Re: The same applies to country flags
They might avoid calling it country.
40557 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"a Peterbilt of printing"
I think that needs explaining for those of us on this side of the pond although I suppose the sentiment can be grasped.
For the wider point I haven't seen any such problems with my Brother printer. It accepts 3rd party cartridges without complaint.
I can't help feeling that if SCO hadn't imploded Microsoft might never have got a hold of the small business server market. A small SCO box - vastly underpowered compared to a small server of today - ran many businesses. I supported a few of them. Usually they had an industry-specific multi-user application. I've encountered a business deploying a general purpose sales order/stock control system (not exactly rocket science) in two branches; property management and rental; two print-shop management and accounting systems, one of them with three in different branches and general purpose accounting packages. Generally they were powered by Informix although I've also met Ingres.
"so suddenly we have to deal with formatting issues between MS and Libre"
Maybe things have changed but my experience back in the day was that there were formatting differences between MS & MS.
Having worked through a few books written with Office but using LibreOffice I think a lot of issues are to do with dire user practices, especially using tabs and spaces for layout where a table or even enabling flow round an image would be better. And the allegedly cropped images which were just masked...
"It would have been interestign to see how Munich would have managed during the pandemic, if they'd carried on."
Probably used Zoom for conferencing.
Very likely NextCloud for file sharing. Maybe OpenKolab. Maybe just mount a remote drive; networked drives go back an awully long way in Linux history, well before Microsoft got into the act.
It's amazing what you can do when local politics doesn't get in the way.
"If only some large body had thought of this! And tried it! Oh wait, Munich did, and gave up."
Yes, but even Microsoft can't afford relocate a big local office into every city that decides to quit using their software. I suppose, of course, when they've retrieved the situation in one city that office is now redundant and they can relocate it if they want to play whack-a-mole.
Of the recent RHEL clones AlmaLinux has a link on their front page to TuxCare who will provide commercial support. Rocky Linux has a link to CIQ but their site seems to have been designed by a marketing so concerned to make a good impression that they don't actually say what they do: support? hosting? In any case I'm quite sure TuxCare would be equally happy to support it - and Debian.
Canonical offer enterprise support for Ubuntu as does Suse for Suse.
Lack of enterprise support is just another of those scare stories that doesn't stand up to close examination.
"But Windows supports more programs that are significant to more people."
There's a circular argument here. People decide that MS Office is significant to them. If they were to deide, as GitLab presumably does, that something else such as LibreOffice is significant to them then the compulsion to use Windows goes away. But people see Office as significant to them because they've been told that that's what Windows provides.
Now as MS wants to move more users to subscription and inflation tightens budgets does a monthly spend for Office 365 seem a good idea any more? And what happens if the next Windows is also the subscription model that MS seem to want?
"The patent has to be invented by a natural person"
The invention might involve a large team working on prototypes, testing and discarding. Wasn't that Edison's method with the light bulb? Do all those get a share in the patent or just the boss man?
It devolves into who was the inventor not how they did it, whether by pure brain power or by wielding some tool, even if that tool is a research team or a computer program of some sort.
Apart from anything else it disregards the possibilities of cybersquatting such as was reported here recently. If someone pushes a deliberately malicious piece of software onto a repository as a new project then they'll happily tick all the boxes claiming to follow best practices. Don't expect someone being dishonest in intent to be honest in method.
The first check needed is "Are there gatekeepers?" It seems not.
"I have no doubt that one day, self driving cars will be better at driving than humans ever were."
It might vary depending on where you live but if you take the number of vehicles on UK roads, reasonable estimates for annual mileages and the statistics for fatal accidents the bar for self-driving cars is fairly high and higher still when you realise that it should match or beat the experienced driver and the accident statistics are skewed by inexperienced drivers.
"The important difference being that it wasn't really the autopilot that landed you, autopilots were on airplanes for literally decades before the automated landing systems were flight rated"
Which really proves the point. If people over-estimate what autopilot on planes do and confuse it with automated landing systems it's very likely that they'll over-estimate what it does in cars.
This is what's apt to go wrong with specifications. Specify exactly what the system is supposed to do and it might do that and nothing else.
Never mind the flock of sheep, can it cope with just one sheep that looks as if it's about to head into the road? And how does it recognise "looks as if it's about to head into the road"?
"At least drones have some kind of viable, believable and remotely feasible use cases. NFTs are a gigantic steaming pile of festering bullshit designed to part even more fools from their money."
Parting fools from their money is the feasible use case for NFTs.
"What about just sticking to what was agreed, cannot be that difficult."
I'm not sure which agreement you mean.
The Good Friday Agreement was for no hard border in the island of Ireland which worked because both N & S were in the EU.
The withdrawal agreement left NI effectively in the EU whilst Britain left.
The agreement by which the Irish Republic became independent of Britain whilst the six northern counties remained in UK (full name The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland).
Any two are mutually consistent, the three are not. This simple piece of logic may have not have given rise to a problem in Brexiteer's heads but in reality it's been a problem since day one. Brexit done? Only if you shut your eyes to reality.
Then it only leaves southern England to melt / sink into the waves / fall victim to a plague of zombie estate agents (delete as appropriate) and "Global Yorkshire" will be free.
This is an attractive idea but I'm not sure that the post-glacial rebound* is even still continuing and it would never have been enough for the sink beneath the waves option.
* The weight of the Ice Age ice on Scotland, N England & N Ireland caused them to sink somewhat and sea levels fell due to the amount of water tied up in the ice cap When the ice melted sea levels rose quite quickly. The deformation recovered much more slowly but did recover. It gave time for Late glacial beaches to be formed which were then hoisted tens of feet higher giving rise to the phenomenon of raised beaches, readily visible around the coasts of N Ireland and Scotland if you know what you're looking for. But the S of England wasn't covered by ice so as the north was pressed down the south bulged up a bit and then when the rebound took place it sank slightly.
It may have escaped your notice but the Irish Republic is part of the EU. They joined when we did but they didn't leave.
Why on Earth would the EU want to fence of part of itself? They didn't instigate this, the Brexiteers did and obviously considered that fencing off part of the UK as their logical solution was an acceptable price to pay.