Hang on a minute!
I thought that Americans liked guns? They certainly seem to have a lot of them.
Is this really about protecting the profits of gun manufacturers and dealers, perhaps?
544 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Mar 2014
Quite agree. An interview should not be trying to catch someone out, and it shouldn't be a rigid set of questions either. Start with a scenario and see where the conversation goes.
A good interview should discover what the candidate's thought processes are for solving some problem they haven't come across before. What experience do they have of similar problems? How deep is their understanding of the issues? Do they enjoy problem-solving of this kind? Are they willing to make mistakes and then learn from them? Can they communicate effectively in the problem domain? Would they fit in with the existing team?
This is all human judgement, something that "AI" cannot do, even if it ever does become "intelligent".
LLMs are not intelligent, they're statistical pattern matching systems that generate bullshit that may or may not be correct or true.
Here's an idea to make LOTS of money: invent a complicated but impressive bullshit generator, make $$$ from building and improving it, then make more $$$ from selling add-ons that make it more accurate, more correct, or less dangerous.
In general, the best solution to a problem is the simplest solution to the problem. The rush to use AI is just making everything more and more complicated and impossible to understand.
By controlling the money.
They already do: the cost of living crisis isn't unsolvable, the ultra-rich could just pay a bit more in taxes. It's just that the ultra-rich benefit from people having to work multiple jobs for minimal pay. They like having more money than they can spend, it makes them feel important.
Until a revolution against the elites happens...
Since generative AI is essentially bullshit[*], why does the government think that providing bullshit as answers to questions is a Good Idea?
[*] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5
Our Kia e-Niro has sounds when it's moving slower than 20 km/h.
The nice thing is that it has a switch to turn the sounds off, really good at night or in slow-moving traffic jams.
The illegal thing is that it has a "beep beep" sound when reversing, as well as the "engine" noise. The "beep beep" is illegal in the UK for a reversing car. But if you turn the sounds off it's illegal because it doesn't have the required "engine" noise.
FWIW the "beep beep" is incredibly annoying, we can hear another Kia with the same noise several houses down the road! So we turn it off as a matter of course when reversing out of our driveway.
True.
I happen to be a Director of two separate limited companies. Companies House now require their accounts to be linked to "One Login", using email address as the unique key. Since I use a different email address for each company, I now have two "One Login" accounts, both verified with the same passport. So for me it's more like "Two Logins".
I remember the Common Desktop Environment (CDE) for early unix workstations, an attempt at a standard windowing environment for workstations from HP, Sun, IBM and Silicon Graphics. It was "OK".
Nerdy people like customising their UIs, which is why some like me love Vivaldi as a browser. So nerdy people will always result in a proliferation of desktop UIs.
Vague memory: 1986, working with a network (I think coaxial ethernet) of HP workstations running X windows. Where windows would gain focus just by moving the cursor over them. Used to write little scripts to send X commands to the next-door terminal to move a colleague's mouse cursor down by a pixel a second, and see how long it took them to notice.
Or, perhaps even shop at a specialist store (online or IRL) and actually ask a human for advice if you need it.
I will use Amazon as a search engine for "what products are usually available" and "what are they called?", and then will always buy from a different shop. Amazon's near-monopoly does not need to be encouraged. I'm old enough to remember when they only sold books!
There can be no practical reason why Elon Musk (or anyone else, for that matter) NEEDS this amount of money for living and pleasure.
We have a growing problem in the world: the vast majority of monetary wealth is held by just a few ultra-rich people. This causes two major problems:
1) These people have more financial power than whole countries. So they can easily undermine democracy. Then they can change laws so that they can become even richer. This positive feedback loop is very difficult to break.
2) The money the ultra-rich are hoarding is not available to keep countries' economies working. Whole populations are starved of cash that could otherwise be used to pay for public services, and support for those in need. This is why countries are imposing tax rises on populations who have seen living standards fall.
Perhaps the rules should be that if the contract price increases, the customer should be able to cancel the contract without exit fees, and without needing to finish paying for any phone that was included in the deal.
That would focus the minds of the mobile companies suddenly hiking bills beyond reason.
Thank you for introducing me to Jenny and F.O.C.U.S.
While the bullshit-generation is exciting and impressive, it's of very limited use. But the hype has forced politicians to think seriously about how the UK needs to power itself in the next few decades: a Very Good Thing because otherwise these long-term issues are mostly ignored by 5-years-max Parliaments.
