offering support to the airline "within hours" of the incident unfolding
And what's the cost of the disruption caused "within hours"?
42030 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Since the late 1960s in Belfast I've often thought that riot control technology should take a hint from ornithologists. One of the techniques for bird ringing is the use of rocket propelled nets - the rockets take the leading edge of the net forward too fast for escapes. The net is then dropped over an area and whatever's immobilised under it can be dealt with at leisure.
"Amstrad ... made the best CP/M machine of them all"
That would depend on what you wanted to do with it but I don't think you could add the sort of interface boards that some of us needed. I suppose the difference is between a machine built around CP/M as opposed to a computing machine which could run CP/M as its OS.
"Even at the time that CP/M was a mature OS"
Yes, CP/M was a mature, serious OS, not just a toy. The whole microcomputer revolution was a marvel for those of us who had a use for which, up to then, a mini would have been the answer but no budget for one. People like myself, working in a lab and with previous experience with FORTRAN and punched cards on mainframes. In fact it was likely that not even a mini would have done the job that could be achieved with an S-100 box. There were all sorts of cards available such as ADCs to aid interfacing with instruments. I build a microspectrophotometer and, realising that the 9-bit ADC wasn't enough, added another 4 bits with an op-amp and a 4-bit CMOS switch and a stepping motor controlling the continuous interference filter. Microsoft FORTRAN had I/O equivalents to POKE and PEEK (PUT and GET IIRC). I'm not sure one could have added the necessary interface cards to a mini.
Some of my colleagues went on a computing course which taught Pascal so I changed to UCSD Pascal which ran on the same H/W but subsequently on an IBM PC clone. Maybe another subject for an article Liam?
"Ditto. Wordstar on a Amstrad CPC6128 did my degree dissertation."
Pampered kids!
Typewriter, editing with scissors and stapler.
And back in the day, publishing involved galley proofs and page proofs where edits had to preserve the line length to avoid having to reset entire pages. However it did save the day when I was given somebody's page proofs to read and realised there were errors converting imperial to metric (or possibly the other way about) which really mattered because it dealt with sea-level changes. They had been missed in his thesis by both his supervisor and the external examiner, by the journal editor and reviewer and in the galleys.
I wonder how many proof runs it took to get an acceptable layout. The original Unix development was effectively financed at Bell Labs as a means of WP of patent applications. A networking textbook is more hardcore than that.
OTOH try a book which has maps and photographs, keeping the text describing them onto the same or a facing page as far as possible. Add the complication of some of these being split across facing pages. That's harder core. And wondering why adding a few words at the op of a page has suddenly left a white gap at the bottom until you realise that there was no longer room for both a footnote an the paragraph that referenced it.
Complex layout is tricky. The advantage of WYSiWYG is that your proofing happens continuously on screen in front of your eyes.
And good luck to anyone wanting to do really complex layout such as splitting a map across facing pages using rules based layout. They're either going to have to be very, very good at applying the rules in their head or else use a lot of proofing runs to get good results. For that sort of writing using WYSIWYG is the equivalent of moving from punched cards and batch compiling to programming in an IDE.
if I was writing a modern replacement for "War and Peace", surely I'm interested in the words and not the fonts?
If you were writing it for self publishing you might well be more interested in fonts etc. Even more so if you were writing non fiction with a need to provide headings, sub headings, insert images and tables, keep track of references to these in the text etc. Alternatively you could use a plain text editor and then something like Scribus or InDesign to separate text from layout.
A word processor is more than a simple text editor. Both have their uses.
We had an S-100 box using cards from SD Systems. The OS was S-DOS. I'm not sure whether it was a CP/M clone, a ripped-off version or a licenced version re-branded but whatever ti was it did everything CP/M did, ran everything CP/M ran and was functionally indistinguishable. We also had a Microsoft FORTRAN compiler for it.
Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
"Put simply, because John's dev machine was a MIPS RISC box, and the firmware on that machine was white on blue.
"And in fact, his favorite editor at the time was SlickEdit, and the default text colors for SlickEdit were also white on blue.
And it's a nice bright colour to make the user feel happier.
"Company" is a collective word for people. Who are the people who comprise the company?
The directors shouldn't deceive the shareholders. The manglement shouldn't deceive the shareholders. It makes no sense to say the shareholders shouldn't deceive themselves at least not collectively and in the legal sense.
Ditto but in this case it wasn't Microsoft's update, it was Crowdstrike's, delivered by Crowdstrike's channel, not Microsoft's. It was Crowdstrike's responsibility to test before release and theirs alone and doubly so because it was applied automatically so it would be difficult for customers to test for themselves.
I don't think checking the hash would necessarily work. Create a crap file, calculate its hash and all the hash will subsequently confirm is that it's still the same crap file. It needs actual validation of the contents of the file, for instance, look to see if the memory it's about to access is legal and reject it if log an error message instead of going ahead.
The original investors in your sense would have done soe in hope of a return, either by dividends or by being able to sell their share of the company to others. The existence of those willing to by shares in the after-market are ultimately responsible for the willingness of the original investors to invest at all. And they themselves are now investors because they now own a slice of the original investment and because they were prepared to invest in it. It's unfortunate that they haven't grasped the fact that, together with the other shareholders they are members of the company they're suing. They're suing themselves.
I suppose it's just possible that this is a vehicle to get some of their investment back before it's swallowed up by customers' suits.
And for that you got a downvote?
It's beyond belief that there are commentards who can't grasp that simple fact of company law. The word company refers to the company of people who have come together to own it by buying shares in it. Unfortunately some shareholders also seem to overlook this simple fact. Sue the manglement - that's reasonable - but otherwise congratulations to the lawyers who got the shareholders to pay them (the lawyers) to sue themselves (the shareholders) to maybe get some of their (the shareholders) own money less the cost of two sets of their own lawyers. Two sets? Of course, as plaintiffs they're paying to sue and as members of the company they're paying to defend themselves against themselves.
If you follow the actual threading you will realise that I was using the "Reply" button to answer the question of why such a system would be put on the internet and the word "available" was used in that context.. Are you not familiar with manglements putting budget before everything else?
And before you start going on about the budgetary effects of being hit by ransomware, let me remind you that there may not be budget to do things right but there's always budget to fix things when they go wrong.
A monoculture - of any sort - is extremely vulnerable. At present we have something approaching that. Leaving aside any questions as to whether any other given OS might or might not be more secure that Windows the fact that it is so ubiquitous makes it a profitable target for those seeking vulnerabilities. Even if all the clients are on Windows it would be far safer for the underlying database to be run on a dedicated server running on any other OS, be it commercial Unix. Linux or a BSD and offering not other connections other than the SQL service itself. No, not even an SSH for remote admin - trading convenience for security is where the problems start.
From TFA it appears that the deployment and folding of the hindwings is linked to that of the elytra so it's a bit of a stretch to say that no power is required. It's just that it's applied to the elytra with some form of mechanical linkage to the hindwings.
The elytra are curved in profile. I wonder if they contribute lift when the hindwings are driving the beetle forwards.
So essentially somebody decided to fix what wasn't broken (or was there a scaling problem?) and do so in the most complex way they could think of. And then fail to review something which was extremely critical.
Let me guess. The developer of the original code was someone with a thorough grounding in the intricacies of certificate generation but was no longer with the company because they wanted younger, digital native, developers to work on this exciting new project.
"LockBit appeared to have 194 affiliates on its books, according to Operation Cronos, which found every single one"
What does "found" amount to here? An alias, a name and address or something in between that could be worked up into a name and address? If it's possible to identifiy them we should expect to see arrests unless they're all in Russia.