Re: Attention customers
The tradition is to attempt to get it to you in the last day of your holiday, the reality is to get to you a week after you get back.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I remember one case in South Armagh back in the 70s or 80s where a remote cottage was attacked. The house owner fired a shotgun (I think I was told he fired through through the front door) and blew the attacker's brains out - at least the SOCO who'd been to the PM told me there was nothing in the skull but wasn't sure if there was anything there before.
The householder had to be arrested and it took most of the weekend to track down the relevant minister to authorise his release. AFAIK that was the end of it.
Non-profits are not necessarily what you expect them to be. Firstly a non-profit can make a surplus. It looks similar but has a different name and doesn't get distributed as a dividend to shareholders. Secondly it can pay a small governing clique very generously. However profitable it may be to them, the organisation is still a non-profit.
You have to look very carefully to check whether the non-profit is actually working in the way you hoped.
The minimum for the least serious is 3 years, the maximum for the most serious is 10. This is, in fact quite lenient compared to the UK which, IIRC is life. If sentencing is similar to the UK the sentence after a guilty plea would be at the lower end of range and possibly a plea to a lesser charge might be accepted. Doing a runner wouldn't have helped there. In the UK there would also be the possibility of sentences being run concurrently. As it never ended up in court we don't know what the outcome would have been. We don't even know if he would have pleaded nor even if he would have been found guilty if it went to trial.
AFAICR the view at the time was that he wouldn't have been extradited from Sweden so that if he'd faced the Swedish courts, either by not leaving Sweden or by being extradited that might well have been the end of it as things stood at the time. The US extradition warrant was only issued after he'd holed up in the embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden. Would it have been if he hadn't attracted so much publicity? Who knows? But he certainly made a number of bad (from his PoV) moves.
I think the technique they've used already of offering a substantial reward for "information" leading to the arrest of some of the leaders might well turn up results. A large enough some of money might tempt one criminal to remove another, eve a possible rival, for fun and profit. Go drinking in a bar in Moscow, wake up in a country with an extradition treaty with the US.
"I don't mind when big corporations get shafted, in fact I quite like it tbh."
So you don't mind if some of your pension funds investments get siphoned off by scum? Or the savings of people trying to put together a deposit on a house or for their families?
How many times do we have to spell it out? The big investors in big corporations aren't some nebulous "them". They're more likely to be us. And in this sort of attack, doubly us because it's the corporations' customer data that's being sold on to other scammers.
Even when you discount NHS data this is not victimless crime.
"as those girls spoke up many days later"
That's always a concern when investigating such allegation. However it was something that should have been settled in court, assuming the Swedish equivalent of the DPP decided to press charges. Whether or not TPTB would have decided to take it to court in the normal course of events, once he did a runner they had little alternative but to issue an extradition warrant.
"in the same way you wouldn't have a clue about the code I wrote or used when I was actually doing such stuff (many years ago)."
Many years ago I, too, was writing code. I was also, from time to time, installing latest versions of commercial S/W. If anything was going to go wrong with the running systems those were the most likely situations.
Such as the version requiring just a bit more memory but enough to push it into thrashing when presented with a live workload. (At least I got the memory upgrade I'd been requesting.)
And the long hours while the new version of an ERP was doing a database reorg while thinking "If this runs out of space we're never going to complete a restore by Monday morning".
Maintenance to fix bugs, fine - providing it doesn't introduce more. maintenance to add features nobody asked for, not so good. If something appears stable over a long period of time there's a prima facie reason to believe is is stable. Taking it apart become some "competent authority" doesn't like the way it's structured or not written in their favoured "safe" language or whatever is very likely to result in problems where none existed previously.
Name a competent authority.
Tell me if this is in need of a fix. Apart from a documentation update this year it was last updated in 2016: https://repo.or.cz/nvi.git
My view is that it comes under the heading of "finished", "complete" or whatever you might wish to call it as opposed to vim which never seems to be finished.
Ripping and replacing working code is not without cost. It's not for nothing that we keep saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Just because nobody's updated a library for a long time doesn't mean it's in need of updates; it may mean it's not in need of updates. Your "unsupported" might be someone else's "finished".
I agree W95/NT/W2K do look like a starting off point. However I'm not sure to what extent they were a direct inspiration or a parallel evolution from CDE and/or other ideas. Certainly the KDE name seems to have been inspired by CDE.
It wouldn't be surprising to find the designs of desktop environments evolving separately but on similar lines to respond to the same existing ideas and the same thoughts as to where they might go next. Unity and W8, both attempting to follow mobile UIs are a case in point with Unity just preceding Windows in that case. And the idea of a dock or menu bar occupying just the middle of the bottom of the screen as in what I've seen of macOS & W11 looks to me to ba a throwback to CDE which in turn was derived from ideas variously found in UIs of DEC, IBM and the one I was familiar with, HP's VUE.
TL;DR What goes around comes around.
"Tech ignorami are the prime reason we're stuck in The Dark Age of Computing."
This is one of you more coherent statements. Let's examine it.
I don't think you understand the concept of what were refereed to as the Dark Ages.
This is a label applied by historians to a period which was dark to them because they didn't know what was happening then due to a lack of the lack of written sources (or a disregard for such sources as were available). I don't think that term is used any more. Rather we have terms such as "Post-Roman" or Early Medieval". To the extent that the term can be used at all it's post hoc - what was happening during the period was perfectly obvious to those living at the time. It's not for us to judge whether future generations of computer history will lack for records but it seems extremely unlikely.
"Is a multinational more powerful than a multi-nation trading block?"
I'm not sure it's even a contest. Nations and multi-nation trading blocks make their own laws. Multinational corporations need to follow those laws in the nations (and blocks) in which hey wish to trade. There's absolutely nothing new about that. If they don't want to follow the rules, at least with regard to some particular product or service, they don't offer it there. It's entirely up to them to work out their own trade-offs. No winners, no losers, each doing its own thing.