Re: transparency unlike unworkable limits is way to go
" Corporations that invest in elections should be ready for the consequences if they support a candidate that their customers don't appreciate." -- Hah nice try, but everyone knows this is not how it works, it is a small vocal and often times violent minority that always show up (i.e. the radical left)
"Please tell me where this rampant voter fraud is? Yes, that's right: "Redistricting". --- please tell me any other civilized country that doesn't require proof of ID to vote, the USA is a joke in this respect and there have been numerous cases of voter fraud caught over the years from dead people to illegals, to people voting multiple times. Besides how can you even prove the majority of voter fraud cases when you can't ask for ID.
All that aside voter ID laws did nothing to reduce minority turn out, its just another fact less whine by Democrats who like their voter fraud.
http://www.worldtribune.com/voter-id-and-voter-fraud-available-data-contradicts-the-democrat-narrative/
The only one with zero credibility seems to be you who can't back up your claims of this mythical 'zero vote fraud' when it has been clearly documented over and over every election cycle. Just an example from the article:
“More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples [from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study] indicated that they were registered to vote,” the authors found. “Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.” -- yes no voter fraud at all...