Re: Really...?
Shit!!! "more!.
42029 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"You don't want to try to build the network capacity to shift a significant amount of London's data processing demands to, say, Dinorwig."
To Dinorwig, certainly not - that's not the purpose of that installation. There would be better options. London exceptionalism is an entirely different can of worms.
"If you want to create redundancy you would need a second substation connected to the same grid."
How about two or three smaller substations, each with its own connection to the grid, each supplying part of the load and emergency generators to cover the outage of one of them? Or separate substations for each terminal?
The fact is unavoidable: this was a single point of failure, just the sort of thing that should have been eliminated in the planning for previous expansions.
We were in a similar situation in the biology dept of a forensic lab. One of the aspects of our statements of evidence was that there was separate stationery for single sheet statement and further statements for first, continuation and final pages of multi-page reports. Easy enough to cope with now when the whole thing could be printed on blank paper but back in the day with a single tray printer and simple text editors it was better to leave it to the typists who, apart from anything else, had a better sense of which to take.
Then there are the ones that reach 100% and then go back to 20%. With a bit of luck they move forward again.
Yes, I'm thinking of Windows updates. That's why I prefer to do Linux updates from the command line - you get an actual commentary of what it's downloading on a file by file basis, what the current download ed amount is and they speed before moving on to what it's unpacking or setting up. You might not know what all those library packages are fore but at least you know progress is being made.
"Ofcom claims the country is on course to have "full-fiber" internet connectivity (i.e. fiber-to-the-premises or FTTP) available to 96 percent of homes and businesses by 2027, if all the planned network deployments are realized."
And the 4% will be those that get crap FTTC and even worse analogue to the exchange. No thought of getting everyone up to a basic standard before adding the shiny.
I think I'd be inclined to start by just throwing the crawler randomly selected words from the files in /usr/share/dict, then pick out clusters of those words and throw them into the steam, also at random. That way the LLM gets lots of meaningless associations of words to chomp on so that instead of hallucinating stuff that looks real it would be hallucinating random lists of words. For added maliciousness sprinkle in about 50% randomly selected words from PR spiels.
Your IT chappie could spend the few quid a year it costs to set up a domain and an email service with somebody like Mythic Beasts* and access them with a genuine email client like Thunderbird, downloading the emails to your own device. (You could leave the emails online but would then eventually have to pay a few quid more a year for for storage. If your IT chappie can't work out how to do that you need a new one.
* Other registrars and MSPs are available.
If everything that comes out of an LLM has to be checked and at least some of it discarded what useful purpose does it serve? People ask questions because they need answers. The LLM only seems to be useful if you already know the answer to check it.
In reality LLMs are going to be put in customer-facing positions where the customer is looking to customer service as the only definitive answer for a problem. When that's done without adding the disclaimer then the customer isn't going to believe they must check elsewhere and, in fact will have nowhere else to check. If the definitive answer comes with a disclaimer where do you go from there?
"As a non-IT engineer, I wish my mistakes didn't have the potential for people dying."
Given that there are plenty nutjobs believing whatever AI tells them it's quite likely that AI will, if it already hasn't, led to deaths. The difference is that the techbros don't care because they're unlikely to be held to responsibility in the way they should.
"tell them to delete it under gdpr, which they are obligated to do"
Easier said than done.
Norway isn't in the EU so the EU regulations don't protect anyone resident in Norway no more than they do in the UK. It may well be that Norway has its own version but then does OpenAI have a legal entity resident in Norway that can be brought to book?
(Yes I know the UK also has its own version which successive govts. seem to want to move out of the way of LLMs and their owners in the interests of putting, as they think, GDP ahead of GDPR.)
"I'm not going to write about Oracle and SAP lock-in."
Just as well in the case of SAP, at least as far as US lock-in is concerned:
"SAP SE ...is a European multinational software company based in Walldorf, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. The company is the world's largest vendor of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAP
but then it needs "a lot" of work to make all the bits work together
Yes, it's a lot of work to download an installation ISO for any desktop Linux distro, copy it to a USB device and then install it on as many PCs as you need. You want some online storage?
Fine, look for any European company offering NextCloud. You want an email provider that's not US? Fine, look for any of the European companies offering that. Wouldn't it be difficult using such a service without Outlook on your computer? No, look at the Thunderbird or other email client that was included on the distro you downloaded.
For all the office stuff, it's already there. You need to do some work to put it together but that's going to be paid off in not chasing whatever migrations commercial suppliers will force on you or cleaning up after yet another Patch Tuesday broke something.
"And addressing that is probably the most important part of any attempt to reduce drug traffic."
But it doesn't have the same appeal as battering somebody's door down at 4 am and, to make matters worse, might be hard work.
There's certainly a need to deal with these vicious gands fighting turf wars but that's essentially symptom treatment.
SAP, like many others, are forcing their customers to make a huge investment in migrating simply to suit themselves, the supplier. Even if the new platform is functionally similar to the old it is a deeply customer-hostile move. I suppose the only way they can get away with it is the possibility that the customers might find the grass even more shrivelled up on the other side.