Re: you could see people start to pull over thinking it was the law.
"traffic reports"
No EON?
40471 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
OTOH he's telling the world - and that includes potential customers - that AWS won't deploy its software to support remote working. What if those businesses want to support remote working for themselves? Might they take the view that "won't" means "can't"? Might they wonder if, by not using it themselves, AWS might produce a sub-optimal product.
It's a far more convincing sales story for a large IT business to demonstrate that it eats its own dog-food.
"Demanding payment and securing it by disabling a computer system until you get paid has previously been ruled to be a crime."
I doubt that any cloud vendor cutting off a customer for non-payment is going to get a criminal conviction. And way back in the 80s/90s it was SOP for the packages to require a key to be entered to enable operation for another year. Circumstances alter cases.
What was annoying about one company was that they'd display a message on every user terminal. As we had a serial link between that and another system in order to look things up it wasn't welcome for an unexpected message to come down the line. In the end we understood how their files were structured and read them directly.
You'd need to have a court rule on it. I wouldn't bet my freedom on a ruling that it isn't a computer, not when the functions have been explained, including the fact that it could be logged into, wiped, reprogrammed etc. Even more so when you reflect it may well include server functions such as DHCP..
"She could have stepped straight out of a 70s spy movie. It kinda made up for some of the angst."
You didn't realise she was the real chief and the other guy was just a front man? And haven't you noticed the same cars following you around ever since?
If the company doing the repair or refurbishment is big enough to be VAT registered then they're obliged to charge VAT to the customer. They'll also reclaim VAT on their purchases so it makes no difference as to whether VAT's charged on components. The most effective way of dealing with this would be to make repair and refurbishment zero-rated services which would mean the the business can be VAT registered, reclaim VAT on its purchases but not charge VAT* to the customer.
Technically they do, but it's zero.
James Lilley, Openreach's Managed Customer Migrations Manager, defended the company's decision.
"As copper's ability to support modern communications declines, the immediate focus is getting people onto newer, future-proofed technologies."
Copper's ability to maintain basic communications, OTOH, is underpassed. In the event of a power failure the newer technologies aren't even present-proofed. There's no way of holding this smug git typical BT manager to account.
How many businesses will take kindly to replacing a till because Microsoft tells them to? Assuming any of the tills are still functioning. This is just a special case of taking some piece of specialised equipment and then tying its life to that of a piece of S/W. In this case it might have met its H/W EoL first.
It's not just the cost of excavation. It's also the cost of going through so many cubic metres of waste looking for a hard-drive. Either that would have to be done by hand, expensive even with cheap labour* or there'd be the cost of designing and building a custom machine for the job.
* Add in the security guards to make sure that if one of the cheap labour found it they didn't pocket it. And then more guards to watch the guards.
"sysadmin complaints"
Is it complaints or a matter of feasibility?
Personally I'm pissed off by the multiplicity of sites that want to tell me that I can't use my preferred browsers, mostly, I suspect, because it's the authors of frameworks such as PHP that can't be arsed to remember that the web was supposed to be a universal platform. Clearly the businesses that run such sites don't care provided the user switches to some other browser. If Apple and Google, as browser vendors, get the rough end of this they'll get no sympathy from me.
argued that the telco giant should have known that VMware – like the rest of the enterprise software industry – is moving to subscriptions.
Should have known when? The relevant time would have been before they entered into the contracts. How would they have known that?
a price that is well below market
The "market" is Broadom's own so it's not exactly a market price set by competition is it?
I've long been of the view that when a process is devised and written down the rationale should be written down with it. It not only keeps that corporate knowledge from being lost, it also underlines the need for revising the process when the circumstances on which the rationale is predicated change.
The high level decisions are made by the politicians and we've had a long run of advanced Dunning-Kruger syndrome there. HS2 was, I realised when it was proposed, a solution to today's problem in a few decades time. Detailed regulation, OTOH, quite often comes from someone in the Civil Service or an agency who actually does know about the domain. There are obviously exceptions: I formed the view in about 1967 that the Ministry of Labour as I think it then was ran the forerunners of Job Centres staffed all too often by people who were on the wrong side of the counter and subsequent contact with their DWP successors at a higher level did not inspired a revision.