Re: Kathy Burke said it best...
Oops. "with whom".
42273 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Odido's business deserves to suffer on account of holding passport and driving licence numbers in the first place. These are surely not necessary for providing a telecoms service. However as customers have provided this data they must be OK with it unless Odido made them a requirement in which case they would appear to be in breach of GDPR.
Productivity is a measurement of output per head. In order to measure it you need a good metric of output. Devising that requires thought. Capturing the metric also requires thought.
Keystrokes are not a good metric of output. They're not a metric of output at all. They're a metric of input. Someone using them as a metric of output in place of doing the work of finding something that really does the job (in this case, something related to monitoring of calls as far as can be told from TFA) is the one who is actually "making it appear they were working when they were not." Perhaps they should be fired.
What's more it would appear from TFA that this pseudo-activity was a device for keeping the computer from going into sleep mode, thus blocking an activity which appears not to have required key inputs. She appears to have been given a device which was not intrinsically fit for purpose and been fired for fixing that.
"Do you really believe VC's would supply this kind or money and having no say in the company's direction?"
Of course they have a say. The say will likely be not to put that money at risk (and more than it already is!) with the legal consequences of unrestrained use by the likes of Hegseth, especially if that use is against US citizens. Just think of all the class actions.
Freelance I had a couple of gigs a few years apart running UAT for application server upgrades. It might have been a coincidence but I'd worked on development of the application a decade or more previously. The application was character based and the client was running thin clients with a separate terminal server. By the time we got round to the second upgrade someone -possibly the terminal server company, had put together some sort of layer that took the terminal control codes to turn it into a GUI interface although the users were told not to use this.
The morning of go-live on the new server everything was working as expected and I was about to go home when I was called back. Performance had collapsed. It didn't take long to find out who'd switched to the GUI terminal setting in advance of the beefed up terminal server that was due next week.
"But virtually all other Linux Distros will do the job just as well."
Zorin & Mint are supposed to be the most Windows victim friendly so that's what I quoted. Personally I think anything running KDE would be preferable as there are plenty of cosmetics to make it look like W10. The unfamiliarity would be sensible menus, the fact that updates appear to be broken because they install so quickly and the lack of advertising.
The OS's function is to run applications. The applications' functions are to allow the user to do stuff. As you, williamyf, know quite well as you've told us of your excellent work in using Linux to make computing available to those who would not be able to afford it, it the being able to do stuff that's important.
"To put it bluntly: the average person doesn't care about their OS, unless or until it changes to one they're unfamiliar with!"
OK, let's assume this average person has a W10 laptop that can't be upgraded.
Would the Zorin GUI on their old laptop be less familiar than that on a new W11 laptop?
And which would cost them money?
They could consider a special edition - as a new purchase of course, for older H/W. OTOH if the extended support wheeze brings in enough money they wouldn't want to kill that and, of course, it establishes the practice of Windows as and annual subscription, preparing the way for Windows 12.
“How does it know it got the right answer? Because the outcome is measurable inside the same platform, Did the ticket resolve? Did the workflow complete? Did the approval get the right sign-off?
The fact that a ticket is closed doesn't mean it got the right answer. They'll discover that when an attacker gets a password reset or access authorised.
This just confirms my choice not to use Windows nor even the Linux version of Edge. It is beyond my comprehension why Windows users, or at least those who know there are alternatives, continue to tolerate this abuse. Yes, I know - this thing for which you think it's essential or that thing. But do they really justify putting up with it all?
"We've had speech to text programs for donkey years."
OTOH they produce some odd results. Maybe text to speech with AI adding a first correction pass prior to the human making a second pass. If AI adds to the human checker's work rather subtracting then it can be eliminated.
"there isn't a docking port to attach a Dragon to"
Provision has been made for this. From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-125 (the last service mission):
"The crew also installed ... a soft-capture mechanism that would aid in the safe de-orbiting of the telescope by a robotic spacecraft at the end of its operational lifespan."
"Many Linux desktops that people like are ugly"
Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. I might agree with your aesthetic choices, others won't. That's what's good about multiple choices. Unfortunately those stuck in the rut of one OS, one aesthetic can't even see over the edge to realise it doesn't have to be like that, not even when their OS maker of choice keeps forcing new ones on them every few years.
On your other point, it is possible to buy kit with Linux pre-loaded but you have to search for it.