Re: In the British Army,
Agreed, but I'd actually want this, tape reel and all:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtXtIivRRKQ
161 publicly visible posts • joined 30 May 2014
Way to miss the point chap. Again, hidden cameras will not stop dickheads from racing down roads. They'll get caught and clobbered (how they are clobbered is mute - fine, ban, points, whatever). But, as is quite evident, there's an endless stream of idiots all too happy to follow them. So, my point: how do hidden cameras help deter dangerous driving and/or speeding? They don't. They're crap, immoral and echo the model of policing that was used before a certain Mr Peeler came along.
By following the "convictions (or arrests) = success" model, you aren't reducing or eliminating speeding, just convicting and fining.
Speed cameras and their positioning are rightly criticised in the UK. And for good reason. They are hardly ever used as an obvious, visible deterrent but instead hidden behind signs, inside innocuous objects and generally used as traps to punish the foolish, the confused and the inattentive who didn't spot the single sign indicating the speed change and all round generally generate plenty of revenue.
First I'll say that I'm not condoning speeding. However, I will ask some of those sanctimonious posters above whether this or this is actually in the spirit of police principles? How are those acting to prevent speeding? What do they do to reduce idiots blasting through a posted 30mph village at 50? Sure, you may catch the idiot, clobber him with a fine and points (good for the coffers and stats) but he'll still have speeded. Or do North Wales police think that convictions are a more successful measure of their policing instead of a reduction in the amount of speeders?
When they've got the Canadian bits sorted, any chance you could hand it round some other research institutions around the world to implement locally? Won't stop your data being stuck on a database in your own country, but will reduce the likely hood of another country keeping a copy.
Gimp mask, well, because that's how it'll feels to have your data harvested and put on the UK's new big brother database.
As that old saying goes: Slowly slowly catchy monkey
In this case scum have managed to build a true big brother database (I suggest the term database be used in any talk on this bill and is said loudly and often) and are slowly revealing little bits to clueless MP's until its too late:
"And this bit here holds the phone call records. To, err, see if Terrorists (Terrorists! yes that's brilliant) make phonecalls"
...a year later...
"And this bit keeps the travel records, so we can see where the terrorists are flying from and to"
Ad nauseam
Allow me to paint a picture: Imagine if you would that when the complaint went to politician x, it was delivered over dinner in a very fine restaurant and, when said politician visited the bogs, he found quite a large over-stuffed brown envelope.
At least, that's how I pictured it, but I am brutally cynical about politicians in general...
Incompetence? Perhaps. Deliberate test? Maybe. "Oops, we're sorry" statement? Meaningless corporate PR.
Whatever the reason, the fact that the Snoopware exists at all is galling. It shouldn't even exist in the first place to be enabled and for that Microsoft should be continually clobbered in the only way they understand - the wallet.
And, before anyone responds with the ridiculous "But so-and-so tracks you via x" or a variation of, they're scum as well and that statement shouldn't distract from the bile and clobbering that MS rightly gets for this.
When my little person gets a little older, I'll be implementing some sort of block and time control. It is inevitable that they'll want to go online. However, the block will be one chosen and controlled by me, not some government apparatchik. They'll also be educated and supervised from as soon as I can get them to listen. My personal view is that the wider Internet is akin to the pub - an adults playground and Children should be accompanied and supervised at all times.
"The report additionally alleged that the People's Republic discriminates against foreign investors, and has "abusive legal or administrative processes" that particularly favour "indigenous companies over US firms" while "refusing to protect the intellectual property of US companies from piracy and counterfeiting". It encouraged Congress to have a nosey into whether such practices chime with the nation's World Trade Organisation commitments."
Perhaps veering towards hyperbole a little, but this smacks of rank hypocrisy!
They don't like it up 'em!
No matter which way you look at it, this gets us to 80-90% government surveillance. The government will be able to search databases and know of your phones location, who your friends and acquaintances are, who you talk to and message on a regular basis (and in some cases the contents of those messages), what you've bought/sold, where you work, your salary, holiday destination, motor vehicle trips, elements of public transport journeys, communications you've made and your personal interests.
The only reason they can't do 100% (yet) is there's no widespread facial recognition being used, bank notes aren't tracked and nor are bicycles displaying ID's. Oh, and covering your face from CCTV isn't an offence. Yet.
:'(
What a colossal mess. The Internet Community should hang its head in shame. Congratulations chaps, you've not only sunk your own attempt to reform ICANN, that had tacit support from nearly all quarters, but you did it while metaphorically blowing your own feet off at the same time. Only after both feet had gone did you realise that you needed them to walk...
Cretins. A certain Chris Grayling's recent speech should give you enough information:
“The Freedom of Information Act is something this government is committed to but we want to make sure it works well and fairly. It cannot be abused. It cannot be misused. It is on occasions misused by those who use it effectively as a research tool to generate stories for the media. That isn’t acceptable.”
Err, that's the whole point of the act you incompetent fool - to help keep the government to account. Me thinks that someone wants to keep their expenses secret. Roll on the next leak of MP's troughing. It shouldn't be too long now until the next cash for x sting or leaked info on MP's claiming £15 for their poppy expenses.
1 - New report recommending judicial oversight
2 - GCHQ cretins lean on 'soft' Gov ministers to ignore recommendations for fear of Judiciary
3 - Gov ministers play into their hands (nice spending habits you have, shame if it became public)
4 - Report successfully ignored
5 - Immoral dataslurp and snooping continues!
Plus ça Change...
"Gould argued that the volume of these attacks would be a reality check for the encryption debate and lead to a demand for better protection online."
I agree. The end goal should be making sure that all data stored is properly encrypted and secured and all devices are secured and hardened so they are able to resist malicious attacks. And by malicious attacks, I include both criminals and unwanted government intrusion. Want the information? Get evidence and a warrant. Don't fucking think it is acceptable to go fishing whenever you feel like it.
Snoopers charter is absolutely right. In this instance, government snooping without good cause or evidence.
Rumpus has been a favourite of mine. As in causing a rumpus, or scene.
I applaud this article and champion the full use of the English language lexicon. Too often, I am ridiculed for usage of fine, if little used, word even though the usage is correct. What is so wrong in using our beautiful language to its full extent.
Though, privately, I would love to see the return of the Aesc; æ. For use in words such as Dæmons, Archæology, Mediæval, fæces and so on.
Now's a good time to be a Datacentre specialist in the EU. Me thinks there'll be a small, but significant increase in demand for new ones ...
... unless a certain USian court case goes a certain way, then the fireworks really will begin!
Anyway, anyone fancy some popcorn? This'll be a good one to watch
I'll shed a tear and raise a pint to BB10. Love my Z10 and intent to keep it until it falls apart or becomes unusable. And then, I'll be looking for replacements. Such a lovely UI and its jarring to go back to iOS and the Android UI is an abomination. Finally, I refuse to go over to fucking Android.
So much for consumer choice "You can have all these models with same UI and the same data slurping software"...
I drink AMPAS tears. The most delicious part of this is the realisation that seems to come across AMPAS: "But, we are really important, the centre of all, the special snowflake! We can't conceive of anything outside of our little sphere. How dare these upstarts exist and, and, they've successfully defied us!" Queue temper tantrums...
Harmen earlier today: "What?! They're coming back and voting for people we only approved to "broaden the debate" but didn't want to actually win? Quick, get 'em shifted lads persons!