Re: Perhaps...
Microsoft is impervious to messages. You are going to have AI whether you want it or not and you are going to pay for it.
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Off the shelf pensions systems probably have built-in assumptions such as employee and/or employer makes contributions, contributions are invested and at the end the accrued value of the contributions is used to buy bonds or the like to pay out the pension due.
The CS pension scheme differs from a Ponzi scheme only in so far as not only are there no investments there are no contributions either, the employee is on a salary sacrifice without it actually being called that, especially as we're now going to make salary sacrifice schemes pay NI. As Ponzi schemes are illegal I can't imagine anyone offering an off the shelf solution.
By doing things differently the govt. has cut itself off from COTS opportunities.
"to ensure the transition is a success"
If you launch something with the number of faults listed here it's a failure. It might come as something as a surprise to the Cabinet Office to be told that failure is not success but they certainly need to be told.
Fortunately my CS pension is already in payment and not with the main UK CS and its site appears to be unchanged so not in scope for this mess. Perhaps UK CS should have asked N Ireland CS to run the scheme for them.
"We appreciate the patience and understanding of those affected."
Typical non-apology. Why do these mouthpieces assume those affected are patient and understanding? Why do they think they're entitled to patience and understanding?
I can only assume that they speak a language which uses words which look as if they're English words but which are not and have non-English meanings.
"Maybe the open source community could provide a standard licence under which the big fix and associated tests could be provided an/ord tested by another corporation without attracting a liability or obligation for the corporation(s) involved."
You mean something like one of the GPLs, or MITS, or Apache, or even one of the BSDs?
"The CNCF ecosystem"
CNCF: Cloud Native Computing Foundation
It lists a lot a members, including gold and platinum membership. This means solid money being paid in by companies that need it to work and/or want their names up there as Good Guys. It advertises coursed and certifications which probably bring in more money. At least on the face of it there appears to be a route in for money which could be spent to support the work at the coal face.
So where does that money go? Big conferences? PR? Project director salaries? Developers working on the projects?
"She is also required to disable and avoid LLMs in every possible way for client privacy. If Microsoft make an LLM compulsory at the OS level she may well be required to upgrade to something without AI."
It depends on the wit of the employer. If Microsoft make some aspect of it compulsory they can simply argue it's impossible and provided she continues to get rid of what's possible she can't do more. Businesses can be very creative in avoiding long-overdue change.
" but that would be true even with POTS"
No, POTS has a big UPS at the switch (exchange). The footway cabinet taking a digital feed from the cabinet and adding it to the line may well have a UPS, otherwise there's be no point it the consumer having a UPS for their router. But POTS just keeps working through the outage.
Sure, the DECT base unit dies but the line-powered phone I retained because of that doesn't. Hence I was able to dial 105 on Saturday to be told that, once more, I was one of over 2,000 households who'd just lost power because their non-redundant (they didn't actually mention that bit) overhead line had failed again.
"The point is you don't know until you try."
I'd be hard pushed to use the bandwidth I already have so I deeply resent some marketroidi telling me I'd "enjoy" more when they can't get off their arses to provide an adequate FTTC service. It's not as if they're going to roll out FTTP to those customers who they're already failing. They're just going round and round the easiest customers to supply to make themselves look good.
Where one council doesn't have housing to administer that may simply be at that tier, some other tier may have housing obligations covering that area.
"Adult Social care and other central grant funded obligations have very odd accounting processess, and the number of transactions is large and complex."
One would hope that these processes are followed uniformly everywhere otherwise one might start hearing about post-code lotteries. You have made the best possible case for a standard module to be not just available but used by every council at whatever tier that has that responsibility.
Module is the operative word in this. Given a series of modules to cover the various functions a council could use a mix of them appropriate to its responsibilities.