Re: Why not store some data offline?
Of course it does! It needs to be tokenised and stored as an NFT on a private blockchain. That's the future.
77 posts • joined 26 Mar 2014
There's a reason there are no definitive references re: can't take past performance into account. It's bollocks
Here's the Government policy on how its done
DEFRA don't know what they are doing
GDS really don't know what they are doing
GDS are ideologues, who put rate their mantras more highly than risk control
GDS use 'spend controls' to bully departments
GDS abdicate responsibility by never actually saying what they will do
Liam Maxwell failed hideously
Costs went up
Risks went up
Yet we definitely need to fund them for another £450m because they save money.
And we need to adopt Government as a Platform because its a good idea (by a book publisher)
But it's OK. Because you've got a Macbook. And insecure Google Mail.
Public sector IT, you are about to be even more fucked than ever before.
Re: MOJ's move under the £1.2bn FITS deal to disaggregate its IT outsourcing contract is also going badly
That means GDS can point to this and force them to split up into even small chucks and really fuck it up. And CCS can 'help' with the complex transactions team too! Result!
YAY! GO GDS! YAY! GO CCS! YAY! GO MOJ!
I'm with CCS here on this.
One of the premises behind G-Cloud is regular recompetition. If you can just extend and expand ad infinitum, you're not driving any market or value.
The problem though is what it is touted as being. From a supplier's perspective, its a licence to sell in any way you like. But it's not that at all. It's a licence for the buyer to buy the defined services. Making it clear the terms of that licence is probably appropriate.
Not as good as Crown Commercial Service savings though.
My favourite of theirs....
"As digital services are generally a new service with no previous spend to compare against the benefit methodology is to take an average of all bids under the tender and compare to the winning bid."
Irrespective of market rates or proper benchmarking, we add 'em up, divide it and take away. Savings guaranteed!
How many more times are El Reg going to publish this nonsense where apples and oranges are compared?
For a start, the police are covered by the Microsoft/CCS MOU so there is only one price for all of that. And then what will change is how they are buying it to suit local needs and when. Some might be 'getting their Microsoft free;. When they are on 'holiday' and sweating a perpetual asset.
"He said one of the "low hanging fruits" for IT savings would include plans to start consolidating licensing contracts, mainly with Oracle and Microsoft"
So now you get an NHS CfH 'Enterprise Licence' which you have to renew in full every few years because someone always wants something.
Total goes up, not down.
It can't be put through a CCS framework. CCS is an instrument of the Government. Parliament must be independent of Government. Hence Parliament has its own procurement function and can't touch any of the frameworks of CCS or any other public body for that matter.
"However, the system is not officially fully live – under the GDS “digital by default service standard”, the system is still in beta test phase" according to Computer Weekly
What the f**k? You're telling me that the system running the payments to farmers is actually hasn't come out of test???
The question is how agile was it? Very, apparently. So agile you can do it on paper.
YAY! GO GDS!
More seriously, when will someone stop all of this nonsense? This stuff actually matters. It's not lastminute.com trying a new feature on a website. It's just not the same.
And this multi-supplier stuff is dreadful to manage commercially. Who is actually now responsible for this failure? I suspect no-one can actually be sued.
So any chance we can take the real lessons stop this crap before we do the same to HMRC and destroy our nation's ability to collect tax?
Complete disaggregation, 'Government as a Platform' and in-house 'apps' built by GDS or the local 'Digital' team.
Now let's be fair. Apart from the 'Government as a Platform' buzzword bingo (which seems to me to be just some re-usable apps for common tasks (which there's probably commercial software for already)), that;s how things used to be done. But it relies on....
1) In-house capacity and capability to run IT
2) High level procurement skills
3) High level contract management skills
Good luck with that.
I'm not exactly a fan of GDS but this is even more twaddle than they could produce (except the discussion on how to pronounce GOV.uk). It seems to me this is two blokes who 'built' G-Cloud (whatever built means in terms of delivering not very much but a dodgy framework agreement and an unrealistic 'cloud-first' policy) not liking their dubious legacy being eroded. Oh dear. How sad. Never mind.
YAY! GO GDS! YAY! GO SELF-SERVING TWONKS!
You're confusing the technology licensing with the EBS licensing. The tech will either be by processor or by NUP. I suspect the former but I don't know.
There's then another set of licences to use the ERP. That's what's being paid by use and will be pennies per 'licence'. It was, at one point, the standard way of licensing purchase orders and expense management as it kept it simple.
El Reg and others (including HMG themselves who produced the chart in here http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2011/11/oracle-has-70-per-cent-of-soft.html) have done this article before and made the same mistake of conflating two very different licences and adding them up to give a single number. It's completely erroneous to do that conflation. Apples =/= pears.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022