"or are out of data on their phone"
AFAIK the mode of operation being claimed is that it simply stores the scanned codes on the phone so being out of data wouldn't make a difference. Where things go from there is a bit less clear.
33045 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"I'm beginning to think that the practical test during the interview for a senior government position"
I think you're over-estimating the rigour of the appointment process. Not in supposing the existence of a practical test but in supposing the existence of an interview.
The appointment procedure was probably no more than:
"She's married to one of us."
"We gave her a seat in the HoL"*
"She ran an internet business so she must know about these things."
The fact that the internet business was persistently at or near the bottom of the heap on measures other than cheapness and not safeguarding its customers' PII obviously wasn't taken into consideration.
It's showing up in aspects such as the allocation of testing appointments seems to be based on a very old, cheapest and misleading satnav.
* NB I don't think being in the HoL per se should be a contra-indication. On the contrary, I think the HoL should be strengthened by an ex officio process for appointing people from the top of appropriate professions - science, engineering & medicine - to it so that Parliament gains rather more people who know what they're talking about and would be available for positions of public responsibility.
And exactly what does the app do with the QR code once it's read it?
Most reports are a bit light in detail/ According to the only privacy statement (for the trial, not the launch) I could find it's supposed to store the locations on the phone so I have a list to tell me where I've been. Somehow I think I might have worked out where I've been for myself. What use am I going to make of that? Does the app phone home to find a list of premises to which an outbreak has been traced? If so, at what point is the privacy statement quietly changed so the app can upload the list so the list can be checked centrally - so much more efficient?
Wouldn't it be nice to have someone in charge who had an impeccable a track-record of trustworthiness in sageguarding PII?
I assume from the .com in their domain name Pro Privacy aren't actually a charity so I'm sure those strictures couldn't possibly be aimed at them. But I do wonder why they want to add Javascript from, for instance, tableau.com.
It's a valid warrant in the US. That makes it impossible for US-based FB to be able to perform the SCCs. That makes the SCCs worthless in the EU. If they want to comply with GDPR they need to ensure any PII is held securely outside the grasp or the USl. If they don't want to do that then it's time to start fining them. Actions speak louder than words; no amount of waffle about how much they want to makes any difference at al
"I really want rid of the thing, but it's almost the only way a large number of people I know chose to communicate for some reason."
Just do it. Tell your "friends" our phone number and/or email address as you prefer. That way you find out who your friends rally are and those who aren't can be dumped along with FB.
"The media demand a loud, aggressive, unthinking jingoism for political parties. They're too stupid and greedy to consider anything more nuanced."
Ultimately what the media demand is a bad guide, I agree with you there.
But someone being put forward as a potential head of government for several years needs to demonstrate the ability to actually make rational decisions.
Rational decisions. Two words. We were offered a choice of zero or one.
The frothing loons are probably those of us who've seen it all before. Many times
HMG of the day pours lots of funds into whatever. Next HMG cans it because
(a) NIH and/or
(b) realised we've poured lots of funds in and all we've got is this one lousy proto-type and we can't afford to build more at that price each, failing to grasp that now you've done the development the build costs each will be much lower and/or
(c) serial reorganisations of government depts broke up the funding structure and/or
(d) political campaign against it because it's complicated and a lot of media/arts types don't understand it and/or
(e) meddling form on high smothered it and/or
(f) sacrificed so govt. could suck up to US by buying whatever it was from them - or because US didn't have one to sell and were upset by that and/or
(g) any other form of incompetence and ignorance you cn think of.
Some of the victims were started by people who looked a good deal more competent than the current crew.
Those who don't remember their history are condemned to repeat it.
"with no track record in the tech industry. "
They have a track record. It's a track record acquired in a very short time. It's a track record of promising "world beating", "UK will be the best place in the world for" etc. for things which promptly fall flat on their face. It's not a track record that inspires confidence.
Life is an extremely improbable* arrangement for preserving the improbable. It's not really surprising that they've found nothing.
* We have several quite different chemical systems linked together. Some of these are made out of polymers of amino acids**: systems capable of handling energy by manipulating electrons and protons, chains of specific catalysts to synthesise other molecules including assembling amino acid polymers, structural elements including membranes made from combinations of lipids. The "other molecules" include those which are necessary for the energy handling such as chlorophyll, heam and adenosine and its phosphates and, of course, the amino acids themselves. Then there's the nucleic acid system, DNA or, in some cases, RNA genes, mRNA transcripts of the genes, tRNA to specifically bring the correct amino acid to add to the amino acid polymer and rRNA in the ribosomes. Individual monomers and other molecules may be readily enough found but assembling them together at random into a combination that is capable of bootstrapping itself into what we know today is extremely improbably, even taking into account that some mineral surfaces could have stood in for what proteins do now.
** Not just random chains but chains of specific sequences which lead to folding into specific shapes to provide the other functions.
"It would set a terrible precedent where administrations would want to jail their predecessor for lesser and lesser crimes"
The answer to that is that administrations shouldn't have that power It would require an independent body that starts work* the moment a head of government ends their period of office, looking at any illegalities that might have taken place during the period of office and possibly during the elections that preceded it and prosecuting accordingly. Such a body would have to be right outside politics and, give or take the normal retirements and recruitments - which clearly would have to be outside the influence of the administration - would be the same one to eventually deal with the new administration as dealt with the previous one. It wouldn't be an exceptional process to conduct such an investigation, just business as usual.
In reality the role of such a body would be to deter administrations from wrong-doing rather than to punish afterwards although it would obviously be obliged to take action from time to time; at least that would strengthen the deterrent for the next few administrations.
* In terms of being able to demand and evaluate evidence. There's nothing to stop them taking notes of what's out there in public before then.
"But they've changed the application icon no less than FOUR TIMES since they started Vivaldi, each time listing it in the changelog like it's some marvellous advancement."
A sure sign marketing is in charge.
If you want a combined browser/mail (and more) client, try SeaMonkey. Add in Lightning and Lightbird if you want to include a calendar function.