"It's surprisingly good even on something this low spec."
For some dubious values of "good".
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"National Service for the youth"
They seem to have taken the first episodes of Tes Minister (getting rid of rthe difficult bit in the title) and now Yes Prime Minister (national service) as a source of ideas. Did nobody tell them it was saire?
"massive pension hikes"
Anyone old enough to remember YM and YPM is probably in favour of this.
"Participants say that these enterprise agreements and the relationships they symbolize mean they are very unlikely to consider switching from [Microsoft's cloud] Azure, but they do not see them as directly inhibiting switching – just that the status quo would make switching an illogical business decision, given the benefits these agreements provide and the effort required to disentangle their infrastructure from the Microsoft ecosystem,"
That seems analogous to what any drug addict would say about their poison of choice.
Do any of their customers cite the risk of price-hikes by third parties and the cost of extrication in their annual reports? Surely they ought to.
"Progress is built on failure as evolution is built on death."
Actually, evolution is built on the survivors. The dead are collateral damage.
Evolution works be throwing enough variants against the wall to see what sticks. To do that there needs to be a lot of variants. Will ARPA-H be able to afford enough?
Also it's worth remembering evolution is quite capable of producing sub-optimal solutions. What evolution produces depends on the survivable options that it took to get to wherever it is now. There are a lot of advantages to walking upright but anyone suffering a bad back should be able to tell the Intelligent Design believers they've got it wrong. Don't follow the evolution model too closely.
And why isn't it HARPA rather then ARPA-H?
Over the span of millennia the solution to survival has been number of copies - and those may be in the form of being quoted by a later author rather than straight copies - and chance. In other words, we have the occasional copy of the occasional old text and know very well that more has been lost. That's why there's now great interest in recovering the contents of the carbonised scrolls from the House of Papyri in Herculaneum which might include texts unknown elsewhere. Ironically being buried in volcanic ash has preserved them against the usual decay of organic matter. This is still not a recommendation for carbonising your records in order to preserve them.
Here's another one which realy pisses me off - and it's seeped back into UK English.
"Give" is a perfectly good verb.
From that we obtain the noun "gift" meaning that which has been given.
Straightforward - enough? "Give", verb, "gift" noun.
No. for some reason that which has been given is suddenly a verb meaning, it appears, the exact same as its root, "give". Why?
If you use "gift" as a verb you might think you're trying to do somethin fancier or more important than if you use "give". You aren't. You're just telling me there's something amiss with your vocabulary.
I don't think anyone has a great understanding yet of *why* they transfer so well
The prerequisite to that is likely to be understanding why they're adversarial and the prerequisite to that is likely to be understanding why a given prompt produces the output that it does. Good luck with that.
However I'll throw in a wild guess as to why they're transferable: the contents of training data are too similar so if one doesn't have the maerial to create a realistic pastiche neither to any of the others.
"isibly shaking from side to side as the print head moved along"
When I was a student computers were rare and botany departments certainly didn't have one. We did have an electric Marchant calculator where the entire register moved. Everything was OK until it came to doing division when the vibration would make it move along the desk.
It's fragile to say the least. I've seen a dramatic improvement just by putting one word into the plural, simply because there were sufficient hits on place names which were in the plural to push the shrapnel down the results - but it still came up with place names rather than the sort of general results i was looking for.
"fire drills of the early days, which were more like fire evacuation drills – sprung upon a building's residents with no warning.
...
now fire drills are better planned, well-announced procedures"
Oddly enough it's the old style drills that more closely resemble actual fire alarms (and bomb alerts).
The comparisons is, actually, a false one. An evacuation drill is an exercise is responding to an alert raised by others. Phishing testing is more akin to testing response to encountering al fire outbreak or recognising a suspicious object and taking appropriate action including raising an alert.
I know some email systems add a warning to any external mail as I've seen them when my messages has been quoted in a reply. Whether that would be enough to stop some recipients clicking on links is another matter.
Meanwhile the public don't receive any training not to be phished. Far from it organisations which should know a lot better persist in training them to respond by sending emails with invitations to click, including invitations to click to log in. I remain convinced that those responsible for sending such emails would click on a link in an inbound email with the subject "This is a fraudulent phishing email" and a link labelled "This link is dangerous to click".
By all means keep running phishing tests and restrict those who fail from using any technology more advanced than a mechanical typewriter and an abacus.
I've avoided it for years.
OTOH the land past my house is categorised as a built-up area although it's a moot point as to where it ceases to be so. It's on one of several possible routes that will take you between a road with a 30 limit and a road at national speed limit without passing any speed limit signs of either sort.
"It's actually really hard to ride a two wheeled bike slow enough"
One of the Greek lecturers in QUB could ride amazingly slowly - on the road. They had all (it was a small department so not many) probably come from Oxford so they were all cyclists but he was outstanding.
" I can hear motorbikes on the road on the other side of the valley - over a mile away."
Ditto, and the level of sound seems to be inversely proportional to the power. Tracking the loud buzzing sounds it's surprising how long it takes them to cover any particular stretch or road.