"but I'd still have to invest masses of time to convert"
If you have the space you could install Linux as a dual boot and try running your Windows essential stuff in Wine.
42420 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"After 2-3 years grace period, you can announce that this function will be going away in a future version. If you really need some legacy app you can always load up a copy of Windows in a VM on your own."
Sometimes those legacy apps are the sole reason the computer was bought. They're the ones that control horrendously expensive H/W whose cost still hasn't been amortized and the app authors have long since closed the business.
The usual reason for Linux not working on some H/W is that it's too new and the distro hasn't caught up with it yet. This is particularly the case with very conservative distros such as Debian and derivatives such as Devuan. The solution there is to install Mint, wait until the new release of your preferred distro or just buy non-bleeding edge H/W which is likely to be cheaper. The opposite side of that coin is that you will be supported on H/W at which Windows has long since turned up its nose.
If I'm already running Linux WSL is meaningless but I suppose from a Windows PoV it's a step in the right direction. Terminal? - had that for years. Chromium Edge? - no thanks. Sandbox? - dunno, is that something like chroot? DoH? - wazzat, Department of Health? I gather, however, that you now have options of tabs in your file manager and that somewhere along the line you also got multiple desktops but that's just playing catchup.
If you go through a doorway you end up beyond it so obviously "through that date" must obviously mean "beyond that date". I'd hope that an English court and jury would interpret it that way if it came to a breach of contract.
And are there any videos of top MS management saying Windows 10 will be the last version? Deepfakes excluded, of course.
We had the lift shaft problem with our Z8000 Onyx back in goodness knows when.
These either side of the wall stories remind me of Feynman's which, of course, is one up on the rest of them: visiting Oak Ridge and discovering the enriched uranium being stacked up in the required small lots but back to back against a wall.
There are more ways than static to generate high voltages. The microspectrophotometer had a Z80 S-100 box attached and, for fluorescence work had an XBO (xenon) light source with a stabilized PSU that provided a hefty pulse to strike the arc. We learned to turn on the light before powering up the X80 box.
"We are making brand changes as we're at an inflection point in our client roadmap in preparation for the upcoming launch of our Meteor Lake processors."
"We will provide more details regarding these exciting changes in the coming weeks."
I'm not sure about Patel's point, however. i5, 10th Gen (which is what the label stuck on this laptop says) is probably just a meaningless cluster of letters and numbers to the general computer-buying public. Their concerns, at least regarding laptops, are more likely to be "What's the screen size?", "What does it weight and how thin is it?" and above all "How much is it?". Personally I'll admit to the first and last of these along with "Can I buy it without Windows?".
I suspect some think it possible and some don't. Some get into the life peerage due to being good at something even though most are refurbished ex-MPs and hangers on. Personally I'd like to see the presidents or equivalent of the the chartered institutes being ex officio members.
But as to anonymous age verification and safe back-doored encryption the same test applies: commission a proof of concept implementation and then let the experts take it apart.
Lawyers are disinterested to the extent that they'll just as readily represent you or your opponent providing their fees are being paid. They may also advise you as tot he strength or weakness of your case but when it gets to court the case they put will be the case they've been briefed to put. Privately they may believe it or believe it to be all bollox but they'll put it to the court to the best of their ability and with a straight face.
None of whom are likely to have any knowledge of biological or medical science. But that's true of most investors and the domains in which they invest. The system depends on honesty when the investment is offered. I could envisage a less extreme case where the investors do have some knowledge and the project looks sufficiently feasible but isn't.
"no time travelers to say which one was right"
It didn't need time travel, it needed a bit of vision and a lot of application. Those are things senior management are paid to provide. Plenty of people had the vision about one innovation or another and succeeded. It was Xerox who had the best opportunity who didn't.
The management certainly didn't realise how much money they could have made themselves. Once others were making the money I don't think they'd have dared realise how much they lost. The risk of shareholders suing them into oblivion would have been too great if anyone had put a number on it.
"Any system of Proportional Representation would have forced sensible compromise government for as far back as you wish to look"
I remember having that hope when PR was introduced in N. Ireland.
It didn't work out that way. Instead of the moderates such as Alliance coming to the fore it meant that eventually even the existing sectarian parties were pushed aside by their more extreme rivals.
45 years takes us back to 1978. It includes the time that Gordon Brown spent getting us into a big financial hole under labour. I also remember the years that lead up to 1978 and the winter of discontent as it was called. No party in my lifetime has had a monopoly of governing the UK badly.