Re: History should be remembered...
There's an interesting summary further up-thread of the toing & froing of Finland's experience in the WWII period. You should read it.
42402 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"And now they would vote to remain."
Except its not an option. We cant remain, it would be rejoin
That was a typo on the A/Cs part because the poll was about rejoining.
and thats much less appealing.
Not unappealing enough for your liking, I suppose because the headline on the linked article was that the poll came out with a majority for rejoining.
All this would matter less if it weren't for the fact that web developers - ore, more likely, the developers of the frameworks they use have forgotten the KISS principle. In search of bells and whistles the idea of a universal platform and applications has been lost. Many sites (and it bugs me no end that my own NextCloud server is one of them) will only work with a limited number of browsers.
"I can measure productivity simply by checking tasks and responses are coming in on time."
And quality of the responses, no doubt.
How all of it suddenly fails in an open plan office when somebody gets a dot-matrix printer installed on the desk behind you. Obviously a long time ago, but it happened.
I did use a lab. network that was made up of 75 Ohm Coax, TV connectors & all. It consisted of a lot of little boxes with a Z80 in them, each with a D25 for RS232, daisy chained. I think it must have had a box at the other end to break it out into more D25s because at that time all you got on the back of your Unix box was serial terminal connections. Yes, it worked.
IT people have experienced those examples. You can recognise them. They're the ones burying their heads in their hands when the decision makers meet the salesmen.
What always surprises me is that the manglement are so often snake -oil merchants themselves so why can't they recognise the same thing when they see it?
"But they do sacrifice a degree of agility. If their customer base was to triple over the next three weeks, could they source, configure, and install enough hardware to cope with the additional load?
...
Comic Relief, who provisioned serverless infrastructure that facilitated the processing of tens of millions of pounds in donations from hundreds of thousands of members of the public, for less than £100"
Comic Relief hold an annual events on dates decided well in advance. If they depend on agility to plan for that they're doing it wrong.
I have, in the past, worked with marketing who probably did hope for something like a tripling of turnover in three weeks. Having failed to work out that their campaign had a small flaw they were disappointed. (It was intended to let them sell direct instead of through distributors; the customers needed to arrange an installion, however, and the installers were also the distributors.)
There's a reason why HMRC prefer this. When a company is wound up the available cash has to be distributed between all the creditors according to the debts so that if there isn't enough you only get your pro rata x pence in the pound. But some creditors are more even than others and HMRC is more even than most (I can't remember off-hand where they stand in relation to payroll).
If they HMRC initiate wind-up they'll get their full due or as much of it as there's money to support. Only then do you and the others get a share-out. If a trade creditor initiates wind-up they either need to be sure there really is enough money there or else they've effectively written off the debt and are being vindictive (or public spirited depending on your PoV).
"I'd be leaving any place that did this"
Whether it was "the place" that did it would depend on the status of Iain's colleague. If he wasn't part of the management and hadn't done it with the connivance of the management then it's not really the business that had done it.
"and if they're lucky then on my way out I may not tell their client what actually happened and agree to swear to that under oath"
Given that it was hearsay it would be you who'd be lucky, or at least wise, not to do so.
Your employer sounds a bit like my daughter's - they have an HQ in Dublin and, reputedly, a UK office whose reality she's not actually confirmed.
Slightly different story but she'd left a working from home job just before Covid for one with a stupid commute (why???!!!) which obviously turned into a work at home job for the duration. After the duration they wanted to go back to their old ways but she'd realised by then what she'd let herself in for with that job.
"a huge hit to the ego"
Not just huge hit to the ego, also some very difficult questions from investors enquiring about the cost of it all. In fact some of the public pronouncements such as the one at the centre of this article may be aimed at them as much as at employees, maybe even more so.
So he has to stick to simple stuff? It wouldn't be possible for people like him to cooperate, globally to produce something as complex as a computer operating system? And if they did it would be an impossibly buggy monstrosity, completely different to the product of teams working together in an office? OK, got that.