Re: choose how the OS will annoy you
And yet if their vendor changes the way those apps work they'll just get on with re-learning them.
40485 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
OK, here's a suggestion.
Take this list: Mint, Zorin, Kubuntu. Try running each as a "live disk", i.e. running from a DVD, thumb drive or SD card. If you don't like any of these options try some of the other Ubuntu variants or MX, Mandriva or whatever. Try all 3 Mint edistions, Cinnamon, Mate and Xfce.
You can download isos of each of them. I know from recent personal experience the first two offer live disk functionality and have no reason to doubt Kubuntu does. Unless you're looking to install onto something ancient you should take the 64 bit option.
Burn each one in turn to whatever drive suits you and your device. There will be enough instructions on the net as o how to do this under the OS you're currently using.
Boot from the drive and select live if it offers live and install options (Zorin offers a choice, Mint boots to a live session with install as an option from that). Running like this will be slower than running from a real install; for one thing you'll probably be running from a compressed image of the real OS and/or an in-memory image which will cut down on the available memory.
Get to know the S/W. Find out how to connect to your network. There'll be introductory videos online to suggest things you might try. Find out if you can tweak any settings to your liking.
Decide which one you get on with best. Only you can decide that for yourself, I can't do it for you, nobody here can. Install that.
"Linux is for people who like to break things."
As opposed to people who want things broken for them and therefore choose Windows?
No thanks. I want an OS that enables me to do things without breakage and that's Linux.
"ChromeOS excluded. All our older family members should run ChromeOS on ChromeBooks so that nothing ever breaks."
If all you want to do is use somebody else's computer via a browser, that's fine to do a limited number of things. However as one of the older family members that wouldn't suit me (neither does your blatent ageism). Self & wife run Devuan (an old MSI is on Mint + KDE). A couple of cousins-in-law are on Zorin.
Rather than an "interesting" system, Popl_OS I'd have included Zorin.
One thing about Mint and Zorin (maybe also Ubuntu but it's a long time since I looked at that) is that both really need a reinstall to update from one major version number to another so it's best to install with a separate /home partition. I wish this was the default install option.
By contrast IME Debian and Devuan have succeeded in making major version upgrade in place work for some time now. It does require manual juggling of repositories however.
"The current government is mostly blind to storage and incentivising it, because in a free market, storage reduces the ability of wholesalers to profiteer off price spikes."
Governments are largely blind to anything that takes longer than the life of a Parliament.
"We don't need to get rid of guns, we need to keep a handle on nutcases."
It's the combination of both is the problem.
Here's one idea to think about. Make it illegal to own a gun if not carrying unlimited public liability insurance for gun ownership. Require issuers of such insurance to be licensed to do so. It then becomes up to the insurers to vet their customers for nutjobness. They have a better incentive to do it properly rather than some rubber-stamping public official. The requirement for the insurer to be licensed is to prevent someone setting up a shell company which can go bankrupt if anyone makes a claim.
For avoidance of doubt the real purpose of this is not to make shooting someone a commercial transaction but to ensure that gun owners receive substantially more than a cursory check and to impose financial deterrents (the annual premium for an assault rigle might be more than the value of your house).
"My home backups take place ad hoc, since the backup server doesn't run 24/7. I power up the latter and run the script when I think of it."
I recommend a Pi, a large USB drive and NextCloud with the NC client software set up to sync all the directories where you might put things. The server has an area shared with SWMBO so that when I put together her class notes PDFs she can see them to email out to the class.
I still recommend backing up your /home partition or whatever other location your OS keeps your data on before doing anything drastic.
"kept the transactional data during the day allowing much finer backups if required (they weren't)"
But this is why we do backups including the transactional logs. You do them in case they're required for production. A restore to a test system is a bonus. You always hope they never will be required but it's knowing you can do a resotre up to the last checkpoint or, preferably, up to the last commit that lets you sleep at night.
It's an interesting concept. What do you do in the event of a legal requirement to remove some data, for instance a data subject right ot be forgotten request?
It's the potential of destruction of media, or even the entire H/W that needs to be dealt with. Before I moved into IT I'd had the experience of my workplace being bombed (fortunately not very effectively) and burned (rather more effectively) so my subsequent thinking was more in terms of getting regular backups into a fire safe and preferably off-site.
