Re: You're holding it wrong!
Those who don't adapt will miss their appointment in the calendar.
40558 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"excess heat"
What happens to the rest of the energy that wasn't released as excess heat? Some of it might be stored in the longer term as potential energy or chemical energy but for the most part it ends up as heat in some way - aerodynamic drag, friction, boiling kettles or whatever. You have to take all of it into account although as brainwrong points out, it's not very significant.
"Ounces, Miles and Pounds"
In an IT world we really shouldn't be promoting decimal based units. Binary would be far more logical and ounces and pounds fit into that. There's a historical reason for that, of course - when you're weighing with a simple balance the easiest way to divide up some quantity is into two equal halves.
I always thought that decimalising UK coinage was a mistake: just make the new penny 256 to the pound instead of 240, a new hexadecimal shilling of 16 pence and reintroduce the groat (4 pence) as being midway between the old threepenny bit and the tanner.
"before I escalated the ticket to the team that was allowed to actually go out and visit desks"
I think I might have reminded him (irrespective of whether it was actually true) that a call-out would be charged against his teams budget so he might really like to double check.
What it seems to be referring to is that the initial standard produced by that stuffed panel was supposed to be transitional and replaced by a strict version but MS ept using the transitional. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standardization_of_Office_Open_XML doesn't actually use the word deprecated in its account of the shenanigans.
However as far as the ODF is concerned the true open standard isn't ISO/IEC 29500 \t all, it's ISO/IEC 26300:2006.
"Strange manipulations of XML files? As a KDE user, I know about these woes."
Interesting. I just check the contents of my /usr/share/plasma directory. There are over 10 times as many QML files as XML. What really surprised me was that there were almost twice as many JSON files as XML.
Of course you know to have emails originating from your legit relay. What t about someone not in the industry who doesn't know better trying to operate something legit from one of these ISPs? Is it right that they should suffer because of the service's other users?
"their customers if legitimate ones need to choose a better ISP."
This is victim blaming. How do they find out why they're being blocked to know to choose a better MSP and how do they find out who's better.
I have no sympathy whatsoever for spammers but care needs to be taken avoid collateral damage.
LDS's comment hits the nail on the head. They're a reputation service. If they make decisions about reputations which impact on people they should be prepared to stand over them. There seem to be numerous complains that they're not doing that. It may be that their decisions are 100% justified but if so why not explain them?
"Plus if you clearly state the rules for inclusion, I suspect it'd be hard to argue defamation"
And yet people are saying it is hard to argue. Just read the story and comments here where people are claiming they're being listed and not able to find out why when they can't work out what they're doing which is against the rules. In such a circumstance the obvious option for someone in that position is to force them into court to put up or shut up. If, as the article suggests, major corporations are getting blocked, then this is likely to happen.
"Just" a reputation service?
Being a reputation service is the core of the problem if, as some of these stories claim, besmirching reputations without good cause.
It's no use saying no one is forced to use it - the use is at the discretion of the receivers. If someone is being wrongly accused by them of spamming they have no say at all in this.
"Entirely through the stupidity of the Trusts' senior management. The money never existed, but was put on the balance sheet as though it did!"
IANAA but I'd expect that there are accounting rules saying that the value of the shares had to go on the balance sheet just like the value of the buildings, the furniture, the contents of the pharmacy and everything else. If they hadn't done that the shit would really have hit the fan when the auditors discovered the fact.
"That is ignoring the value of the data that was handed over. "
The hospital trusts still have the data and hence the value if there's value to be extracted. What happens to the copy the company has (and at least some trusts seem not to have handed any over) or what constraints accompanied it we haven't been told.
"You wanted to leave, you got the votes and Brexit happened. Stop trying to get your snouts back in the trough you claimed you didn't want or need."
As ever, it's not quite so simple. The vote was tight. Those who are the losers in this are likely to have voted "No". In fact some of them would have been too young to vote at the time.
It is grossly offensive to tell people whose careers were ruined by no action of their own that they're wanting to get their snouts back in the trough.