Re: POTUS
"it may not be long before the US will start alienating itself from almost everyone else"
This already sounds like a message from the past. Surely it's government policy to do just that.
42272 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"The other is, companies that use the software may not want to donate / be associated with the software that they use for free. So their options are not to pay them, or to go via a 3rd party (support agreements) and hope that they actually contribute to the development via commits or contributions."
A few examples:
There are a number of Linux distros for which you can buy support or buy as supported from their maintainers, from Red Hat ans Suse down to Zorin. No problem there.
LibreOffice you can buy commercial support from the project website.
PostgresSQL's main site lists companies from whom you can obtain commercial support. A simple search through their lists includes many who state that they are contributors to the project. Some individual contributors are named.
This does not deny that there are individual developers who are unpaid but this situation now seems to be receiving attention.
It's all far removed from paying for a subscription for support and wondering if that support is going to break you system on the second Tuesday of the month.
The way it works is that you point out to somebody that they said something wrong. If they can accept that, they say "Oh, yeah" and move one. Some can't. Their only response is to downvote all your postings. Those downvotes mean that something you posted hit home because you were right and they were wrong. Cherish your downvotes.
You think so?
Synaptic lists 65,741 packages available of which I have 4,429 installed. The Devuan team may have modified some, but "most" would be beyond them. That includes KDE, various graphics editors including Gimp and Inkscape. There's QGIS there as well I ran apt upgrade to update Firefox only a few minutes ago.
It also includes the current LibreOffice which is not from any repository but the same .deb packages you can download for any distro that uses Debian packaging.
Then there are a few applications downloaded and installed by unpacking tarballs or running other, non-Debian install methods ranging from Seamonkey to the Informix database engine and tools.
There are a few which are compiled from source including Falkon and Pinta. The latter requires DotNet runtime and AFAIK that's not modified for Devuan.
Good try but I call bullshit.
My preference would for data on desk/laptop, sync with server at base. That leaves scope for data on device or a data-less device which will connect securely to the server when away from base according to use case. The latter has the option of being able to connect to alternative servers (unlike ChromeOS) so that if, for instance, the user were to be challenged at a border crossing it could be connected to a server which does not contain all the business's confidential data.
The back end should allow for versioning. Ideally the protocol between should be very selective to allow only the correct formats of data to be handled*. A network that allows executables to be handled as if they were data allows for transmission of malware through the network, particularly onto the server, and, of course, a network which allows files to be overwritten with anything is open to ransomware trashing them.
* I'm influenced partly by years of working with an RDBMS where, although we didn't take advantage of it, it would have been perfectly possible to have the server talk to the network via just the port that was assigned to the server and the server understanding nothing other than its own protocol. The other inspiration is using XML. A server designed to provide versioned storage of XML would be able to reject anything that wasn't well-formed and validated according to the schemas it was meant to handle - such as, say, the flat file versions of the Open Document files.
Not an alternative but an additional step. If the law has been broken prosecute those who did so. Having made examples of a few making it clear that anyone subsequently found in possession of the data will not only be prosecuted under the original offence, they will also be in contempt of court.
Unfortunately it's not likely to happen for the next 4 years.
Punters are sick of being told "99% coverage of UK" when it's clearly not
It's exactly the same as FTTP being pushed when there are still areas with crap FTTC (and very likely some still stuck on ADSL).
The supply side is intent on producing and pushing newer tech while the delivery side is failing to complete roll-out of the previous generation and regulators are failing to hold delivery to the universal provision requirement.
I've said a number of times that the reason politicians don't see problems with backdoored communications is that they don't believe security is possible. They don't believe it because given a technically secure channel for a group of them to use one of them will leak the contents anyway. QED.
If you're using the command line to start a GUI application then a remote desktop client would do the same thing. I tend to use ssh to just run oredenary shell commands on the remotes. Most frequently top to find and kill an errant muthbackend on an ancient Mythbuntu.
How do they "know" you are 12.7% Norse?
It used to be said that particle physics is like hitting a watch with a hammer and gathering up the bits to find out how it worked. This is more like hitting several watches with a hammer and working out which bits came from which watch.
I'm pretty sure the tossers in charge are seeking to get a grip on as much of everything as possible. It's what was the actual government that's losing. I've said a few times here that the US was looking like a failed state. That's now becoming the reality.
Perhaps Canada will offer states the chance to become Canadian provinces.