Re: This isn't the Brexit we voted for.
"Thats a barefaced lie.."
There were a lot of those about at the time,
40413 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"As we recently described, Red Hat goes to extreme lengths to keep old kernels supported and secure."
My takeaway from that talk was that it was about the hoops external contributors had to go through and the testing RH would perform to get external submissions into the long-term supported kernels. The contributors may have been upstream recent kernel contributions to be back-ported or third parties (?H/W vendors) wanting to get things in. Unless I missed something - possible as I found the delivery extremely soporific - there was nothing there about RH providing their own additions.
"can we expect a license change to the Linux kernel along with the multitude of other upstream components Red Hat uses forcing them to make their source code freely available if they want to make use of any future release?"
The Linux kernel has, over the years, had a large number of contributors. All have contributed under GPL2. In order to change it all those contributors would have to be contacted and their consent obtained. Some will not have been on contact with the kernel devs for some time, maybe years, and would have to be traced before they could be contacted. Some will have died and the tracing extended to find their heirs. And some will work for Red Hat. Failing such consent the non-consenting and untraced contributors contributions would have to be replaced. This has been pointed out in every thread relating to this.
Taking all that into account, you tell me - can we expect a licence change?
The copyright owners have rights here. If they think RH are breaking copyright terms then they can take RH to court. Now here's a thing to ponder. There are an awful lot of them. There may even be more of them than RH/IBM have lawyers. What happens if they individually challenge RH? How many fronts can RH fight on?
" If you are using hardware whose vendor only offers drivers for RHEL, or the applications that you need are only supported on RHEL – " then you might be having a bit of a discussion with that vendor right now.
For H/W manufacturers drivers are a necessary means to sell their product, they aren't a product in themselves. If the availability of a say, Debian, driver becomes essential for selling product then a Debian driver will be along in due course. After all, they're both Linux drivers; it's not like they'd be starting from scratch. The reason why there's only RH at the moment is going to be because marketing tell them that's all they needed. Markets can, and do, shift.
"While no one can put a price on slamming the phone down on a call center worker"
If you can live without using the phone for 10 minutes or so don't do that; they'll just hit somebody else.
Ask the salesdroid to hand on a moment - there's somebody at the door, the children need something or whatever. Then lay the phone aside for a while, then hang up. Consider it a public service. Bonus points if you can get them to call back for a second dose. Double bonus if their supervisor calls to tell you there's something wrong with your phone line - yes, it really happened.
"Meanwhile, Solar-Lezema told us he only helped write the introduction of the paper, and didn't know Drori was using the dataset to claim that GPT-4 was good enough to graduate with a computer science degree from MIT."
Why put your name to the introduction when you don't know what the paper's going to say? Either write the intro after the paper's written or require a right to remove the intro before submission.
Anywhere where volunteers run things like the local community centre.
Not everyone gets along with doing things electronically and if they don't it's best not to try. I won't say it's an age thing because quite possibly she will be younger than I am. Apart from which it's not so long ago that I as a freelancer, found it perfectly convenient to produce similar paper invoices and pay taxes with the company cheque book..oh, dammit - it was a long time ago.
Until a few months ago SWMBO paid a local community centre for her weekly patchwork class's room rent with cheques. The community centre used a stationer's duplicate book to produce hand-written invoices. All very old-fashioned.
The centre's book-keeper retired at the end of last year. The lady who took over from him decided to go all modern and has some S/W that produces PDFs she emails out and payment by bank transfer. The first mailing included the full run of PDFs for every group that uses the centre. The next had the correct total but incorrect number of weeks which makes me think her invoicing S/W is a word processor and a clip-art template gussied up with the centre's name. The other day there was an email saying the last payment hadn't been made although our bank statement shows it leaving our account to the account used for the previous few months and presumably the correct one.
Paper invoices and cheques were much more reliable.
The UK solution is that if you only have POTS it will be replaced by a low bandwidth internet connection that will support a VoIP service but nothing else. It still depends on FTTC being installed for everyone but less work than laying FTTP for everyone. We'll still have to wait & see what actually happens.
It's still beyond BT subsidiary PlusNet to tell anyone what they're going to do to implement this change. The excuse I was given was that it would confuse customers to tell them now. I'd have thought it would be a lot more confusing to wait until it happens to let them know. Maybe a decision made by someone with their retirement date pencilled in?
"a consistent experience across mobile phone UIs and a PC desktop"
All too often mobile phones have their UI elements positioned apparently at random. I've seen one where some control you'd expect to use only occasionally - IIRC the button to access configuration - was located bottom bar when other option, if they existed at all, were hard to find. If such little thought is given to the UI how much was given to other aspects - such as security?