Re: Ah, the land of the best Justice money can buy
It has to be asked whether the US constitution - of which they are ridiculously proud - is fit for purpose in the C21st.
42029 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"I have spent some time trying to get OneNote to run under WINE."
The W10 installation on one of my laptops couldn't run it either. When it booted up it complained about a wrong dll or the like. After a lot of patch Tuesday cycles I noticed it stopped complaining. Whether it works I know not. I'm tempted to look at the possibility of creating a Tb's worth of random words - or select a few random words, arrange them in loose associations and embed copies of them in more random words. Just to add a little data to MS's data mining.
That reminds me, I must check to see if it's monthly patching run has finished yet. It's been going several hours. The Devuan run took about quarter of an hour.
"Why not install Open Shell for her? It makes nearly all of the pain of W10 go away."
I think you underestimate the situation.
Her desktop is littered with icons for all sorts of things including email, most of which seem to be invocations of ie to open specific sites. There's no way I'd start to replicate all that and I suspect there's no way she'd want to do so either. It still would look different even if that were done*. From my point of view it's a matter of quietly tip-toeing backwards out of the room.
BTW she has a degree in physics - from the early 1970s as far as I can recall.
* I could, of course, fake up a Linux desktop to present a reasonable facsimile of either 7 or 10.
"Perhaps recommending Chrome OS Flex as a replacement for macOS is a step too far even for Microsoft just yet."
It's possible they're trying to edge their business to a Microsoft equivalent of this - it's just that they expect you to run their web services rather than Google's and don't really mind if you do that from Linux.
There is still only one planet demonstrated to have life on it. The fact that this is extended to anything between "must be others" and "must be ubiquitous where ever conditions are right" is extreme observe bias.
Looked at objectively the number of systems which have to come into existence, come together and become integrated into a working whole makes the existence of life extremely unlikely. Once it exists it's extremely good at propagating the unlikely which is maybe why it seems inevitable.
"so in the real world what is the right solution if it isn't Excel?"
It would appear that there's a gap in the market for a tool which manages data rather better than Excel but which can be configured by non-specialists even if it's not in the Office suite. Of course as it's not in the Office suite the need for it is not even visible to many business users.
with whole company structures being beholden to beancounters
The problem with having things run by beancounters is that there's never budget to do it right in the first place but there's always budget to recover the disaster.
Excel is cheap, fast and "mostly-good-enough *right now*"
I think it's a often a case of looking mostly-good-enough rather than being that.
Rotweillers notwithstanding, going straight to A&E is the appropriate measure. The ECG & biochemistry diagnostics are not likely to be within your GP's capabilities. SWMBO was in a similar situation last year. I took here straight to A&E who transferred her the same night to the cardiac ward at the other hospital in the trust. They got her in for a heart valve replacement ASAP.
I think there's one simple principle that would sort this out for good. If I hand over personal information to a second party for some reason that party becomes directly responsible to me, and answerable in a court in the jurisdiction where I live, for safeguarding that information. If they hand it over to a 3rd party they're still responsible, even if that 3rd party hands it over to a 4th party etc. up to infinity, it doesn't matter whichever party is responsible for any abuse, it's the second party on the hook.
The sole exception would be access required by law of the jurisdiction where I live. CLOUD Act? If I don't live in the US the 2nd party is on the hook.
International agreements? The 2nd party is on the hook.
If the 2nd party wants to use a 3rd party they need to come to a judgement about that party's reliability and exposure because they're going to be liable for the 3rd party's failures.
Microsoft's view will be that given that it's not in the browser it can't be tolerated elsewhere because from Microsoft's PoV everything has to be run in the browser using Microsoft's cloud. Of course that applies to any other programming language too. The logical consequence is that all the other programming languages available to Windows will have to follow it. Elementary when you think about it.
"The defense's explanation for this, according to White, is that Alameda was responsible for converting US dollars to stablecoins (digital tokens pegged to the dollar) and used the flag to borrow funds from FTX before returning them as stablecoins."
Sounds plausible. After all it's wrapped up in this code to ensure the transaction completes, isn't it?
Isn't it?
Is it?
Where is it?
Why wait a day? Or to put it another way, why announce a day early?
If it's urgent tomorrow it's urgent today so waiting a day (or however many days it's been) isn't justified. OTOH if it's really not ready don't announce it in advance and tip the bad guys off that it might be worth looking for something for which a patch isn't available. It doesn't make sense.
I always use a script to dd a download onto an SD card, usually duplicating the last line* of the script, commenting it out and then editing the if=value to be the new file name. Nevertheless between pressing enter on ./script and the red LED starting to flash on the SD adapter there's an enormously elongated couple of seconds of thinking "Could I have gone wrong and be doing this to /dev/sda?"
* The script ends up being a series of commented out lines and one non-commented line. From time to time it gets pruned.