Re: Every last Chinese
What a Carry On!
35 posts • joined 14 Jun 2014
Its probarbly busy before you even start to use it.
If you haven't already done it try looking for guides on improving W10 performance. I used to do things like removing animations, uninstalling (If they'll let you) unnecesary programs and features, stopping non essential services. Run through the system settings (takes a while) and knock off anything you don't need there. If your AV is not MS defender uninstall it to see if that makes a difference and just use defender. Make it a sort of lean, mean games machine but benefits general performance too. Have to admit it worked better on W7 than W10.
Its nice to see so many positive comments in support of W10 and I'd guess that youth and enthusiasm is partly responsible for these.
Like others I've worked with most flavours of MS OS and while there have been some good ones, there have also been some absolute dogs, I'm thinking in particular of W95, ME, Vista and W8. The ones that caused the least problems started off ropey but got fixed eventually through the application of service packs.
I'm retired as an IT person now and no longer have to worry about keeping a business operating in a Windows environment.
What I see as a user in a corporate environment is that W10 does indeed need to be constantly updating and rebooting and it takes forever to wait around for it to finish. I'll turn up early to check that everything is working Tickety-boo, after W10 has finished scratching its bum, belched and farted, whenever I work in a classroom. Off course it may be a symptom of how the network is run, I'm not in a position to tell. I know that my previous employers would have gone ballistic if their systems worked in this way and I am in awe and wonder at the acceptence of this level of performance. Does the functionality of W10 add to business costs?
I have a couple of W10 laptops, SSD and max ram, but I seldom use them anymore. The reason for that is the constant wait for updates and reboots before I can get to use my kit. The new normal of accepting that telemetry is 'ok' is not the philosophy that my old Network Admin taught me and its a difficult habit to break. The uncertain outcome of a long update makes my teeth grind.
I now mostly game on my home setup so when W7 went EOL I switched to Manjaro. I'm comfortable that its a plain user interface between me a my computer and that I'm in charge of my system, nothing is added or taken away without my say so. My better half uses Mint for accounts, marketing, social media, but mostly works on her iPad preferring the flexibility of being able to work anywhere on the move.
We're not an MS household anymore, we don't need to be and W10 is a bit of a dog. There is too much going on and like some older Windows versions it seems not to be fit for purpose. I wonder where they can go from here?
I don't use Outlook or the associated software (Whats it called these days? Office 365?) but I suspect that businesses buy into it because its seemingly good value for money with little outlay on on-prem equipment or staff and can be used from anywhere. If something goes wrong or needs attending then its a call to MS support. Brilliant for the small businessman I would guess.
I do sync with a Nextcloud homeserver for calendaring and use one of the many small email providers that provides reliable email. My simple system gives me access to email and calendaring over many devices for the whole household but it may not be suitable for the average Joe who just wants stuff to work, which I understand is generally the case with the MS and Google cloudy thing. I had to set it up and maintain my systems.
I get the frustration with the failure to fix glitches, but you have to report them to the developers before they can be actioned/ ignored. I wouldn't buy into the MS or Google packages, not my cup of tea but YMMV.
HpCompaq nx6310 dual core Intel thingy with inplace upgrade from XP to W7 to W10 (When it was free).
Initially it was an experiment to see how long W10 would last before MS stopped their support on it and its still ongoing. Since then I've added memory and SSD. Its now stored unused in a cupboard for when I need to know what W10 looks like. If I bring it out and switch it on I usually have to wait for hours of updates to complete before I can use the machine confidently again. Spins up quite well after the updates have installed and its rebooted. Not bad performance for 2006 except the video is a bit glitchy and the wireless adaptor sometimes needs a kick to connect, but that could just be ancient hardware related.
I had a chinese generic tablet with the same W10 upgrade from W8.0 but that died when windows refused to install the upgrades because of lack of disk space . . . W10 failed for that bit of kit.
Selective quotes :)
"I have used Microsoft products from DOS 1 to Windows 7, "
"I just know I was quite happy with Microsoft for decades, "
I really, really tried W10 et al . . . but there was no love and I ended up dumping Windows. I've worked and trained in the MS ecosystem for years and seen most of its incarnations, perhaps not DOS 1, but I was there for DOS 4 and Windows 3.13.
I seem to remember that DR-DOS 5 or 6 came out with a better memory manager and disk compression, vital for some games (Wing Commander!) and to increase disk space on my 40Mb home drive. MS responded with similar improvements in MSDOS 6. An upgrade was given away free on computer magazines (Remember them?) which sort of canned DRDOS for me. MS did the dirty on them and I was more fickle then.
