"Economic sanctions are a lever allied nations love to pull when it comes to imposing costs on malign states, yet Microsoft seemed unwilling or unable to offer any substantial ideas for building on these."
Firewalls?
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
I'm not sure PCs will go away. A long time ago computing meant a central server, mainframe or mini with terminals. That meant it was limited to those businesses which could justify that sort of setup or could have some standardised facility such as payroll serviced by a bureau. PCs extended it to businesses that couldn't afford that and individuals and, by their flexibility, to use cases that the central services didn't meet. Cloud and web have extended the central server option to anyone willing to pay a subscription and who accept, or perhaps are overlook lock-in. But fashions come and go so it's likely that cloud will come to be seen as just as inflexible as the centralised systems of old and the flexibility of the PC will see it return in some form or other.
"or your hardware doesn't have the linux drivers then you are screwed!"
If it doesn't have drivers because the H/W's too new then they'll be along any time soon but then you'll not be in the wavering about upgrading 10 to 11 group anyway. If it doesn't because it's too old then how on Earth can you be running Windows because Linux has the reputation of supporting older hardware than Windows.
And you can always try running your irreplaceable Windows app under Windows of your choice in an isolated VM for safety.
Basically you have 3 choices. Put up with Windows until Microsoft finally screw you irretrievably. Use Mac if that does what you want. Look a how to make Linux work for you. But stop beefing about Windows and then complaining Linux isn't Windows.
Why would she want something that behaved so badly? As regards cosmetics, anything with KDE - there's a stack of themes that will make it look like any version of Windows you want. The menu is configurable so you can set up the completely mad W10 version in place of the nicely organised version. Of course she'll insist updates are broken because they can't possible have worked in that time.
In one of his books, more likely The Design of Design rather than TMMM, Brookes said the architect was the representative of the user. I get the impression that Jobs performed that role at Apple. It had to be good enough to get past him.
It's quite clear to me, on my very limited experience, that nobody has done that at Microsoft for a very long time if ever. Even things like an animated GIF rather than a proper progress bar while the actual progress figures go 0% for several minutes, 4% for 2 seconds, 99% for about 10 seconds and 100% for a very long time indeed seem acceptable because there's nobody in charge to summon the developer responsible, ask him to explain himself, tell him it's not acceptable and to go back and fix it.
What seems to be the case at Microsoft is that that figure has been replaced by a representative of the company looking to see how well this feature can be monetised. Different units are competing to get their product in on that basis. The fact that the overall product doesn't really meet merchantable standards doesn't matter; it doesn't need to; they have a monopoly with their customers' balls in a vice.
My one and only W10, which I keep more or less as a curiosity, has achieved that with this month's update. It will boot - slowly - to display the desktop but not respond. The lights are on but there's nobody at home. It's completely secure at last. Of course the dual boot Devuan is just fine.
The closest we can get to a momento mori icon seems appropriate.
It's not surprising to see governments rowing back on climate change. It was easy a decade or more ago to set goals - even in legislation - for targets way down the road. They were far away to be SEP. Although logically it would require government action, possibly unpopular government action to meet them but they were still far enough away to let them be SEP. Now we're getting closer. The action hasn't been taken. To even get close to meeting them action would have to be taken Right Now. Aspiration is no longer enough and inspiration is lacking.
"And of course, I'll never buy another Honeywell device again."
I made that decision based on the one that came built-in 3 houses ago. It was supposed to have a miniscule power drain so that the battery would last for years. They lasted a few months and when they failed defaulted to ON, particularly when we were on holiday or in the middle of the night in a heatwave.
Don't expose sensitive data. You'd probably want to have it accessible from more than one terminal. You'd probably also want to have internet access. Keep the sensitive data on its own intranet isolated from the network that's internet-connected. Inconvenient? Possibly. More convenient than getting pwned? Certainly.
"And on those rare occasions when you have to use a public charger you plug the car in and go do something else while it charges."
First find one that's not being used. Maybe easy when EVs are a small part of the fleet. Not so easy if they replace ICEs completely. The EV's use case is local trips. The ICE's use case is any trip you care to make.
Well it depends on the size of the meters. The pressure meter* on the carbon dating system in the old Belfast lab was at least 6 inches across, the pressure meter on my central heating system is only about 1 inch.
*Weird thing - IIRC it went round about 3 times so it had an effective scale length of getting on for a metre.
"As the article states though, it does seem pretty unlikely they will actually retire it."
It would take a while. First the treaty has to be ratified - TFA says next year. Then it has to be formally handed over. Then - and this might be the big one - ISO has to change the standard. Only then does the 5 year retirement interval start.
"I'll stick with a desktop, really big screens for aging eyes"
17" screen laptop for my ageing eyes. Multiple desktops under KDE makes it effectively bigger as far as having more applications open is concerned.
"a proper work surface"
I can't remember when I last saw a proper work surface. All the stuff stacked on it, yes, surface no.
This is only one of five possibilities. The other are: 1. Those who need W11 for insurance are already on it. 2. As LVPC above says, most PCs can run W11. Some of those users will simply upgrade to 11 when pushed and no sooner. 3. Also as LVPC says some will pay for extended W10 support rather than buy a new PC. 4. Heave a sigh of relief that the damn thing isn't going to get yet another upgrade that ties it in knots and/or removes something that was depended upon.