Re: I wonder...
The real problem here is that head of state and head of government are, AFAICS, combined.
42414 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Taking action just provides him with something onto which he can divert blame for the inflation he'll cause. It probably takes more courage, however. I suppose, of course, they could just tell him outright why they're quite happy to let him burn his house down and they're not going to lift a finger to help him nor to hide the fact that he's the arsonist. But I suppose it's beyond a politician anywhere to not be seen to react.
"GenAI workloads are going to be somewhat resistant to increases in the cost of power overall, given the capex cost of the Nvidia systems themselves at cluster and supercluster scale, and the substantial investment in state-of-the-art datacenter facilities to house and power them. "
Sounds like sunk costs to me.
"Until Linux offers a unified desktop UI API, backwards compatibility, and ends its ideological hate for commercial software, it won't be able to replace Windows regardless how much Nadella cripples it."
You should give it a try. What is this unified desktop API you're looking for that doesn't exist. What would it let me do that my disktop doesn't currently do? Who are what is this Linux that holds opinions such as idealogical hatred? It's only people who have idealogical hatreds - and it comes steaming out of that sentence I quoted.
"They revert back to widows and then, because I appear to be an expert, call me up when they can't do something "
If they revert there's no support. That's the rule. Stick to it.
OTOH my CiL's 50 something Windows-using children find they can use her Zorin if they need to so it's not all youngsters who are stuck.
"if I were travelling to some country like Israel where they routinely scan visitors' computers without permission"
Something like a Chromebook would be the solution to that. Not an actual Chromebook because you'd want to connect to your own server. You could then give one set of credentials to security and use something completely different for work.
To clarify that - just in case you want to send it back. Alternatively set up dual boot. Then occasionally you can boot up the Windows partition so you can point and laugh.
It's work knowing you can update those cheapos. SWMO's own laptop has a dodgy M/B and the W2K era one she's using now is really slow. But I was worrying that something really cheaped out might not have access to a boot menu.
"IT departments must press the upgrade button rather than pay exorbitant fees for extended support,"
What are the actual of cost of ongoing support compared with buying new H/W to replace kit which is functioning quite satisfactorily? I'm sure MS would prefer to keep what in effect becomes a subscription going as opposed to the one-off price of a W11 "perpetual" licence and will price it accordingly. They win, customers lose a bit, MS's old H/W buddies lose substantially. Once the subscription habit is ingrained W12 can become subscription only.
"In 2017, then British Home Secretary Amber Rudd emphasized the need to get people who "understand the necessary hashtags" talking."
She must have mastered her brief. According to Wikipedia she was last seen touting herself as a consultant in cybersecurity. Interesting read there about her early career in finance...
"Not only is he one of the founders of game developer Treyarch, which was acquired by Activision and became one of the studios behind the Call of Duty franchise, but he's also the president of Skydance Interactive, a Skydance Media subsidiary that develops VR apps and video games for the media giant. Oh - and Akemann also holds a PhD in mathematics from UC Berkeley."
But a bit short in the common sense department.
Once the smoke has cleared in 4 years time it might be a good idea for the US to look at their constitution and ask if it needs a few more safeguards built in.
It's common to say of the UK that it doesn't have a written constitution* but it is flexible. At the time America went on its merry way the UK had made a lot of progress in separating the roles of head of state and head of government and continued to do so. The US seems stuck in that past, indeed I'm not sure its as far advanced as the UK was at that time.
* It's not all written in one place but there are a lot of separate Acts of Parliament which together go a long way to amount to one and a whole lot more in court judgments about common law. Fortunately there's enough flexibility left for it to keep evolving.
"Yes it would hurt, but it would make Trump look like a complete idiot, and that's worth something."
No. It would give Trump a chance to blame somebody - everybody - else. The sensible thing would have been to do nothing at all, let the increased prices take their toll with nobody to blame but himself. Now he can point to all these other countries being nasty to the poor old US.
Nobody imposes tariffs on other countries. They impose them on their own residents who buy the products of those other countries. Governments allegedly imposing tariffs on the US should remember that. But hysteria is catching.
"Police's data is considered especially sensitive in Northern Ireland, where many officers never reveal their job or role, even to family members, because of the tension with local Irish nationalists who do not believe the region should be under British control."
When I lived there I reckoned on the risks coming equally from the prods and would expect they still do.
1. If the defendant has (been coerced into) pleading guilty then neither judge nor jury has any role in reaching a verdict. As some of the victims were in that position why are you blaming judges in those cases?
2. If the defendant pleads not guilty and opts for a jury trial it is the jury, not the judges who reach a verdict.
3. If the defendant pleads not guilty and opts for a summary trial then it is the judge's role to reach a verdict. That verdict can only be based on the evidence put before the court. I'm only familiar with judge-only trials in the so-called Diplock procedure in NI. There the judge gave a fully reasoned verdict, based on the evidence.
4. I'm not sure as to the balance between 2 & 3 but I'm sure someone with a handle like VoiceOfTruth will be able to provide authoritative figures on this despite the lapse in knowledge about court procedure..
5. Whatever the form of trial the judge's role is to remain impartial, and not imagine what they think the evidence should have been in areas where they have no technical knowledge. Thank goodness,