Re: At a previous orkplace..
"Bill your company for overnight safe custody services."
And for the physiotherapy for back problems due to standing all the time.
42530 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
Back in the days when you took a film to a shop to get developed a& printed (D & P) the company actually did this. As the mother was a well-known BBC newsreader the company and police got enough attention to make them wish they'd engaged their brains before taking it further.
When deterrence fails there's always preventative detention. The reality is that there'll always be criminality. You can't take a blanket approach and say "creating this new criminal offence will deal with it". That's the legislator's approach and at best it doesn't work and at worst it has bad side effects that should have been obvious. The sad fact is that you have to deal with individual cases, detect them, try them and then work out what's the best - rehabilitation, some form of punishment that should be a deterrent or simply removing from society for a long period to protect that society.
As it's not a controlled experiment we have no evidence as to the extent that earlier extreme punishment acted as deterrence or not. The contrary factor influencing behaviour was extreme poverty.
What's wrong here is that you - and Starmer, and many more - are seeking to treat the symptoms. The images are a symptom of the harm done to the victims. Simply attempting to hide them is closing the eyes to the original harm and thus letting it continue. What should be done is to identify those responsible, charge them, try them and, if convicted, give them deterrent sentences.
It's not specifically Starmer. The digital ID thing has been a Labour aspiration for the last 3 decades or so. Cameron's government celebrated the 800th anniversary year of the signing of Magna Carta by a new Investigatory Powers Act to further screw down on the presumption of innocence.
"will it run on Windows?"
In this case the appropriate question "will it run on MacOS?"
Let's look at T'bird:
Email client
Address book*
Calendar*
RSS reader
Usenet reader
Follows open standards
What's missing?
Obedience to Microsoft lock-in with their closed standards but if you're looking to break out of Microsoft lock-in why would you want it?
* Both these use open standards to sync with servers
The reason I suggested individual claims via the small claims court is that they would have to send someone to court to argue this - and argue it against the fact that it was their deliberate choice to brick it. That's going to cost more than simply making a refund.
libre office doesn't have an equivalent to outlook or any kind of email client.
It's debatable as to whether this is the best approach (after all, it enables people like yourself to make comments like that) but AIUI their position is that it enables users to make a choice. There was some discussion about taking Thunderbird under their wing when its position under Mozilla looked shaky. Personally I wish they'd taken over SeaMonkey and wrapped in an entire browser/email/RSS readerUsenet reader/calendar package.
As it is, users can add TBird or something else as they choose.
From TFA "Avoiding overinflated expectations? Even a politician could do that."
I know it's an ironic and rhetorical question but it's worth looking at the politicians involved.
Again from TFA:
"Peter Kyle, the then Technology Secretary" Geography, International Development, and Environmental, doctorate in Community Development. Succeeded by Liz Kendall, 1st in history.
"the Minister for Digital Government and Data confirmed that internal pilots of in-house productivity tools had been paused after they had been 'superseded by more modern, widely available platforms,' without specifying which ones." That's Ian Murray, Social Policy and Law. "joini[ed] an arts-based internet TV station as the Operations Director." That sounds better. "Following the collapse of the company" Oops.
The consultant told them what they could have found out by asking their own staff, true. But the staff are paid far less than the consultant so what they'd have told them would have been seen as less valuable. If you have senior manglement who only evaluate sources of information based on what they pay for them this is the only way they get the information they need. Don't blame the consultant, he's only doing his job. Blame the manglement who aren't doing theirs.
"t could be argued that they are heavily biased in favour of persons with decent powers of recollection and the ability to regurgitate answers without needing to understand the topic."
Also the ability to write quickly but legibly.
Two solutions here, however. 1. Poison the web with incorrect answers and watch out for regurgitation in the answers. 2. hold all exams inside Faraday cages or spaces with jammers operating.
"I was taught to shoot, .22 rifle from the age of 12"
I suppose I also might have been taught to shoot early - dad was a notable poacher in his younger years. However, when I was born he got rid o his shotgun so I grew up unused to being around firearms. On the whole I wouldn't swap your early exposure to my lack of it; it might have saved by life some decades later.
One day a rifle which had been dug up was brought into the Lab for examination. I was called down to reception and asked to take a soil sample from it (complete nonsense!). As with the very few other times something like that came up I was very circumspect with it, having no background with such things. In the canteen couple of weeks later one of the firearms examiners casually mentioned that it had been found to be booby trapped. A shotgun booby-trapped in much the same way had exploded in a police station down-town killing two officers a little while back.
After that they brought in a rule that all firearms presented for examination had to be X-rayed before being brought into the Lab.
"We flew from Brize Norton to Aldergrove courtesy of the RAF"
It was always Northolt in my experience. If we had to go to/from London and one of the ministers or NIO London-based civil service bigwigs had a RAF plane flight booked we were supposed to use that. It could be inconvenient - car parked at RAF side of Aldergrove, civil side for the return flight.
AIUI the Peter Principle is slightly different. They get promoted up the same skill ladder until they get to a position that requires more skills than they have. The difference here is that because of not having that ladder at all the promotion is into what is into something requiring a skill set orthogonal to that which they hold.
"But in general, everyone is battening down the hatches, running light, fewer people, fewer products, core activity only, expecting more economic crap ahead"
Quite apart from geo-politics that's just positive feedback accentuating what happens. It's the way economies work. Geo-politics set the direction, boom or bust. Unfortunately those in geopolitics don't realise that.
Making the move from science to IT I was pushed out from the office to a client site in the middle of the first week because one of the two on-site staff had left to go freelance and they were afraid if they didn't fill the chair PDQ the client might not let them fill it (at least that's the explanation I got). It wasn't the project I'd been recruited for either. After a few weeks the other of the original pair also left and I was for a time the only one on site and even when someone else was added I was still the team leader. We had a visit from the account manager and twice yearly reviews in the office but that was all.
"Many managers do not get the job because they were good at doing what their subordinates are now doing."
I'm not sure about this one. ISTM that people get promoted to management because there is no technical promotion ladder. It becomes the only way of rewarding them for technical achievement - by transferring them to a job which has different technical requirements that they don't necessarily have. It's like promoting a chemist to accounts because they're a good chemist (or vice versa). It ends up with the work being done by those who are too inexperienced or inept at it to be promoted to management and managed by those who would do the job better but have no competence at management. No wonder we refer to them as "manglement".
Just in case somebody is still reading this thread (been on holiday for a while):
the user id is a mobile phone number
FTFY
If you look at their video of setting things up you can use a burner phone to set up Signal on a computer which is the recommendation if you're security consious. It's only the mobile number if you use it on a phone. Yes, a phone is convenient. It's the old trade-off - why by secure when you can use something convenient?