Posts by rnturn 262 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Mar 2014
Saw this story this morning:
https://www.businessinsider.com/middle-manager-hiring-white-collar-recession-layoffs-jobs-efficiency-2024-12
When those middle managers are booted out of the company, who's the AI going to call? Someone in the C suites? That ought to be entertaining.
I once worked for a project manager whose idea of documentation was a two-page (max) description of the software being used. IMHO, that was barely enough to list all the software components/languages being used and, maybe, a terse description of what it was used for. But two pages was his limit.
I've found the current Gnome desktop annoying. Seems to want to be different just because. I endured it at my last client because the "official" download site on their LAN didn't include any desktop other than Gnome for our Linux VMs.
I really like the KDE Activities feature (earlier versions of it were "meh" at best). Having customized menus for different activities has turned out to be very useful. As is the ability to, once again, assign different background to each activity after losing that with KDE's virtual desktops.
To each his own, I guess.
> 2. Can't do a proper formatted signature without mucking around with creating it in a new mail, saving it as HTML and making sure it stays where you put it, along with all its HTML elements. This is 2023, not 1993!
Holy moley! What elaborate HTML needs to go into a .sig that can't be done in a couple of minutes in vi?
> A good UI would confine inbox use to unread message Opening a message would remove it from the inbox.
Hmm... All of my email stays in the Inbox until I've decided what to do with it. Just because I've read it doesn't mean I've finished dealing with it. Hiding emails from me just because I've touched it doesn't qualify as a good interface to me.
I'm glad the article mentioned LG. They made a damned fine cellphone but decided that after 1-2 security updates, users weren't going to get any more. When I finally replaced my last LG, it had been over three years since the last updates. I suppose the security-aware cellphone user would simply dump the phone for a newer mode. And LG's response seems to have been "Too much trouble to provide updates. We're leaving the market." I'll be thinking twice before buying another smart-anything from LG.
> If not, then that's one thing it has going for it. ... But just the one.
Heh. I still recall some older UNIX books having chapters or appendices devoted to the way certain aspects of the OS worked under AIX. Haven't touched the OS since the last employer that was running an RS/6000 and don't miss either at all.
> it may well be cheaper and more 'planet friendly' to drive twenty minutes to work and let your employer provide the heating and lighting
But for those of us whose commute can amount to well over an hour each way on most days, I'll eat a little extra heating and lighting (well not so much of that as my home office has Southern exposure) costs rather than spending upwards of two hours of each day behind the wheel in bumper-to-bumper traffic trying keep away from the dunderheads who find it necessary to drive 10-15MPH over the posted limit weaving in and out of traffic.
I had an Ultra 60 that I wound up getting rid of. Interesting to keep up-to-date on Solaris as we were transitioning to Sol10 at work but, to prepare for an upcoming move, it went out the door. It was a real power hog, too. I swear I could tell by looking at the spinning disk in the power meter on the back of the house that the Ultra 60 was powered up.
> I had a roommate in college that kept a PDP-11/34 running, complete with a couple of RL-02 drives. He spent more time chasing up broken point-to-point wiring in the backplane than he did being logged in.
I worked with PDPs for a number of years and never once has backplane wiring problems. (Even made a change to the backplane wiring to support a static RAM card for an 11/70---no problems.) I have to wonder what the heck he might have been doing to create those.
> Anyway, I'm not familiar with the area where they are located but I understand the rents are prohibitive and I don't know how much of a misery commutes might be.
I used to have to spend time out at Moffett Field back in the '80s. Even back then the commute from our hotel in San Jose (anything closer would blow our daily stipend) could be 45 minutes or more in bumper-to-bumper traffic. I can't imagine those commutes have gotten any better though there always BART that some can take advantage of. I felt really bad for the FTEs who were commuting from Stockton (or farther) where they'd found affordable housing.
In some manger's office the reaction was "Ooh! Shiny! Put that into production right away!" without asking any questions about whether the site was HIPPA-compliant.
I had software vendors issue upgrades/updates/patches back in the '90s that blew our HIPPA policies out of the water which, then, had to be re-implemented. It appears the idjits STILL haven't learned.
It's not just OS security that's the problem. Years ago, I wound up discovering that the consultant that installed and did the initial setup of an enterprise batch processing system set it up so that all jobs ran as the application superuser. Apparently this "expert" had failed to read the fine manual about how to control access to batch jobs. The way it had been set up made it possible for anyone who logged in -- say, to restart a failed reporting job in the middle of the night -- to accidentally kick off a job that should only have been run by the DBAs. The fix was fairly simple and could have been implemented during the next scheduled downtime but was put on the back burner---indefinitely. One of those things that makes you go home and update one's resume.
Despite having access to a slew of web browsers on Linux, I can remember one web site that only worked with Konqueror for the longest time (I think it worked with IE well enough). But it's been years since that was the case; AFAIK, the site is now inaccessible to Linux users. I don't even bother trying nowadays.
> ... it's not a bug, it's an undocumented requirement...
