Re: Plagiarism?
You've got to realise how difficult it makes his life when he's the only one marching in step.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
The people fashioning these laws were also responsible for GDPR so I think they have more than an inking.
OTOH they do seem to be under the impression that if personal data is transferred to a jurisdiction and leaked there it's a satisfactorily addressed if the victim can sue in that jurisdiction. It seems to be the same sort of thinking - that if some aspect of a transaction is handed over to a third party then the original vendor can duck any responsibility.
"Current liability rules, in particular national rules based on fault, are not adapted to handle compensation claims for harm caused by AI-enabled products/services,"
I don't see what adaptation should be needed. It's just a tool being used to deliver a result. If a corporation causes harm by a product or service it shouldn't make any difference as to whether it was caused by human action or by faulty hardware, software or AI. The corporation chooses whatever means it prefers to deliver the product or service and must take responsibility for the result.
"auto dealership was talked into agreeing to sell a 2024 Chevy Tahoe for $1 with a bit of prompt engineering. But the dealership isn't likely to follow through on that commitment."
Given that the bot said it was a legally binding offer it might be a bit more difficult than the dealership hopes to wriggle out of it. That wouldn't be more difficult than it deserves, of course.
"Growing up in London I was told that my tapwater had gone through eight sets of kidneys before reaching my tap."
When I told my co-workers in Belfast I was leaving and moving to London someone said "You're not going to drink the water, are you?". "Why not? Everyone else has." I didn't tell him about the radon in the South Belfast supply from the Mournes.
The March case referred to in the article refers to the criminal case for fraud and the $10million was "to avoid prosecution" in relation to that one report. I'd like to think that the actual victims would be first in line for compensation before the state gets its hands on whatever amount of money might actually be available (the corporation declared bankruptcy) but I somehow doubt it.
No, they only started counting from the first digital, GSM. Obviously the marketing folk involved only had digital memories
TACS, like its predecessors in the UK was analogue but it was the first truly cellular system in that a handset could transfer from one base station to another in mid-call which the early versions couldn't. That allowed for more and smaller service areas, the cells.
I thought Smart [sic] meters used 2G. And what, I wonder, do pacemaker monitors use?
I've always found the "generation" thing a bit odd. Back when TACS was introduced BT's existing car-phones were called System 4 so I assume they were the 4th generation, TACS became the 4th and the first GSM phones 6th.
"education, health, income, occupation, and other life-event data"
It's that "other" stuff that stretches credulity.
I can think of a number of life-events that have influenced the course of my own life for decades ahead, all unpredictable events occasioned by other people and even the weather. I'm sure that this is a universal rather than a unique situation. Whatever data they have on any individual they will be as unable to predict future external events in their subjects' lives and the consequences of those.
You were lucky. My experience was that there'd be a call-waiting bleep that took out the link. And it was always a double glazing company. I think there was a collective sigh from the whole of the Huddersfield area when we heard those bastards had - deservedly - gone down the tubes.
I have the an admittedly now oldish Asus, dual booted. There is no doubt at all that the W10 partition takes a lot longer to boot than the Devuan partition even when it doesn't decide it needs to configure Windows first. Even when it gets through the initial part of the boot to the completely gratuitous hi-res background image it's strangely reluctant to put up the password box. If all's going well it will display the desktop quickly - but then takes ages to populate the task bar with very little pinned on it or to actually respond to any attempt to launch an application so again Devuan wins the password to running application race.
I'm actually reading and writing this on SM. It's getting to be a problem, though, of trying one browser after another to see which has an acceptable combination of UI and working with a given site. (Dammit - it should be possible to use an expression like "site X" to suggest any given site and now even that option's been pinched by you-know-who.) Even NextCloud has gone down this route. I haven't looked by I suspect it's baked into PHP.
Those who have paid for software could reasonably take the view that (a) they paid for something that they expected to work so if updates are needed to accomplish that then they have already been paid for and (b) if it provides the functionality they require already they don't want the bloat.
However Microsoft has past form in changing file formats to be non-backwards compatible. It could also be argued that the updates to the installed base needed to read those should be covered by (a) above although, of course, we know that the intent was to force customers to re-buy what they'd already bought.
Unfortunately much innovation is going into busy work. We get new look buttons, web-sites which will only work on a narrow range of browsers. I can think of quite a bit of innovation that could usefully be done although some would involve unpicking a few years' worth of innovated crud.
"Later, Mosaic Corp evolved into Netscape, and that begat today's Mozilla."
And Netscape Communicator is still alive and hiding under the name "Seamonkey".
meanwhile NT has evolved into a monster that looks as if it wants to spend 30 years displaying the message "Preparing to Configure Windows. Don't turn off your computer".
I wonder if Microsoft have an entire department devoted to designing Wating graphics. It has a lot of them but then it needs a lot of them.
I want the proponents of these ideas to answer two questions:
1. Where's your peer-reviewed prrof of concept that shows it can be done effectively and safely?
2. Can you produce a convincing argument that this is consistent with the presumption of innocence, a legal principle that has kept us safe for centuries?
It's important to remember that any OS, irrespective of its user interfaces, is designed to present a series of false impressions to the user. The ongoing stream of CPU operations is presented as a collection of distinct processes. The blocks of data scattered and intermixed effectively at random over the storage device are presented as a set of places containing coherent files. A single storage device may be presented as several distinct devices and, at least in Unix and derivatives, multiple devices will be presented as one. Presenting all this through multiple UIs as required is just another addition to the box of triicks.