As of last christmas I've been a happy Non MS and Non Apple user and it feels comfortable. The main issues I get is when I meddle with things that don't concern me and I have to restore the system which takes < 15m. Otherwise, bloody snappy and responsive.
Edit for repetition and I don't work now.
Yes, its weird, isn't it? Keynesian economics all of a sudden after monetarism and whatnot, not to leave out this last period of audacity, sorry, austerity.
In this current crisis it now seems <to me> a bad idea to have reduced public services to the bone.
I wondered whether we would see a return to the liberalism and socialism experienced after the last war.
I cannot cycle because a bit of a heart prob makes me breathless after a few short turns of the pedal. Where I live the bus stop is a 2.5 mile hike away. If the bus runs it does go to the nearest railway station 12 miles away.
I own a diesel car which I use to get to town for food shopping as the fast dwindling shops there still provide better value than some of the supermarkets. I don't earn a living anymore, so very low fixed income. When the car goes, or is forced to go, to car heaven, that will be it for me. No public transport means I'm stuck because I'll never be able to afford a new car, EV or otherwise.
I volunteer my car to drive people who are now, at this time, in exactly that position, low income, no transport or too infirm. Mostly I drive people to attend appointments at a hospital 30 miles away, sometimes for a 10 minute appointment. Without a cheap, integrated and comprehensive transport policy, they have to rely on people like me and have no other way of getting there comfortably and efficiently otherwise. I get the mileage (£25) and wait for them and may have to look after them. A taxi costs £100 and they get dropped of at the main entrance.
The cost to the patient is due to NHS centralisation, closing local NHS services. We should seriously have a think about moving essential services like shops and hospitals closer to where they are needed and think about how to provide transport across the whole country linking localities. We should drop the current financial focus on cities and finance from the ground up rather than wait for money to trickle down from the top.
I read someones comments about Norway earlier. They have Hydro electricity, a brilliant transport system, loads of cash (saved from N.Sea oil) and a great attitude towards the future problems we all will face. At least as I understand it, they are much better equipped for change to a low carbon economy than we here in the UK are.
... that bit about methane at the beginnning of the thread. It occurred to me that there are now nearly 8 billion people on earth. How much methane do we produce, compared to cows, horses and wotnot? Especially if our diet becomes more plant based. Just curious.
My skill set is a mixture of company training and self attainment. I benefited from both and I hope the companies I worked for did too. I imagine that it is rare for someone to have the exact same skills needed to push a business forward, so some training would be required, although I've seen people required to take on roles that they were not competent at without training. The last company I worked for recruited web developers from within the business. They were trained and had to show a level of competence before being allowed to work in their new role.
I have learned to be very concerned when I'm told something is treated or done lawfully. It invariably means that they have a loophole and that they think they have permission to do what they like, without the inconvenience of morality or whether its appropriate. The law is a double edged sword.
I tend to agree with this in principle. People I know in London don't have a car because of good public transport and restictions on the motor vehicle. In Brum the transport system is rubbish but a subcription service to Amazon or whoever, "Alexa take me to the Bull Ring" seems viable to me. If the big tech companies provide these vehicles on demand you could just hire one at will. I imagine it would bring all sorts of problems if it took off like, who pays the road tax if no-one owns cars? who is responsible for the insurance? How do we stop someone like Amazon monopolising the transport system and make them pay their taxes? What do we do with all those drives laid to concrete on our front lawn? Will we still have a street parking problem? If people cannot get a driving job, what else will they do? How do we avoid the AV that was used in last nights home from the pub run? I'm pretty certain that AI and all that stuff is not designed to be useful to anyone but a few profitable organisations in the long run. I still wonder who it will serve when everything is entirely AI and no-one is earning any money for lack of job prospects. Universal credit isn't doing so well.
. . . but I'm pretty sure that my driving instructor advised me to slow down in anticipation of the lights changing, demonstrating control of my vehicle and awareness of my surroundings. I don't remember being told to accelerate across traffic lights. That was a long while ago however, so times may have changed.
I got one of these letters and I live in Northamptonshire! Is it just Warwickshire and Coventry that's doing this I wondered? Can't say I'm entirely convinced that they know how to look after my personal data or that they won't make claim to it and use it for commercial purposes. The whole thing read like a marketing interns effort at fluffy platitudes to pull the wool over the eyes of the proles. I just made sure my GP understands that I control my records. They sent me an option out form. The rules should be that you're out untill you opt in, but then a lot of these harebrained schemes woudl'nt work, would they?
