Re: which began in Thunderbird 102 and continued in the previous release.
They lost the plot when they split browser and mail/news client apart. I suppose enshitification is easier if kept separate.
40470 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
It doesn't seem to be accessible from the Settings menu in Firefox. Go to about:config instead.
There isn't much contrast between the slider an background on the scroll bar. It really needs a proper 3D setting to outline it but I suppose that's forbidden by the style police these days. I think I'll keep using Seamonkey as email and main browser until they break that (the calendar is already starting to rot).
At least they're consistent. If they don't believe the risk was serious then it's reasonable to believe they didn't need to defend against it.
Perhaps their response could be taken as escalating the seriousness to the point where a fine is appropriate. Even so it doesn't make sense for one part of the public sector to be fining another. It's not an easy situation but one that needs to be looked at in terms of how to tackle this in future. Perhaps a requirement that an admonition to a public body should reult in a note being placed on the personal records of senior officers, sufficient to block any salary increases or promotions for some years and a requirement that it should be mentioned on their CVs when applying for any other job in the public sector.
This is where the genuine consultant comes into play; one who goes round, listening to the little people because they actually know what goes on, and presents it along with a substantial invoice. Because the information is now more expensive than it was it must now be more valuable and heeded. Price = Value.
"And if ever an outfit qualified for full understanding of its market, it's Microsoft.
So when it causes what looks like random suffering to its customers, we must assume it's deliberate."
Obviously - except that it's not random.
The understanding is simple. Having established a monopoly and terrified its victims customers about the prospect of jumping ship it can then screw them as hard and as often as it likes wherever there's a chance of increasing revenue.
Developers are just collateral damage.
I think Steven's problem is going to what sounds like an old fart's conference (I speak as a very old fart myself) and being surprised to find himself surrounded by old farts and specifically those of the conference-going variety. If there are any Linus clones beavering away somewhere would they have been invited? Would they have the funds to go if invited? If they were funded to go would they have stayed after taking a quick look at what was on offer?
"1. they're paid for it (in which case it's not really open source, as originally conceived,"
AFAICS it was originally conceived, in the main, by people in academia who were being "paid", either actual payments or students on whatever student maintenance was applicable. I don't think it was conceived as being the province of any group more restricted than "those able to contribute". Those being paid by, e.g. Intel may be paid to come up with a specific product for their employer. But the academic or student also has a product in mind - the usual academic product of a publication to enhance their career. It's just that releasing a FOSS is an alternative form of publication to the usual academic paper.
Some readers will be aware of a large glass walled building on the Leeds ring road. One of the firms occupying it was a call centre that used to get regular hoax bomb threats. Our evacuation route was supposed to be out of the back door, along the path running beside the all glass gable end to an assembly point of the front lawn. Having come from a situation where my work had had a genuine bomb (and subsequently half destroyed by a genuine fire) I made it clear that whatever the probability of the threat being a hoax there was no way I was going to evacuate by any other route than out of the back door and as straight a line as possible as perpendicular to the building as possible and as a far away as possible.
"It took a long time to identify a safe place to take the kids for the rest of the day, and I stayed on to help supervise/entertain them."
It might have been worth tipping off the local fire officer. I'm not sure evacuation planning would be in their remit but it might have been and he'd probably have been able to leave TPTB with the distinct impression that the school would have to be closed if they didn't get their fingers out.
"Some old boxes are very hard to kill."
Most things made by HP in their days of glory* were hard to kill. Things made now are hard to resist killing.
* except, for some reason, their DAT tape changers. We got through several of those over the course of a couple of years or so.
Pheasants seem to be the most suicidal birds. My dad used to ride to work by motorbike and stopped to pick up one that had jjust been hit by the car in front.
I noticed one day the side of the M! down about Northants/Beds had a lot of dead pheasants at the side of the road. I decided stopping to collect one wouldn't be a good idea.
"80%, frankly, just isn't good enough for something being enforced by law."
See my post above - 80% seems pretty good!
"I see someone is going around downvoting anyone with valid criticisms of regulations implemented before the tech is ready."
Last time I looked this was primarily an IT site. One of the things a good developer learns (or used to!) is to question "what if" at very frequent intervals. What if the disk is full? What if the user enters an unexpected response? What happens if the item on an order gets nicked after it's been picked? If there are no good answers to these questions the software delivered will be at best unable to cope with the real world and more likely extremely buggy.
It's troubling when posts asking such obvious get downvoted in an IT forum.
If you can't produce a positive response (I'm assuming a lot of this activity is shilling) go back to your clients and tell them there are some serious issues they need to deal with PDQ.
My new car also has one of those sign readers. Half the time or more it shows its "don't know" indication. I've seen it register a sign correctly and then go to "don't know" a few seconds later. At one local cross-roads a national speed limit road crosses a 40 road. Approaching from the former there's a NSL sign opposite for the other half of the road. It sees than and registers it even when turning onto the 40. I've also seen it show 30 on a NSL dual carriageway & 60 in a 30 area.
But the biggest difficulty is working out iif and where speed limits change in the lanes. Past our house it's a turn off from a 30 road & still 30 with street lights etc. Then the street lights stop. No sign. What's the speed limit? Turn left at the next junction and eventually arrive at a junction with a 30 road. Street lights start a few hundred metres before but no sign. Carry on instead and arrive at a cross roads where there is a street light, part of a sequence to the right & straight ahead. Turn left and no more street lights. What's the speed limit? A mile or so later it joins a road which is undoubtedly NSL but there are no signs. Instead of left turn carry straight on. After a few hundred metres the street lights stop. No sign. What's the speed limit? Carry on and join the same NSL road. Convrsely, of course, you can turn off the NSL road & end up on 30 roads without encountering a sign. Where do the speed limits start and stop?
How will it deal with crossing the Irish border with MPH on one side & KPH on the other?
BYW does anyone know if stretches of the A75 still have signs with different speed limits for HGVs & other vehicles?
"It reflects a deficiency in the model's ability to accurately and uniquely respond to the prompts provided."
Not a singular prompt but prompts in the plural. Maybe prompts in general? I think that tells you all you need to know about deploying it in any situation where an accurate answer might be required.
The erro in the logic, of course is that disregard for customers means fewer customers and fewer customers means fewer purchases. Trying to squeeze more money from those fewer purchases leads to even fewer customers.
Never mind. It'll still be good for another few quarters.