We keep coming across these things.
Backup consisted of an overnight copy to the hot standby at the other end of the site. I don't remember the details - maybe it was a change of permission that allowed/disallowed read access to the backup UID - but the backup would be terminated before the morning shift started. For a very long time the overnight slot hadn't been long enough for a complete copy and nobody had checked...
Fortunately this was belt and braces - there was also a tape copy but I'm not sure the tape formats were compatible between the two machines.
Stephen, whether he liked it or not, was, in effect, the DBA for the system. After all, there was nobody else in that role. That applies to anyone else in that situation.
In that situation he needed to acquire the two essentials. No, not what you're thinking, definitely not those.
1. The required level of paranoia. (Extreme)
2. Detailed knowledge of what he's doing.
Note the order.
The database is the equivalent of all the paper records the business might have had otherwise. Operating on it is the equivalent of opening all the filing cabinet drawers and peering into them with a lighted candle in one hand and a jug of petrol in the other.
"Oh well, someone else will come along and create a new virtual management landscape. Some day."
Fairly soon, I'd guess. There'll be a good few ex VMware developers on the job market. It's a pity that it corresponds with a downturn in tech share prices so it might be harder to get investment. However they can point to a burgeoning POBB market: Pissed Off By Broadcom.
The IT departments might also have ideas and those might not align in the long term.
From an investment PoV I can see the attraction of a business that simply turns in regular income without too much fuss - I'm a pensioner after all. But for a reliable income I'd want that business to be able to be reliable in the long term and in a tech environment the risk of losing place must be considerable.
They're going to cut down on R&D. What good news to competitors. Not only do they now have a chance to leap-frog the market leader they have access to market-leader's ex-staff who might have a few ideas they weren't able to follow up. Some of those ex-staff might be even have been senior staff pissed off at seeing their budgets cut.
Also those 600 customers aren't in a vacuum. There will be other customers. potentially equivalent to those 600 they're ignoring which is a loss of profits in itself. They'll be going to competitors. Then a senior management at one of the 600 leaves and his replacement comes from outside that magic 600. The products he's familiar with are different and they'll be what he gradually moves his department to. Suddenly the business whose products are those you'd never be fired for buying becomes one that's circling the drain. Does it sound familiar?
Why would the profits be rising? OK, they make a one off cut of costs. Profits rise as a corresponding one-off. Then they don't. They've defined their market and are limiting any revenue increases to what that market wants to buy.
I suppose from top management's PoV it's Phase 1 of what will be a good strategy if they can pull it off. Phase 2, of course, is to become heroes a second time around by breaking out of the corner they deliberately painted themselves into with Phase 1.
"If their top customers are staying with them, those who generate most revenue, it won't matter."
The potential 600 + n customers who get as big as their top 600 will be going elsewhere.
I'm sure there will be investment managers doing the same as you - nodding and saying "Good idea. Cut costs." After a few quarters they'll be saying "Why is your customer base shrinking?".
"Set-up an automatic rule on the firewall to send off an email with PDF attached for each port scan."
This, definitely. Sometimes it's best to let fools experience the effects of their folly.
It's a long time since I even bothered to look at where the scans on my home router were coming from but as I remember, at that time, it was mostly India.
"Suggest to phone scammers that they are immoral in trying to defraud vulnrable people"
Just ask them to hang on a moment while you deal with someone at the door. Put the phone to one side & hang it up 10 minutes later. That keeps them out of mischief for a few minutes. It also seems to get you on a phone spammers' black list.
"Well, a lot of automated confirmation emails are sent as "NoReply" (when you complete a transaction or some such)."
A good rule of thumb is that if you are in business and send out an email to a customer expecting the recipient to read it you should be prepared to read any reply. It's no more than courtesy to your customer, even in the situation you describe.
If you spam your customers you should certainly expect complaints and deal with them if only to apologise. Of course the snowflakes in marketing don't want tohave their bubble burst by being reminded of how unpopular their tactics are. Even less do they want the risk of of someone higher up the food chain deciding to review customer feedback and finding just how much they're damaging their employer's reputation.
In the accounts department it's written off as "the cost of doing business".
I don't think fines can be written off as a cost of doing business before tax. OTOH these cases seem to be civil cases and settlements are paid. They may be treated differently to fines.