I'm at that age where I am unemployed but have to work another 5 years before I collect a pension, if there is one. Ageism exists, at least where I live, but one gets by.
At the rate things are going, see latest Conservative manifesto, I would not be surprised if the solution they come up with works like this:
1) Raise retirement age to 150 years, therefore no pensions pay out until genetics catches up, which will be for well off people anyway.
2) Put old people into workhouses /privatised care homes.
3) Old people contracted to work in workhouses /privatised care homes, producing goods for tokens.
4) Tokens pay for health care and basic living necessities, like food, clothes, rent, prescriptions etc. I seem to remember someone saying prisons work like this.
5) Any excess wealth accrued over lifetime pays for health care and basic living necessities.
6) When money runs out, implement euthanasia clause in contract to prevent them becoming a burden on society
7) When too frail to work, implement euthanasia clause in contract to prevent them becoming a burden on society.
8) Sell body parts for recycling (Soylent green was people, you know) and collect whatever is left of lifetime wealth.
9) Have a great slogan outside each institution saying something like "Work sets you free"
This way old people will be able to make a contribution into their old age without being a burden on the rest of society. The will pay their own way and the demand on the NHS will be reduced. Win, Win.
I've been toying with various Linux distro's for years but never really settled on any one in particular.
Recently my elderly neighbour wanted a computer just to surf the internets, pick up webmail and do a bit of buying and selling online. I enabled them by giving them an old Dell box with Zorin OS and a single icon on the desktop for Firefox.
I've recently installed Linux Mint (Mate) for a business user who did not want the expense of a W10 upgrade after a hardware refresh. They previously used W7 and Office 2013 with Outlook installed locally. They can scan and print to Canon and Brother devices, also connect to a NAS for file sharing using Mint. A lot of their work is internet based and as a Firefox user in Windows there was no transition training needed to allow them to access their various web apps when using Firefox for Linux.
They are a wary of Libre Office ( They don't want a learning curve) and feel more comfortable with MS Office apps, especially Excel which they use a lot and can access through their Office Live account. There was no need to install Office locally and they can connect to their remotely stored documents from any location with various devices if required.
Mint has been installed three weeks now without a problem and the user tells me they are working just as well, if not a bit faster. When they have reported issues its been to provide a missing facility which they had used previously within windows, like scanning to a Brother printer. I have not had any problems (so far) in being able to provide for their requests.
I've given someone a working option to their Windows installation at a reduced cost. I am by no stretch of the imagination a whizz at his sort of thing, so I'm doubly pleased.
I've got a Nextcloud calendar linked through my NAS updating three LAN based devices, PC, tablet and phone, Thunderbird calendar on the PC works really well. As an email client its a brilliant alternative to Outlook for my purposes.
Hopefully the project will continue successfully, I'm planning to move my domains completely away from a web based email client and thunderbird seems to be the only contender so far. Really dislike web interfaces and I'm not so sure about web technology and how that would be used as an mail client interface. Would security be an issue?
Support the idea of bringing it into Open or Libre Office, I think mail client integration would be a useful facility.
Nope, not at all. It ruins immersion. Its the same with TV, so I avoid ad channels if I watch anything at all.
Why would I fight through several layers of ads to get to content? Similarly with TV, why would I get hooked on a drama just to have the immersion spoiled by some needless snack advert that has nothing to do with the item I'm watching? I exercise choice and leave it out.
Restricted by blocking ads? Not really. I can't read the whole internets in a life time and there is plenty content to see elsewhere so I don't find its that restricting.
The upside of blocking is the total lack of malware alerts.
PS - I have tried to run a browser without ad blocking, its a waste of life, pointless if you want to do anything useful.
For the last two weekends running both XM655 could be seen an the ground with the XH558 flying over head! brilliant! and a once in a lifetime experience I fear.
We have often had flypasts from not only XH558 but also other wartime aircraft, Now andd again I've seen old bi-planes, a Hurricane, Spitfire, Mustang and a Lancaster, Wellesbourne Airfield where the XM655 stands used to be used an old training airfield for Canadian bomber crews.
Yes. I cannot imagine that a marketing department from any organisation would be accurate factual or truthful. Gotta work it out for yourself if you can find a way through the obfuscation.
It would be a shocker if one or the other actually agreed with the competitions findings as a result of the application of scientific methodology. "We tested the claims and we have failed to find a flaw in the data, they are correct and we cant beat that"
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020