"I'll let you know if we have anything to share."
Not a working system, obviously. Anything else?
42420 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Could you explain what your solution should be? Are we to ditch the GFA & re-erect border posts? Or should Ireland have left with us so we could have a Britain/Ireland customs union to avoid customs posts? Do you genuinely believe that the rest of the world has to adapt itself to your Little England thinking? Or what?
Fleece? Brexiteers will probably insist that "we" voted for it, conveniently ignoring the fact that more than half the UK population didn't. Except they won't, they'll insist that this wasn't the Brexit they voted for although nobody quite knows what was.
"Plasma 6 is now at the stage where the team is restoring features and options lost in the major upgrade to the Qt 6-based release."
The one feature I'd like to see restored was lost at either the 3/4 ot 4/5 transition (I can't remember which).
It used to be possible to set a corner as the hot spot to unhide an auto-hidden panel. Now it's just the edge. It means that the panel bobs back up* as soon as the cursor overshoots the edge.
* Other directions are available if you site the panel on some edge other than the bottom.
"Getting curly braces on an Italian keyboard, for example, require EMacs-style key combinations."
That's going to be a pain in C-like languages. It may be why Pascal allows (*....*) as a replacement for {...}. Looking at it again and taking some of your other replies into consideration perhaps what I read in your OP wasn't what you intended to say.
"And converted exceptions to function boolean return codes."
I did that very briefly. You just have to grasp the idioms of any language to use it properly.
However kudos for your C programmer for returning error codes; s many applications these days give me the impression that many programmers just assume it'll all work fine and plough on regardless.
"Object Pascal is clear enough that anyone understanding object-orientated concepts can pick it up pretty quickly."
And anyone not understanding OO concepts will pick thoe up pretty quickly at the same time. That was my experience although it did help that I'd used UCSD Pascal years earlier.
This was my last gig before retiring and up to then I'd been Informix database and tools. The client decided that Delphi was too old-hat or something and decided to rewrite the application for their flagship contract in C# or C++, can't remember which. The team kept growing and growing by the time I left. My view was that what we'd been doing in Delphi on other contracts was sufficiently flexible that it could have been extended with much less work. I doubt management really understood what they'd got.
I later heard they lost that contract although I believe some dubious shenanigans to do with re-letting the contract were involved. They now are no more.
"Nobody knows Pascal apart from him."
This is certainly untrue. It may be that there are no people with Pascal skills whom you know. Or possibly there are no people you know that you know have Pascal skills that you're aware of.
However Pascal was designed as a teaching language so it should be easy to learn although IME it's at just the worst distance from C to make learning one from the other tricky.
Also once your mate retires he could have a nice little earner maintaining all his old stuff.
I think some of these things have been picked up from phones. As Liam said, what makes no sense in landscape makes sense in portrait. On a phone there isn't space to provide a conventional menu bar so wrapping it up into a long drop-down format makes the same functionality available and useable irrespective of the icon at the top. It would also make sense in the side bar of a complex GUI. OTOH in landscape I want to see a menu bar and under no circumstances do I want to see a ribbon.
I see no reason why the menu structure can't be defined as a non-visual object and interpreted by a TUI or GUI interface of the user's choosing - even a ribbon.
"Assuming there is logic to all of this, and Trump wants to deliver his promises of making foreigners pay"
But import tariffs do not make foreigners pay. They make the importer pay and that gets passed on to the ultimate purchaser a home. I suppose he could try export tariffs to make the foreigners pay...
Once upon a time the UK had this great idea, which seems to have become an EU idea as well, that the best way to grow a semiconductor industry was tariffs on components but they missed out components on pre-built boards. As anyone looking at a populated PCB knew the components on any one board came from multiple countries. Until the miraculous day dawned when the entire semiconductor BoM could be sourced from the UK any PCB assembler would be paying tariffs to bring in some of the components from abroad. Result - not that much of a PCB assembly industry in the UK, therefore not much of a home market for a semiconductor industry therefore not much of a semiconductor industry; that day never dawned.
TL;DR It's been tried before. It predictably didn't work then. It'll predictably not work now.
"Do people still print things?"
We no longer print handouts for my wife's patchwork class but that's only because the class members no have to print their own copies. That change was mad when the class went to Zoom for the duration of lockdown.
Why print? For one thing it would not be feasible to bring laptops to the class but mostly because they include the essential paper templates that are part of the patchwork process.
Why take a loss in the US? Sell what you can sell there and make up for the loss by selling more in ROTW? If you start to play games such as trying to cross-subsidise the US market you'll end up selling less than your competitors who are smarter, ratchet up your prices more to compensate, sell less still and either catch on or disappear up your own fundament. The ROTW doesn't owe the US a living whatever Trump thinks.
My guess would be that the little guy who's selling products to real customers is less likely to trip up over GDPR. The little guy who's a data aggregator like the one in the states who got pwned and now deserves to be sued to oblivion along with his progeny to the 10th generation - he deserves to be not just tripped up by grabbed by one of those leg-breaking man-traps.
Agreed. It would take a skeptic at board level who's prepared to ask questions like "I just bought one of our cars and now I'm seeing lots of adverts for it which are obviously irrelevant. Can you explain to me why you think this isn't a waste of the advertising budget which we give you?".
* Or any other expensive and hence rarely purchased product.
This is the amazing thing. We regularly get commentards banging on about corporates can't use FOSS applications because of lack of support and yet the distinguishing feature of Microsoft support seems to be a monthly supply of apparently lottery of patches which may fix things and may break others.
To emphasise the point: a corporate - and anyone else - can make mods and not submit them upstream but would then have to incorporate them into later versions. That might be no more than a recompile from source providing the relevant source file was unchanged upstream in later versions. I did that myself for years when Wine decided that 24 bit video could be treated as 32 bit (it couldn't & shouldn't and broke a lot of applications in consequence).