Re: security , no it's in the way
It's a question of "what happens if we do get hacked"
Make that "when" and ask it of manglement. "If" gives wriggle room.
42540 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2014
"better for the environment"
Looking at the fields behind me - this is the time of year for lambs. If the local farmer wasn't raising sheep and beef cattle (the regulations for milk production made dairying infeasible for a farm that size years ago) what would he do with it? Historically the area produced oats almost exclusively, so much so that fields supporting other crops were given names such as Ryeclose of Wheatcroft. I don't see cereals being a thing. In any case ploughing up grassland is going to release stored carbon over a few years. Without rearranging, or more likely removing, all the walls, ploughing would likely lead to soil erosion. It's a south-facing slope so maybe a vineyard....
It's also worth realising that grazed chalk grassland is one of the UK's most significant environments in terms of both botanical and invertebrate diversity. Ploughing so much of it up to plant crops was an environmental disaster.
Thus for cyber security it is going to need some very high profile business failures and eye watering recovery costs for business leaders (and “investors”) to take matters seriously.
Preferably followed by directors being prosecuted for not discharging their fiduciary duty.
"if you wanted to open a file created by it, you had to be running a copy of the suite yourself."
It was a little more than that: if you wanted to open a file created by the latest version of it in its default format you had to be running buy the current version of the suite yourself irrespective of how many older versions you may have bought.
"a patchwork of network overbuild,"
SWMBO would be very disappointed with any of her class who produced work with som many holes in it. FTTP roll out should either have been held back until there was better coverage of FTTC at reasonable quality or FTTP be required to deal with the existing not-spots first.
We're maybe two or three hundred metres from the cabinet. Although there's a fibre access point available at the corner of the garden we're not interested in anything more. A friend says she's connected to the same cabinet, a connection that must be about a mile of copper. As she's also about a mile closer to the exchange it's odd that she's on a cabinet so far away but there it is.
Just about every telephone post between the cabinet and the exchange has one of those fibre connection boxes on it but, of course there are none where she lives. Meanwhile there seems to be some contractor activity looking at the ducts which pass our house which I suspect to some altnet looking at duplicating what's already here.
"The Metaverse is roadkill under the AI bandwagon."
AI, of course, is destined to be roadkill under the next bandwagon that comes along. Possibly quantum something but who knows?
I'm amazed that manglements seem to to have realise that the really life-changing technologies often arrive without great hoo-hah and often with comparatively investment needed so they still chase after the bandwagons, blithely scattering huge wodges of cash as they go.
Maybe none of that exists. After all if it did surely Smith's post would explain how they deal with is - and with the CLOUD Act.* So if he doesn't mention it it must all have gone away. We can trust him with things like that, can't we?
* He welcomed that when it was passed. Not because it enabled them to look after user interests but because it gave them clarity about not doing so.
It hasn't been legally safe to use such services for personal data since GDPR, even worse since the CLOUD Act but maintaining trade with the US meant that it suited the arm of the EU that handled that sort of thing to pretend it was and keep inventing privacy fig-leaves even as each one was torn off in court actions. Now that pretence is no longer needed.
As these things come under closer scrutiny in the EU HMG is going to have to be careful not to lose equivalence or the UK's interests could also be impacted.
"It shows that they really don't understand their business at all."
Even to a non-coffee drinker such as myself this is the obvious conclusion.
It's one that is all too common:
- What's the nature of your business?
- We sell ProductX
In many cases that's wrong. The business provides a service which sells ProductX. The services is provided by people, not AI or some automated machine. Even if AI or some automated machine provides ProductX the service is provided by people.
"If the script is over 50 lines long it should have been written in a proper high level language."
There used to be a mantra which ran something like:
Never do in C what you could do in ark
Never do in akw what you could do in sed
Never do in sed what you could do in tr
Never do in tr what you could do in shell
"Autres temps, autres mœurs"
"If you need a long flow of slides behind you to say what you are meant to be telling the audience, you aren't telling the audience properly."
That's bad. OTOH you might have a long flow of slides which you explain to the audience - actual photographic slides, not text. I used to have a carousel of slides illustrating all sorts of things - altered documents, comparison microscopy, footprints etc. I could pick that up, collect a projector and give different talks depending on the audience, anything from schools to detective training.
PowerPoint and Impress certainly make it too easy to put the text of the talk on the screen; what's on the screen should really be something to talk about.
It depends on what's meant by that. Individual LibreOffice applications are calls to a common executable with a flag to tell it whis functionality the user wanted. He might simply be catching up with that but it would likely be a complete rewrite. Something for Office users to look forward to.
I'd read it as saying that platforms have at most a year to implement it but nothing to say it can't be done in less than that. So if Trump is so keen Truth Social should be up and running with it PDQ. And maybe X so as to oblige his wishes. So they should be open for takedown requests Real Soon Now.