It depends very much on the proportion of candidates who were men and the average number interviewed.
Take an example where the candidates were 50/50. If only one candidate interviewed* then an unbiased average would be 50% of interviews to be exclusively with men. If 2 candidates were interviewed then 25% would be exclusively men - and 25% exclusively women and 50% one of each.
Depending on the mix of candidates and number of candidates interviewed 37% might be about the expected, substantially more or substantially less.
However I'll stick my neck out and suggest that the people writing PR stuff and claiming an understanding of statistics is less than the number of people writing PR stuff and claiming to have an understanding of statistics but who actually do have an understanding of statistics
* There's nothing to indicate such a practice so the possibility can't be excluded from the interpretation.