Re: Unplugged from the Internet: Not a Workable Option for Many New TVs
"Your Internet connection is not working properly"
Oh, yes it is.
42665 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I'm not sure about this. Where data sovereignty becomes a concern US software and services are being looked at askance. If big user categories - governments, for instance, take the view that stuff has to be run on non-MS platforms then this is going to rsult in
a) It's not longer what people have to use
b) It's not a preferred platform to drive expensive equipment. Existing users will be stuck with it but many of them will already be stuck with unsupported versions of Windows.
c) Application vendors will be presented with a changing market to which they will need to adapt or lose to competitors who do.
d) People are discovering there are options.
The days of sticking it to the user base may be on the way out.
Despite my long established position of preferring Linux and anything FOSS to Microsoft and anything propitiatory I think it's possible the message may really have got through. I thought the fact that Suleyman was moved a few weeks ago might have been significant, that he was the one behind the push of Copilot into everything and that being promoted to look for "superintelligence he was being moved somewhere where he couldn't do any more damage but they'd just not told him.
They can't be unaware of the digital sovereignty trend that's appearing outside of the US and that it will be a push towards FOSS. They may also realise that home users are increasingly being set up with one or other FOSS office suites on their new Windows laptops. The increase in H/W prices - ironically driven by the AI they've been so keen on - is going to dampen the replacements that the W11 games were supposed to have stimulated and that may lead to existing PCs being refreshed with Linux installs. All of a sudden the market's belief that nobody got fired for buying Microsoft is looking a bit frail.
What are you on about? This is a project which has been funded and underway for some time. But as an upgrade to the LHC it means that equipment has to be removed from the LHC and new equipment installed. This isn't the first time there's been a long shutdown for an upgrade. It's not planning delays, it's huge, complex instrumentation being built on-site in place of the previous generation of equiptemtnw hich has to be removed so it can't be kept running in the interim.
A better way of looking at it is that this is a massive framework built nearly 40 years ago which keeps getting repurposed to carry out new eperiments to keep it at the forefront of science These repurposings are seriously non-trivial. If it were a DC rack you'd not be surprised to find that occasionally the old boxes were taken out and new ones put in and that the replacement takes as long as it needs- the difference here is that the replacement takes a few years.
"The takeaway from Iran's tactics is that adversaries are likely to combine precision weapons with cheap, mass-produced drones to overwhelm air defense (sic) systems so that the precision weapons can get through"
Aren't there people whose job it is to work out stuff like this in advance instead of waiting to discover it from experience?
Time is the critical factor here. Turning a draft RFP into a real one takes time. The proposals have to be evaluated. Questions have to be asked of them. Questions need to be answered. At some point it becomes too late to award a contract before Trump's out, hopefully replaced by someone in possession of some marbles - maybe even a full set.
"My law authorizing and funding the Space Shuttle Discovery's movement to Houston is being set into motion thanks to NASA's announcement, and I applaud Administrator Isaacman for keeping this process moving."
His law? I thought it was the US's law but it's generous of him to take responsibility. In the meantime, if he believes all that I suppose there's a queue of people with bridges to sell him.
And isn't this turning out to be a particularly good Register Monday morning?
Could you flesh out the arguments here? If you're blaming him for holding the referendum you have to bear in mind that (a) he was a remainer and (b) it was a compromise forced on hum by the nutjob wing of the party. If that's the case you should apply that to the nutjob wing. There are certainly objections to his behaviour but I wonder if you've properly worked those out. They're not obvious in your rather abrupt comment.