no longer mercan?
"ex-US soldier" ?
Should that not be "US ex-soldier", or did he already defect to Russia?
42 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Jan 2014
Weeeeell...
If some cookies are "essential" for website functionality (and I can't reject those) why is my decision (made last time I visited) to NOT consent to the advertising/tracking ones recorded?
Do I HAVE to reject all "non essential" cookies every time I visit the website?
If "essential" cookies can record my username they can bloody hell record my answer to this question the last time I gave it to you...
“I think without [Systemd] Wayland would be effectively impossible,” said Edmundson.
LOL
That means AlienBOB's Slackware64-current runnink the latest plasma5 and wayland should not exist
slackware.uk/people/alien-slacklive/latest/slackware64-live-plasma5-current.iso
You do know google maps has had offline mode for some time, right?
As for detours: it usually suggests a new route if the one I'm at has heavy traffic ahead, but it is just a suggestion (I can still force the original route, but every time I did I regretted it soon after)
Indeed.
Like google, thepiratebay is a search engine.
Google provides hyperlinks, thepiratebay provides magnetlinks: both are just pointers to pirated content, not the pirated content itself (which is not hosted on the search engine).
If thepiratebay must obey "international law" then so does google!
What? Just because they are rich they should be above the law?
Fuck google.
"BTW, Lithium extraction is done by removing salts from water, not blowing up mountainsides. It does have ecological impacts if done poorly, but can bring money to poor places such as Bolivia"
I'm a bit hazy on my high-school geography, but I believe Bolivia doesn't have access to musch see water...
wget is broken and should DIE, dev tells Microsoft
@Paul Crawford,
"over-the-top suppliers" is something americans invented to differentiate "real" ISPs from "virtual" ISPs.
To brasil's law there is no such distinction, and applies to any provider of a service over the internet, as you can read here: http://www.planalto.gov.br/CCIVIL_03/_Ato2011-2014/2014/Lei/L12965.htm
If whatsapp does not like the law in some country it has the option of not doing business there.
If they want to do business somewhere, they have to obey that place's laws.
Just like google has to censor itself in china, and hide results in america due to copyright laws.
Don't like the laws? --> Don't do business there.
Nobody is trying to intimidate math.
The judge is indeed asking that messages (for the "criminals") be recorded before encryption and handed to authorities. Well, not asking... ordering.
As she sees it, whatsapp does indeed have the power to do that. It just doesn't want to.
And no, she is not trying to bypass parliament, as the law that allows her to demand such things already exists.
I'm not saying that they are right or wrong, but judges don't make laws... they enforce them.
Blame the politicians for taking away your freedom to talk privately among yourselves.
Then, blame yourselves for letting them do that in the first place.
Well, that's the thing isn't it?
The article should be " 'mercans sure love FB messenger! " and not " FB messenger is more popular than youtube "...
Need some stats on world wide use, don't we?
I, for one, rather spend hours looking at cat videos than 'talking' to people whom are labeled as 'friends' online.
"Unless that is they were members of the Special Demonstration Squad."
I wasn't referring to the sex bit... but to the fact that undercover lady cops would hardly commit the same crime to entrap a guy for solicitation... which was what Prenda's honeypot was for (catch guys pirating stuff while pirating that same stuff themselves). Clear now?
If what killed Google Glass was mainly privacy issues, they would probably enjoy better success if the initial model did not include a camera.
Once the "cameraless" model was mainstream, then add the camera model option.
I know, I know... without a camera it would only serve as a HUD enabling one to view youtube cat vids while walking... but hey! that's what people want!
"I suppose that all of your "no" answers could be "yes" depending on who's pc/mac/etc. was being remoted... yes, they're thinking of the children and also parental sueballs."
So, the same as gmail app that "may" contain smut/violence... that's why it is rated 17+ so parents don't sue itunes...
oh wait...