"gas holders are not how gas pressure is retained nowadays alas"
Nevertheless we have run gas fires and hob in outages. It's a big network and rather more resilient than the electricity supply.
42029 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
The majority maybe only last for a few moments and present no threat (except for the one a couple of weeks ago that took out my ancient NAS ago the real killer was the 3 hour one a few days later when I'd got the firmware restored & was running a disk scan). It's the longer ones in winter when hypothermia sets in in the all electric households and nobody can call an ambulance.
There's a difference between pushing us into a brave new world of unreliable power supplies and requiring the electricity supply people to look up the word "resilience" in their dictionaries.
As things go we at least have a gas hob and a couple of gas fires so a power cut still leaves us with heat and limited cooking. Decarbonise utilities entirely and we would be pushed back way beyond the experience of >60 years ago when I grew up in a house without any electricity at all - but had gas and coal fires.
From what I can make out a number of more recent routers have VOIP outlets and there are adapters. The bigger worry is if DV only works with BT lines what are the rest going to do. Last time I spoke to PlusNet I got an airy I'm sure they'll do something. If, as someone up thread mentioned, something is going to be nothing I'll count that as a termination of contract as the contract is for broadband and phone. Zen seem to be offering both and their FritzBox sounds rather snazzy with their reputation even more so.
As I read it they're just installing a version of the Digital Voice whatnot back at what's left of the exchange and then running it over the copper as before. Or, cynically, given that the back-haul for the switch is already digital, they're just leaving everything as it is instead of disconnecting it with the rest.
"I have used DECT phones on the landline for probably 25 years."
I've also had DECT on the landline. I also have a POTS phone on it. It works when the power's out on account of a big bank of batteries about 2 miles away at the switch. I call up the electrickery people on it when the power goes off and the mobile signal's playing up.
I'm wondering how effective battery backup in the home will be if the power in the FTTC footway box isn't backed up. Are these powered from the DC supply at the switch in the same way as POTS?
We seem to have increasing numbers of power cuts recently and mobile signal can't be fully relied on. Longest outage in c 20 or 21 was 17 hours.
They're really mashing up text that they've been given their material is words which only connect with other words. By the time you were capable of saying "Mama" and "Dada" and standing on two feet you were already building an internal model of the real world by virtue of being a physical entity and encountering other physical entities that constitute that external world. Other animal species also do this. Where words enter things is that you then learned to use them as symbols for those external entities and use them to better manipulate and extend that internal model. You associate words with objects in [your model of] the real world. That's what gives them and the ways in which you use them meaning. Those LLM gimmicks only associate words with other words. They have no other model with which to connect them. By drawing on the associations between words they can appear to be indistinguishable from real thought when things fall that way spew garbage otherwise. They have no meanings for the words outside the statistical associations..
That's because the Bar Exam is a series of questions which have been answered many times in the past. Train up on that and there is existing material to answer Bar Exam questions available to be mashed together and regurgitated. Require the preparation of documents for a new case and there is no material which has been prepared for the case so it has to provide a pastiche of the sort of papers it has been asked to prepare without any real guidance of what should be said.
First define intelligence. Not artificial intelligence, real intelligence because unless we agree on that we can't tell whether you've achieved your goal in producing an artificial version. Not in some airy-fairy philosophical terms but in terms which has be independently confirmed and agreed upon. 2030? Good luck in achieving that first step by then. Otherwise you're simply putting whatever you've got in a box, calling it AI and claiming success.
I've just finished re-reading Feynman's appendix to the Challenger report. His last sentence is something that should be borne in mind by anyone making such claims:
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."
It's about the age of a lot of Debian by the time it's released!
Currently the two previous versions are still maintained as Old Stable and the two previous to that have LTS which I believe is commercial rather than community. The oldest was released in 2015. Current Stable was released in June this year running kernel 6.1.
