Re: I call BS
"a scintillation counter"
Point of information - gas proportional counter also does this. It was the first system in use in the QUB carbon dating lab. But in terms of volume and need for high voltages, not in this application.
33016 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"There are approximately 640 times more lines of code devoted to tests than there are in the database engine itself."
Who tests the testers?
With that degree of excess I'd hope that some of those LOC are there to test the tests of the engine and that some are there to test the tests of the tests...
Tricky things, rights. Really they're nothing more than pre-negotiated agreements as to how we all behave to each other.
One corollary of that is that they have to apply all round. So if X has the right to post that 5G caused Coronavirus-19 then Y has the right to post evidence that X's post was bollocks. X can't then argue that Y shouldn't have that right without arguing that they don't have it themselves.
Another corollary is that as soon as there are multiple rights is that there's a possibility of conflict and precedence is needed to sort them out. We usually put the right to life first so freedom of speech has to take a lower precedence.
One of the consequences of Thalidomide, of course, is that clinical trials have become more rigorous. If things didn't move on in medicine and epidemiology we'd still be catching and dying from the plague from rat fleas, cholera from dirty water, smallpox from each other and dying from numerous bacterial infections.
"I've had Corona"
Was that diagnosed with a specific test* or was it just some unspecified upper respiratory tract infection?
Assuming you genuinely did have it how many (obviously unvaccinated) people did you pass it onto? How many more got it passed on indirectly? How many of those did you indirectly kill?
"I've had Corona" isn't a straightforward statement to make for anyone. Unless they isolated themselves before becoming infected they must realise that there's an ongoing chain of infections extending before them and that people could be dying from what they unwittingly passed on. I'd have expected that the one thing anyone in that position, who thinks the thing through and has any trace of conscience would support anything that breaks that chain.
* And if you don't trust science how would you know that the test was right? Or even that the virus exists?
"they took one look at this ruffian clutching a supermarket carrier bag"
One of the best - and truest - lines in LOTSW was along those lines. The scruffs were wandering through a car showroom. One salesman to another: "Shall I throw them out?" "Nay lad, round here they can look like that and be millionaires."
OTOH about 20 years ago I had gig where my client wanted me to do some work on site at their customer's HO and insisted that I wear a suit on site. So I ended up working in a rapidly dishevelling suit in a heat wave (spending as much time as possible in the machine room to take advantage of the aircon). The customer manager I dealt with was in shorts and sandals in the office. He was the one with appropriate attire.
On seeing the headline I wondered that. From what I understand of the report it wasn't a court decision in the first place, just an agreement with a Govt department who was trusting enough to to put in that provision originally.
Perhaps the better option now would have been to just break it up without the option on the basis that now the conditions have been breached the benefits can't possibly exist. Apart from anything else it would terrify the others.
"both the local and BBC sites covered some of them them. Today neither of them does"
So the local paper doesn't have the Beeb as competition any more. If it wanted to invest in building up its local reporting it could do so.
I suspect the malaise of local press is more that it isn't local any more. Many of the local papers got bought up by national chains that had no local focus.
"local press particularly hard hit and virtually out of business in some parts of the UK. I don't believe that Google is the primary cause of this"
Quite.
Taking "press" literally the problem is delivery networks. Our local newspaper shop can't get kids to deliver to us any more and I'm not trailing all that way every day just to get a paper.
Online they totally disregarded GDPR with needing to provide 100+ opt-outs every time you went online, one of the many reasons why I have one browser set up in amnesiac mode.
Since then things have got worse as, with so many in the group their domain is $OLD_TITLElive.co.uk and, amid the mess that's now its UI, persists in wanting to throw at me local stories from all over the place except here.
"it is potentially a global precedent for how publishers and web giants interact "
I thought Spain and Germany had already tried this out with the results any disinterested observer would have expected. But then there's always the possibility that doing the same thing will have a different result next time.
"I had Covid-19 in January."
Diagnosed?
And if so how many others did you infect? A genuine infection back then must represent a considerable number of subsequent infections and maybe there'll have been a few deaths as well.
"It was rather harmless"
Assuming you did have it have you been checked for any damage which might give rise to long term complications?
And see above. If you spread it to others it may have been far from harmless to them.
"Therefore, I'm immune."
As per Spanners comment, are you sure?
In any case, these precautionary measures aren't to protect you, they're to protect the community at large from the possibility that you are are infective. An infection is a phenomenon involving one person, an epidemic or pandemic involves the population at large and the defensive response needs to be that of the entire population not of the entire population excepting those who feel they're somehow above it.