Re: 18 years
"Anyone knows why they are exempt from IR35?"
They have more than 5 shareholders.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Terraced houses able to charge cars? No such luck round here - they either open direct onto the pavement or just have the narrowest strip of land between them and the pavement. Trip hazards of charging a car parked on the road would be a no-no. And there are a lot of properties like that. It just points up the lack of public charging infrastructure.
"it hasn't needed a report to show this"
The bad news is that it has. Successive HMGs seem to think that all they need to do is pass legislation setting targets of whatever and whenever and it'll all happen whilst lacking any notion of what actually has to be done.
The Just Stop Oil & similar should also read it. You can't just do this, that or the other. You have to plan, put real money in and work hard at implementing the plan over a number of years.
"HIDE FOR TWO WEEKS THEN REPEAT LAST INSTRUCTION – INDEFINITELY."
I wonder how this language is parsed. It could hide for two weeks and them go into an infinite loop of dog-turn smearing or go into an infinite loop of one turd every two weeks. In the first instance extra error handling is needed unless there are a lot of dogs about.
That means you're writing two things, the text and the formatting instructions, in the same document but in two different languages. If you want to just concentrate on the text then just write that and then use whatever formatting application you want but I'd have thought WYSIWYG is going to eliminate a few print/review/fix-up cycles.
Let's not forget the guerrilla marketing of upgrades. Each new version could read what an older version had written but not vice versa so that needing to read a document you might receive from someone on a later version forced you to buy an upgrade and in turn force upgrades onto anyone on an older version to whom you might then send a document.
That game stopped when a requirement for standardisation was forced on Microsoft.
What do do next?
Subscriptions, of course.
"The 70-hour work week plan has another problem: it's illegal.
India’s Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code [PDF] limits working days to eight hours.
Aren’t billionaires and their opinions just great? "
That's easily solved. You define a few 21 hour days. Day one starts at 00:00ends at 21:00 and a new one then starts. That ends at what everyone else is claiming is 18:00 but is, on your redefinition, 21:00. That way you can have a 9 day week and can squeeze in 70 hours without even using up the full 8 hours per day. Anything is possible when you're a billionaire.
"it's the lack of an Outlook replacement that previously stopped me. But now we don't really use email at all."
There are plenty of email clients for Linux. Some of them pre-date Outlook. You may remember that Microsoft were late-comers to the internet. When Bill Gates finally realised that it wasn't going to go away there was panic all round to adapt.
"I just cannot understand why anyone would take that job."
Money. If you don't pay the rent and the redundancy there's still enough money in the kitty to pay a CEO enough to make it worthwhile. When there isn't she'll move on - or retire on the profits (hers, not the company's).
"But I still can't figure out how or why it would think I'd be interested in travelling to London, then Manchester."
It doesn't care whether you're interested in that at all. It only cares about selling advertising to Virgin. Virgin should be interested but YouTube is selling to Virgin's advertising department. If the advertising department get their views that's all they're interested in, that's what they get paid for. The fact the ads might piss off potential Virgin customers is beyond their comprehension.
"I'd have thought advertisers would have caught on to the fact that anybody actively blocking adverts really does NOT want to see them."
Advertisers are basically marketroids, narcissists who believe the entire world is waiting for their next frt, brain or otherwise. They cannot comprehend that anyone will not wish to see their ads or may react negatively to their product when the ads are thrust into their unwilling faces.
The advertising industry, in the meantime, has no interest in whether ads promote dispromote or have no effect at all on their customers sales. The only thing they sell is ads to advertisers.
You'll find the usage embedded in those online bastions of US language, the University of Cambridge dictionary, the Collins English dictionary, and no doubt, if I could bother walking across the room for my 1950ish Pocket Oxford, in there too.
And then in the Oxford edition of Fowler, the introduction quotes a 1911 letter from Fowler to his publishers:
"Not but what we may be of some use to the foreigner who knows English pretty well"
"You've missed out the bit about where Spain did no cost-benefit analysis (FWIW) on the programme before starting, and after the programme finished were unable to supply EU authorities with any information about how much the programme had cost."
Give or take the EU bit that sounds much like any UK govt I can recall.