Re: With two-faced "friends" like Dyson, Britain doesn't need enemies
"Would any of them as President really be an improvement"
I can't think of anyone in the UK I'd vote for as president.
42420 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
There's a good reason for that type of consultancy.
High salaried manglement want to know what's going on in the business and how to improve it.
They could look at the watch - i.e. ask the workers ho know.
But workers aren't paid very much
And the high salaried manglements aren't going to encourage the view that the value of anything is might not be the same as its price.
What to do?
Simple, commission a consultant who can borrow the watch - i.e. talk to the workers - write up what they said and present it as a reassuringly expensive report.
Problem solved.
Nevertheless I had to go over to my cousin in law's today to update her Zorin,* It doesn't actually look that much like the W7 that had been on there originally. It would be easier to knock up a more convincing Windows look-alike for any version of WIndows with KDE. It's distros like this that save us the bother. Having read Liam's review earlier I did idly wonder whether I should have burnt a DVD & done a fall reinstall.
* All she actually needed was an update to Firefox because she couldn't get John Lewis & M&S to work but it seemed best to do the lot.
But what is it with a lot of sites recently (Screwfix, I'm looking at you too) that have caused them to start throwing "Application error: a client-side exception has occurred" if they don't like the browser? It's a case of being too clever by half but not half clever enough. Nevertheless I doubt Screwfix would turn away customers for wearing the wrong brand of boots or John Lewis for carrying the wrong brand of handbag so why put obstacles in the path of online customers?
It depends on what you regard as a step back - or maybe the value you put on the step forward.
My objection to vim dates back to my very first encounter. I wanted to remove the carriage returns from a file which originated on Windows. Opened the file in vim and saw....no ^Ms at the end of the lines!
Some unfortunate default in a config file obviously but my reaction is simple: if it can hide that from me what else can it hide? It is not to be trusted. Far simpler to go back to the real vi, which, in effect, nvi is rather than learn the ins and outs of vim's "imrpovements" when I'm not going to trust it.
Trust is hard to gain and easy to lose. As far as I'm concerned vim lost it instantly on first contact and, as vi is all I want, it just isn't going to get the chance to regain it.
"Vim is preinstalled for Stockholm Syndrome sufferers"
That's what I think of vim users too. One of my first moves is always to install nvi.
But ksh - that's really a blast from the past. I don't suppose they've also unwound Ubuntu's idea of there being only a single user password to get root privileges via sudo? Having one user PW to log in and a different one to gain root is just basic 2FA.
I take it you've never had to deal with architects, especially not in the design of laboratories and the like.
One architect's career was jump-started by her winning an architectural prize for a fire station in an industrial complex. The Beeb had a fireman review it, I think in the course of the programme covering the competition. He explained how it was not very functional as a fire station to the point of being dangerous. Firemen have to run through fire stations very quickly on occasion. There were hand-rails with unprotected ends that were hazardous to someone coming round a corner and possibly running into them. It wasn't used as a fire station for very long. Nevertheless it won her the prize.
My own experience of this was with an architect who liked the idea of windows meeting at the corner of the building so that the wall above appeared to be floating without support. I suppose it wins admiration from his fellows. My boss's corner office got that treatment. It wasn't actually a very big office - we needed to maximise floor space for the labs. Consequently it didn't have very big windows. The magic corner window effect was achieved by a supporting column just inside. With smallish windows substantially blocked by a column there was little light coming in although I suppose the heat loss was unchanged. Oddly enough my boss, by virtue of having another office in another department he covered, didn't spend much time there. But it looked great if you liked that sort of thing. Ever since, if I see that sort of design I wonder what internal bodge in in place to make it happen.
A desk tidy for several different sizes of Post-It notes. There are no known sizes of Post-It notes that fit it.
OTOH, this being on the early days of mobiles, I was in an office with a shop on the ground floor. The carrier bags were considered wonderfully cool for the kids to take their stuff to school in.
A requirement of mine is that the stick be easily removable from the key-ring when required. One reason being that having the weight of a big bunch of keys is not good for the connectors. Another might be that the bunch of keys makes it too conspicuous.
A further requirement is that when not in use the connector should be protected from pocket lint.
"The Data Protection Review Court is a mechanism put into place by the US to give European citizens the same right of redress they'd have at home."
There's a very simple principle that would sort this out. Irrespective of where the data is wrongfully accessed the redress should be between the data subject whoever accepted the data initially and in the jurisdiction of the data subject as if it had happened within that jurisdiction. While a business can't reasonably be held responsible for the actions of some other jurisdiction they can be held responsible for exposing data to such actions. How they do that is their problem but if the incentives are there they'll do it.
"That means nothing to the head-bangers in the Conservative Party."
Not exclusively in the Conservative party - think Farage - and not entirely affecting the entire party. If you want an explanation all you have to do is remember that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel. If you want to attract support all you have to do is conjure up an enemy without; it doesn't have to be an enemy without your country, an enemy without your trib is sufficient (think N Ireland). That will bring a host of the gullible who'll not realise that the power you gain (or "take back") isn't power they'll have, nor even power that will be used on their behalf. It'll quite likely be power that used to their disadvantage.
Correct up to a point but the real shortcoming of GDPR in both the EU and UK is that all it does is enable someone to make a complaint. There's nothing about pro-active enforcement in any jurisdiction, at least as regards individual give-aways. That's why we rely on Max Schrems.
Ageed. The suit needs to be against who you gave the data to in the first place and in the jurisdiction where the initial transaction took place. If the costs of that are sufficient deterrent then the data should never get within reach of the US, not even via the CLOUD Act.
I still think a lot of small claims would be the best way to discourage them. Death by a thousand cuts. A small claims route means that even if they send a heavy weight lawyer to contest it they can't get their costs back if they win, they wouldn't be able to set a precedent so they'd have to defend them all or concede and if the sort of numbers which would interest a class action lawyer were to do that every year they couldn't really afford to throw money away if they were going to lose regularly.