Hopefully it'll go:
1. AI hype.
2. Build power capacity for AI.
3. AI bubble bursts.
4. Lots of cheap power available for other things!
Yeah, I'm quite surprised that Ofcom is still making a noise about this. Surely they realise they haven't a hope of extracting any money from 4chan? Would be much better for Ofcom to quietly let this "investigation" get forgotten, and focus on investigations where they do have some legal power.
Major was terrible at media appearances, but actually generated some good policies. That was back in the day when politics was still steered by logic and evidence. Brown also had some good ideas.
The waste-of-space Johnson killed off the use of logic, truth, and consistency, and so killed off the Tory party too. There were still sensible Tories around, but Johnson made sure they all left or got kicked out.
Labour seem to think that it's a Good Idea to pander to noisy idiots, tabloid newspapers, and the ultra-rich. So they've forgotten when they're for. They needed to pump big investments into public services, ASAP, but they're apparently happy to let services crash and burn. Schools, hospitals, GPs, prisons, the legal system, transport, water, power, all struggling to survive. We once were a civilised nation.
I'm sure Farage and his xenophobic fascists will sort it all out! /s
I'm hoping that Zack and the Greens can pull off an election win. He's certainly not afraid of Farage and the right.
Anecdotally, quite a large number of people are already thinking of switching to Linux. Well, certainly more than zero: I have regular requests now for assistance and advice with going Windows 10 to Linux.
My initial advice is to make a bootable USB stick with Linux Mint, and try it out before installing it. The next steps are more tricky, though. Installing involves dual boot, or careful work with disks and partitions, and that gets fiddly to explain. People tend not to have backups of their documents.
So this could be a Good Thing, as people start to take Linux seriously, and discover that it's at least as workable as Microsoft Windows. Even a shift of 10% of home PCs to Linux would provide some much-needed competition in the market.
This is why advertising is SO important to Capitalism. Without the indoctrination that we all have to keep buying shiny things, we could all relax a bit, work a bit, and enjoy life.
Stop watching and reading adverts, cut right down on the "news", and life becomes much nicer.
I'm a director of two small limited companies. Companies House now require directors to register with a Government One Login account to be linked to their directorship record. Which is done by email address.
The problem is that a Government One Login account can't have more than one email address. So I have had to register TWO "One Login" accounts, validating my identity using exactly the same passport details, so that I could connect them to the two email addresses I use for the two companies I'm a director of.
I wonder whether, should this "Digital ID" system come into effect, I could end up with TWO official IDs?
Surely the loans and support should be given to the JLR suppliers, who are suffering through no fault of their own, and not the JLR who (a) messed up and (b) are not about to go bankrupt?
How will JLR use this money? Will they pay their suppliers to supply nothing? Will they order Just-in-Time parts in advance, when they have nowhere to store them?
Had several calls yesterday from a "free loft insulation" company, with oddly Indian-sounding accents and mannerisms. Since they used my fake identity (Fred Smith) and address (a multi-million house in Sandbanks, Poole) I went along with them.
Then a few hours later, a call from an English person from a mobile number, arranging the visit. He insisted that BOTH I and my wife ("joint owners of the house") HAD to be present when the inspector came for the survey. I queried this quite hard, his only explanation was "in case she has any questions". He got my number "from the database" apparently (so not an Indian scam call centre?).
Clearly they wanted to "inspect" and say that essential changes to the insulation needed to be made: then, with both home owners present, they could get signatures to make the work appear completely consensual and legal. It wouldn't surprise me if the "repairs" included lots of spray foam, this instantly ruining the roof and devaluing the property.
I hope they enjoy trying to visit "my" mansion in Dorset!
There's a difference between:
Government propping up a private profit-making company because they made a Really Bad Decision, just so that employees don't get laid off: this could well lead to other private companies expecting to be bailed out too, if they're "too big to fail".
Government supporting people laid off from a private profit-making company that made a Really Bad Decision. This is a normal, everyday thing: society's safety net for when capitalism goes wrong.
Government nationalising said profit-making company, and investing in it to retain the company's services and employment. Unlikely for the case of JLR, but quite likely for things like those water companies that have (deliberately) got themselves into serious financial trouble.