Re: They have a Plan B.
It never had allies, only interests.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The problem there is not the drivers', it's the company itself using the Post-Office database for deliveries, which (if memory serves) does indeed not go down any closer geo-spatially than post-code centroid lat/longs."
Absolutely this. It's the company that refuses to accept correct coordinates.
In our case it's complicated by the fact that few houses in the lane have numbers and that the sequence of numbers is not entirely rational - 1 to 4 are a row on one side, half way alone, 1A & 1B are on the other side, back at the start. The rest have names, usually conspicuously displayed. One neighbour, by some reckoning system decided his must be no 19 so renamed his house "Nineteen".
If offered the choice I specify Royal Mail. The posties not only know where we live, they also know where our daughter lives and have delivered something of ours there for some good reason I can't now recall. They probably know about SWMBO's sister as well.
They must be scanning the codes already in order to email confirmation of delivery.
It would be very possible for a simple count of "2 out of 4 boxes found so far" to be displayed already. If it is the driver ignores it.
Currently they have no appropriate error handling to cover an expected code being missed. The consequence is that very strange things happen when the expected doesn't. I very much doubt that another scan will make any difference whatsoever except throwing a few AI hallucinations into the mix alongside the existing ones.
They could provide the driver with the destinations one at a time and only provide the next after the delivery has been completed. That would prevent the driver ignoring a warning. Of course there will be occasions when, for one reason or another, the delivery can't be completed and that would only provide them with more opportunities for bizarre failure modes.
IME it's not Amazon drivers who have the worst problems finding the front door. It's another company whose name is a TLA that insists the GPS coordinates are at the centre of the postcode about 100 metres away round he corner, refused to update them when supplied and consequently has delivered to a house there.. It also seems to dictate - and possibly monitor - that divers park there, in the narrowest part of the lane so the alternative has been a driver leaving his van there to walk the rest of the way.
Amazon's problem is dropping off only part of the delivery or possibly none at all and then getting thoroughly confused as to how to deal with it. I don't suppose AI would help with the first part of that but would certainly heap on more confusion.
Cumulatively those petty thefts can end up being a drain on a neighbourhood and cost the householders money on their insurance. Doing nothing lets them run on. A better tactic would be to take a quick look and see if there's an occasional one that leaves something for a follow-up. In your instance, does the front garden have a gate with a nice shiny metal handle on it that might take a print? Did the thief cross a patch of soil soft enough to leave a footprint? Obviously it helps a lot if the police have a suspect but even if they do have one nothing will happen without some crime scene evidence.
As a software architect with multiple decades of experience, I think that AI can (on a good day, barring insoluble hallucinations) "imitate" me implementing some kind of basic CRUD-capture form
That functionality was built into Informix Perform back in the '80s. A few people, including myself, wrote programs that created basic 4GL code to re-use the screen forms. Not difficult, all the information needed was in the system tables which implemented the SQL schema. No AI needed.