"Sounds about right, though I would think that you probably don't need *all* the spaces to be electrified because many people will have home chargers and will arrive at the car park with a full-ish battery."
You'd need to avoid the situation of arriving in the car park to find all the electrified places occupied but not all the chargers not being used because the car gets charged at home. It might still not be 100% but for locations such as motorway service stations it would need to approach it. I almost invariably manage to avoid buying petrol at a motorway service station because of the price but for charging an EV on a long journey it might be inevitable. And how does the infrastructure for a concentration of rapid chargers get put into place?
Of course that ignore the question of why all these cars are driving around. A lot of modelling and, even worse, policy seems to assume it just happens for no reason other than that it can. A very great deal of it is conveying people to and from employment and a great deal of that is the consequence of half-arsed planning legislation (at least in the UK) for the last 70 years or so. One of the principles of that was to separate where people live from where they work for reasons which may have seemed good in the days of heavy industry but which are irrelevant today. Couple that with the inadequacy of public transport and the economy depends on people driving cars into congested centres.
Nothing can be acieved until that gets unravelled and the unravelling has to start with government. Government should be incentivising a mixture of WFH which would include working AT home but also the possibility of fragmenting work spaces into smaller units which can be located close to where people live. Not just incentivising but setting an example. Instead we have numpties demanding to see bums on seats in HMG offices in central London. That's how bad it is.
"The real story should be why such a course of action is so unpalatable to the UK."
It's unpalatable to half of the UK because we told the other half and they didn't want to listen or didn't believe it so we're lumbered with it. It's unpalatable to the other half because they were told and didn't want to listen, didn't believe it and probably in many cases still don't so they've lumbered themselves and us with it.
That could be supply and demand but hydrogen is certainly tricky stuff to handle. But I've no doubt supply and demand is operating between EV sales and public charging infrastructure is holding back EVs. It's not just range concerns, it's the huge percentage of properties with no private car parking where home chargers an be located and to a lesser extent charging times. I can always find a choice of petrol pumps with minimal queuing and only occupy one of them for a few minutes at a time. I can point to rows of houses near home with no chance of installing private charging facilities with numbers of vehicles parked outside far in excess of the capacity of the few local chargers. If government is serious about getting a move to EVs they need to take action to ensure that is remedied. The only effect of banning sales of ICE vehicles will be to grossly extend the working lives of the existing fleet and/or create an underclass who have no means of transport, bus services being a fraction of what they were 60 years ago. It's no use passing legislation that is little more than a pius hope greenwashing.
"The USPTO doesn't want any responses faxed - just emailed, which begs the question why that wouldn't work as a fax alternative."
Let me guess. With patents precedence matters. If the situation arises that two inventors submit similar claims at more or less the same time they need to decide who has precedence. With fax they know - transmission and reception are simultaneous. Enail is store and forwards so time of receipt is no indication of time of transmission and if that same situation arises they won't know and the loser will always claim theirs was first but delayed and/or dirty tricks were played with clock setting.
OTOH a prolonged outage of all forms of communication to USPTO wouldn't lose anything of value to humanity as a whole.
"because, obviously, who would configure a 90-second ringtone ?"
They made an assumption. Any assumption quickly becomes a limitation if not a bug. Assume as little as possible, Even so it should be a requirement of ringing a phone that the ring tone ill be cut off as soon as it's answered.
"Cloning the MAC Address of the original ISP router can be useful to avoid 'simple' detection if you replace the router"
Didn't bother, just stuck a TP-Link in as was. Only issue with that, several generations of router have been quite happy to live with the name I chose to give the router in my hosts file. This one doesn't like it so I just use the IP address to connect to it.
There's also a "dogfooding" aspect to the move. Fujitsu currently emphasizes its "Uvance" digital experience practice and methodologies.
Unlike some companies we could think of.
Of course it's possible they might need to sell off property to pay compensation to ex-sub-postmasters - if so, not before time. Justice delayed is justice denied.