We got one of those years ago after a hospital management software package "upgrade" that changed the password lifetime for every user account to 9999 days. After going through the two-inch thick pile of paper that was the release notes, I found that this change was never mentioned. A call to the vendor went something like "Why would you do that?" to which they responded "Oh... You've instituted an N-day lifetime to comply with HIPAA?" It turns out that they made that password lifetime change at the request of a *single* customer. That it was potentially rolled out to ALL customers lowered my already low opinion of the vendor. And I was left wondering if any other customers had noticed that their user accounts had been mucked with as part of an application upgrade.
So... as another user posted about "kids releasing any old crap" nowadays... hey, it's been going on for years and years.
> Send me a flyer through the post office, if it looks interesting I'll read it but email spam is already loathed, and you don't want a pissed off person whose vote you want to get reading your message.
Physical flyers cost money to print and send, even at the reduced rates they might receive. I'm positive that's why they pushed to be able to abuse Gmail.
> On the other hand, I am really looking forward to the backlash against gmail when the prime bullshit hits the fan.
Republican politicians will likely not care about the backlash and would surely complain mightily if their ability to get in voters faces/email accounts is disrupted in any way.
> I’d never give my email address to a political party of any description. I use my own domain name for email. I give companies a unique address and if I get an unsolicited email to that address I know who it’s come from .
Gotta try giving politicians phony usernames as part of my email address. Postfix will simply drop their spam on the floor. I've tried going the unsubscribe route but it not 100% effective. (I could register a complaint somewhere about that but that takes time I'd rather use for something else.)
> If you want to forward on the spam, it's the FEC you want. The FCC would just be confused.
Well, the FCC covers communications (including the Internet) so forwarding it to them might have an affect. If nothing else it might cause them to contact the FEC and asking "What the hell were you thinking?"
> Early 80s, John and Stan did a demonstration of speech recognition at work...
A fellow undergraduate EE student used a low-cost speech recognition board to make a voice controlled waveform generator. It wasn't terribly sophisticated device but it was able to switch between sine, triangle, and square waves, adjust amplitude and frequency, etc. by voice command. While it was light years behind what Siri is able to do today he did this using an Altair in '77/'78.
> A return to work mandate would be impossible without relocating most of the team.
Like that'll ever happen. Recall IBM's move that closed a lot of regional offices and mandated people move to certain cities in order to keep their jobs. Did any of them get moved on the IBM's dime?
And with the two-earner family being the norm nowadays, it's the height of arrogance for a company to tell an employee that their spouse has kill the career path they were on and go job hunting in a new city.
I still have LPs -- well over 1000 -- that I still play, including original release Beatles LPs that still sound great. Like I mentioned: proper record handling (learned from my Dad when I was a kid). I have even more CDs. Some of the them are re-releases of LPs that I have and some of them sound awful compared to the original LP. It's got nothing to do with analog vs. digital. It's the remixing that ruined the CD. Most peoples' complaints about LPs are about things that are due to their own lack of care. Those folks are better off with 128Kbps MP3s.
Do you lose information? Yes. Is it information you can hear? Probably not. Our ears are low pass filters and most anything above 20KHz can't be heard... when we're young. As we age, most of us are lucky to be able to hear the frequencies in the upper teens. Doesn't matter if the source is analog or digital-to-analog.
Now the difference between MP3 and FLAC? Even my older ears can tell the difference in an A-B test. Unless that test takes place in a car hurtling down the highway with the windows down.
> Why do all of the audiophiles agree that the vinyl sound is better? Perhaps it does but it's just a digital signal that has had some strange processing steps (not magic) added to it during the process of converting it back to sound.
Early CDs suffered from some recording techniques (miking, etc.) that made them sound pretty harsh (too /much/ high frequency content from what I've heard). Sound engineers learned their way around that problem. I was a fairly early adopter of CDs but never considered them to sound bad. The dynamic range was a joy and something that was rather rare from an LP w/o surface noise becoming distracting. Then record companies decided to compress the hell out of everything to make it sound louder. Maybe THAT's what the LP aficionados appreciate about their LPs: no compression.
You mean purposely recorded with a "lowered" low frequency response. Without that, bass notes would require much wider grooves and eat up too much of the record. (Some say it would cause the stylus to leap out of the groove; dunno about that.) The pre-amp boosts it back to the correct level. That surprises some of the vinyl newbies when they plug that used turntable they found in a resale shop into their AV receiver that doesn't include the RIAA equalization and wonder why their records sound to tinny.
Back when I still had a tape drive on my main system, I'd boot from the Linux partition and 'dd' the Windows partition to tape after I'd gotten it installed. If Windows happened to scribble on itself (which happened way more often than it should have), I'd simply reboot into Linux again and restore the Windows partition from tape and reboot.
Beat me to it. What will those 600 customers do when they lose staff through retirement or other forms of attrition? They'll have trouble finding new employees with the required technology background.
I'd bet that Broadcom is only looking for short-term financial gains by concentrating on the big fish and, eventually, letting go of those who were mainly servicing the little fish. (Any announcements about that yet?) When this strategy blows up, the people responsible for it will have moved on.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
