Re: Khan cant
Bit of an assertion there. Is that based on facts, or just "Tory, therefore racist".
2145 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Nov 2013
It is hard to litigate these defamation cases, as well as the copyright ones, as the AI flingers will modify the guardrails to prevent the specific content being produced. This means that unless you capture the offending content, you have no evidence. Rather like a burglar fixing your broken window then claiming that they didn't break in.
Which is crazy, as as far as I can see the Windows client is sort of Electron anyway, isn't it?
The Web client has been deliberately borked, so that it now no longer lets you set custom backgrounds. This means that in some companies, you have to use the Windows client for calls, as it is mandated to use the company backdrop.
AutoHotkey was an absolute boon, I had windows zipping all over the screen wherever I wanted them, with (and this is important) no modality. If a window was 1/4 of the screen, that's the size it was. And cascading windows!
Now, I'm pretty certain with a bit of Python I could create something similar - but it is going to be an uphill struggle.
And why does no Linux desktop allow "cascade all matching windows" any more?
This may be an example of a more widespread problem. The executive branch of our various forms of government really see themselves as "in charge", with the elected members who are notionally "in charge" actually being an obstacle to progress. So it is entirely likely that the councillors were kept in the dark.
I have seen this myself at a public meeting for a planning enquiry (remember them?) where I overheard the Chief Executive of the council complaining to a friendly journalist (who, I noted, did not report it) that "the problem is, these councillors don't realise we have a council to run".
This is why things seem not to change very much. The people we vote for are not really "in charge" in any meaningful sense.
Drive encryption on servers is most definitely a thing. SAP got dinged when some miscreants made off with a load of SSDs (whether still in the rack, or in the discard pile, I don't know). Ah, here it is.
Encryption at-rest is usually a feature of cloud deployments.
And never mind the dissembling and hand-waving about CVE-2018-20225. It requires a Holy Writ about how pip works to be changed, so it's going nowhere.
That was designed to run on any terminal environment - especially a serial-connected one. As such, when editiing, it prioritised updating what you were typing, and then , when there was a gap in the keystrokes, moving the cursor around to update the surrounding text to match. If you watch a touch-typist using it over a 300 baud connection, you see that when text is inserted in the middle of a line, pushing the rest of the line off to the right and re-wrapping the tail-end of the paragraph, only happened in the background.
All on a 3Mhz Z80!
Ditto. Wordstar on a Amstrad CPC6128 did my degree dissertation.
This meant that when I was nearly late for the submission deadline, there were no photocopy places open. So I just printed the entire thing out 3 times on my Canon PW1080a dot matrix, in NLQ mode. I did get the 3 copies onto the counter at the bindery with 30 minutes to spare!
Because non of the telephone operators (mostly BT here) want to spend any money, or forego any revenue. Establishing the bona-fides of call sources, and maintaining allow-lists for each CLID source, cost money. And then they would have to not get paid for carrying the call.
If BT were liable for scams enabled by spoofed CLID, you betcha it would be fixed in days.
Once again "Dur Cloud" is an excuse for no resilience, and no service:
"HM Courts and Tribunals Service took to Xitter to say: "We are aware of users experiencing issues accessing multiple online services. This appears to relate to a global Microsoft Azure outage.""
If this was on-prem, there would be redundancy, as quaintly, we used to think this was important. Now nobody needs to bother as a cloud outage is treated as some kind of natural disaster, instead of a system design failure on the part of the service provider.
Never mind Google. Equifax, TalkTalk, the kind of hack that should (according to the law) resulted in company-ending fines, actually turned into nothingburgers, with the hapless users responsible for the resulting scams 366 days after the event.
And you cannot report fake goods. I bought a wifi mini-pcie card, which when it arrived, it was a junk card with the genuine label attached. So I tried to leave a review pointing out it was fake. The review was blocked. I resubmitted, carefully not using the work "fake". And that was blocked as well.
So, you will not see a review of an item pointing out it's fake. It's "against our community guidelines".
"And thats all you need.".
No.
Because the people paying for this quite reasonably (from their point of view) want to know "How much will this cost?" and "when can I have it?".
Agile hedges these questions with a load of whalesong that does not address the underlying business requirements. Which are, to deliver stuff to paying customers (software, access to SAAS, features) in a predictable way. The customer will stop asking you for things if you never stick to a deadline. So your business goes bust.