to force customers to a crap online or phone "service". I regard proper back branches in the same light as backups: you might seldom if ever need them but if you do, you really need them.
Any bank that opens a branch convenient to me gets my account PDQ.
Yes, I wonder if Fonant was puzzled by the whooshing sound.
The critical point here is that if they think it's possible they should try to commission a proof of concept implementation that stands up to scrutiny. It's all very well their doing a lot of hand-waving but reality has to be faced.
I've said here many times that if people think the innocent have nothing to hide they should publish their online banking, trading and other dreds and see how that works out.
"and never trusted with power again"
You'd soon run out of candidates.
The only realistic manifesto would be "We'll sit tight and do our best to cope with events." because coping with events is what a government has to do. The last thing they need is to create even more events for themselves. As trying to do things ends up having unintended consequences which cause events sitting tight is the right thing to do when not occupied coping.
But (a) it's unlikely that the public would vote for that because most of the public each have some personal thing they want a government to do, (b) if the public did catch on that it was the right manifesto to vote for all parties would adopt it and (c) every party, particularly its Dunning-Kruger wing, has something it wants to do.
I started off forming a political law that any sufficiently large political party would acquire a Dunning-Kruger wing. I quickly realised that that did not match reality and eventually decided that any sufficiently large political party might, just possibly, acquire a non-Dunning Kruger wing).
until the 2008 crash (which was nothing to do with labour, rather more to do with bankers cashing in on events which events were a long period of cheap money and rapidly inflating property prices due to governments setting (or having central banks set) interest rates based on measures of inflation which ignored housing costs. Gordon Brown was not just the Chancellor responsible for that policy in the UK, he was an enthusiastic proselytiser, upbraiding countries which didn't join in. The GDP growth was a result of that and the 2008 crash was the eventual bill.
Thank you for ringing High Street Bank. We have been experiencing unusual levels of calls for the last ten years. You are 258th in the queue. Please enter your bank account number followed by hash. This will not remove the need for our agent to ask you for it when you get through.
"I suspect people have had to take them aside and explain things slowly and clearly."
The problem is that the people who are taking them aside and explaining things slowly and clearly are the ones who want back-doored encryption. They want to take short cuts in dealing with criminals. My experience - a third of my working life - is that there are no short cuts without risking the innocent in one way or another.
If this is implemented it will undoubtedly go wrong with a big scandal. Those pressing for it will be well hidden behind official secrecy. Those fronting it will be out of government if not out of Parliament; they'll get some opprobrium but neither will be very unlikely to suffer the penalties they'd deserve.
All "they" have to do is prove that it works. Come up with a proof of concept implementation. Use it themselves for a long enough period, say a couple of years, without getting hacked. Then introduce it into legislation. It's called "showing leadership" and if it's that simple and safe there should be no problem.
"Frankly, the only reason for contracts is to try to trap people in to a bad product,"
The T&Cs linked to above only say there's no long contract without defining "long". The T&Cs and the custoner's acceptance of them are the contract. Acceptance would appear to be implicit in using the service and paying for it.
I don't think it's being saved for for shareholders. In fact the shareholders have got exactly £1 from it. That's between them.
If it went had gone various UK firms banking with it might not have been able to pay their staff or their suppliers. Some of the unpaid suppliers may then have not been able to pay their staff or suppliers. The number of people potentially affected could be quite considerable. Who knows, you might have been one of them. Are you one of those rich people?
Ask not for whom the bell tolls./It tolls for thee. How does the next line go?
"you need direct control of the storage device"
My database engine was Informix which, at least on Unix boxes, allowed access to the character devices in /dev which is about the closest you can get without having the database engine include a H/W driver. Linux doesn't offer that although it does provide something close in terms of tweaking the block device (it's so long since I looked at this that I can't remember the details).
Although it's possible to use the OS's file system (reads and writes to files in /srv have the same semantics as devices in /dev) this was usually avoided for production systems except for earlier versions and what they called the Standard Engine.
"The people that are saying send the shoes to Turkey or somewhere where people don't have shoes or there has been a tragedy happening"
There is nothing in there that precludes donating them to a first world charity to raise money. In fact, the Beeb's report says "Adidas said it was considering selling the footwear and donating the profits to charity and had ruled out other options, such as burning them."
Of course they'll all end up in land fill one way or another.