Re: Don't be fooled...
Ken Thompson as a lot of them as well: https://thenewstack.io/jukebox-to-player-piano-ken-thompsons-lifelong-pop-music-project/
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"A lot of their value is freeloading off the backs of open source developers who worked on Pi software."
Oh, look. They're freeloading off the backs of Microsoft developers too: https://raspberrytips.com/windows-11-on-raspberry-pi/
And what about Intel? All those of us running Linux on our PCs! And AMD, too, of course.
Did it have a passenger? If so he's the person in charge, even if not in the driving seat as it was operating under his direction as he summoned it to collect him and instructed it to go to a particular destination. If would-be passenger s are likely to get tickets Waymo have a strong commercial incentive to make their cars drive better.
If it's unsatisfactory to consider the passenger the person in charge than the company should have a driver of record for the fleet, the exec responsible for the way the vehicles operate day-to-day. Whoever signs off the S/W as being fit for use on the public roads is responsible for what they do there.
From TFA: "difficulties with regulation, specific software only being approved for specific operating system versions"
This raises the question of whether the specific operating system vrsion is the same specific operating system version after an update has been applied and whether this conflicts with a likely requirement that the operating system be kept up to data.
"Linux everybody wants their own thing,"
You have a problem with that?
Once you get into the "standardisation" thing you discover that Microsoft can shove anything onto its supine user base and they have no alternative.
How many wanted W8? It doesn't matter, they got it whether they wanted it or not.
How many wanted the ongoing rot of the start menu? It doesn't matter, they got it whether they wanted it or not.
How many wanted the growing strangeness of Gnome? It doesn't matter, those who don't want it have alternatives.
What's lacking here, and needed for any large software undertaking, is someone, call them product manager, architect or maintainer, to take an overview. It might be necessary to meet some proposals with an outright "No". Otherwise it might be "That sounds like a good idea but integrate it with the rest to make it look as if it was designed in from the start".
To a large extend what a commercial organisation does with its data is between its management, shareholders and customers. As long as I'm not one of their shareholders or customers it's their problem how leaky their systems although they really should be doing due diligence.
When it comes to my government, however, I can't help but be concerned because it's my taxes paying for it and it's inevitable that at some point one of them might be handling my data. I'd hope, therefore, that they do their due diligence in which case they should be taking note of factors such as this: https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366632040/Microsoft-hides-key-data-flow-information-in-plain-sight which more or less confirms that Brad Smith admitted in France. They can't provide data sovereignty.
It will very likely not take many of the sort of suits against the police that the CW article talks about to start CEOs asking their IT departments if that's a risk for them. What are they going to say? "Well, everyone else is doing it" isn't going to be adequate.