Re: how can they do their job?
I'd go further than that. Any legislator planning to vote for this should publish all their online credentials, banking, email, trading etc. and then postpone the vote for a year.
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
One of our NI friends was in the greenfinches - women special constables t(hink PCSO with a smart green uniform). One day she was on duty with a patrol in Lisburn, our local town*, when they encountered an unoccupied car in a control zone, i.e. an area where it was forbidden to leave a vehicle unattended. A group of French visitors emerged from a nearby shop. They deployed the "No spik Eenglish" tactic & were allowed to get away with it. If I'd been passing I might have suggested, within earshot, getting the bomb squad in to carry out a controlled explosion, just to see if that prompted a rapid language acquisition.
* Yes, it's a city but I could never view it as an extremely pleasant small town.
"the company is fond of using techniques that allow Apple’s iOS and Google’s Chrome browser to read and enter incoming one-time passwords so that users have nothing to do to arrange authentication.....The percentage of inquiries involving forgotten login IDs or passwords has decreased by 25 percent "
So the thieves don't have to bother getting the password reset nowadays - hte phone is its own security.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/may/08/crypto-muggings-thieves-in-london-target-digital-investors-by-taking-phones
You'd think equals would be =
Nope. I'd expect it to be an assignment.
Greater than >
Nope, I'd expect it to be a redirection of output.
The first is a universal issue in languages, differentiating between an equality test and an assignment. The latter isn't universal but it becomes an issue in a language that has to deal with redirecting data flows.
The essence of the Unix approach is that the shell provides the control structures with very few builtins. All the heavy lifting is done by other programs; that puts them all on an equal footing, including any you might care to provide yourself.
"India's outdated and insufficient legal framework for protecting trade secrets."
OTOH there's something admirably forward-thinking about a supreme court which can set up its own Technical Committee to investigate its national government for illegitimate targeting of individuals. I can see why the US gvmnt might not like that. Not the UK gvmnt
"still we failed to notice that one of them ended up with the initials of a Personal Digital Assistant"
Although her forenames are unexceptional we should have spotted the significance of her initials. I think it caused a bit of an issue when a post-grad student was already a DR.
I'm sure if you search news reports hard enough you'll find reports from c 1980 of a police investigation which involved digging a trench near the practice tee of a Co. Down golf course (Crawfordsburn IIRC). It will include mention of police taking away samples in white plastic bags. In fact nothing of significance was found (it was one of several reports alleging buried bodies, all false) but it was like a golf ball mine. A lot of police officers were keen golfers and the bags were clear plastic, full of golf balls.
Back in those days the golf club restaurant served such delicacies as chicken in a basket....
There were two parts to the mobile venture. There was the network part, CellNet, and the customer facing part, BT Mobile, originally the merger of the phone, paging and voicemail services.
It was already growing rapidly when they split it off - remember it was a share split, not a sale so BT got no cash for it. Any competent telecoms management should have seen mobile had to be part of their future and faced down the naysayers. To get back in required giving Deutsch Telekom 1/8th of the business, probably a bargain but something that should never have been necessary.
As to cable, you're quite right, of course. It's something most critics forget when complaining about fibre - BT was compelled to make a very late start.
To say nothing of the fact that they decided they didn't need to be in the mobile market. The regulated bit always irked them. That's why they made disastrous investments in things they didn't understand because they thought there were fat profits in unregulated ventures.
At some point either the advertising budget runs out or manglement starts to take a look at what they get for their money. I suspect that right now there's an advertising bubble as the entire consumer side of the internet seems to depend on it and that it's going to get very messy when it bursts.
This has been explained a number of times but try this exercise.
Look at the things you own. Include any investments, pension rights etc. How much money would they be worth if you sold them? (For this purpose just take the present valuation less the outstanding amount of any loans taken to buy them.) That, plus any money you have in the bank or your pocket, is what you are worth in the way in which these personal valuations are made.
How much of that could you actually spend? Only the money in your bank and your pocket; this is what's known as liquid assets. You probably wouldn't even want to spend that much on a single purchase. If you wanted to buy something big you'd have to sell some of the other stuff or borrow against its value and possibly get some of your mates to chip in if it's something that they might want to share.
I find it amazing that they have to promise not to make mis-leading claims. Isn't making such claims illegal in the US? Or do US businesses only have to obey the law when they promise to do so?
TFA describes the states as suing Intuit. That's the source of the problem. A civil suit can be settled like this with no admission of wrongdoing; in a criminal prosecution the only way to stop it going to a full trial with witnesses giving evidence would be a guilty plea.
"what exactly can the two parts do when split that they can't do now?"
Ether:
Have a sum of share prices for the two parts a bit bigger than Elliot paid for their shares or
At least one of the halves can be bought up with a leveraged buy-out leaving Elliot with more money and somebody else with debt.
One of the remarkable things is that Elliot and their ilk seem to be able to offer what I assume they will insist are informed opinions on so many varied industries. If they're so smart one has to wonder why they don't generate their own product ideas and build up businesses to exploit them. Surely it couldnt be that breaking things is easier and requires less knowledge than building them?
The enzyme evolved in bacteria in the wild, presumably in temperatures <30C, so forget about the risk of escape. For an industrial process the less the energy input the better so as low an optimum the better. It may well be, of course, that although the wild-type optimum may well be higher although it can work at ambient temperatures.