Re: I have said this before....
GitLab can have a CoC for the staff, entirely separate to its sales policy. The staff are free to work elsewhere if they don't like it.
The point at which GiLab may change is if they can't hire enough staff.
1761 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Nov 2013
And this is the point that the moaners don't get. The effect of tarrifs is to make the cost benefits of importing less, so the economics of local manufacturing look better. The jobs "lost" in the short term are retail jobs. The gains long term are in manufacturing.
Would you rather buy your phones made by slave labour?
The problem with on-line ads is that they are NOT THE SAME as print advertising. A print ad just adds to the weight of the paper. A billboard just make the place ugly. A TV ad just occupies time.
But online ads are code and can cause me actual monetary loss.
The ad industry is set up to explicitly obscure the source and liability for bad adverts, so there is no incentive for anyone to police bad actors.
I notice Google have no solution for that, as there is money in that murky market.
So, while I would love to enable advertising to sites I visit, to cost is too high.
Notice how Chrome makes the Bookmark manager hidden from casual inspection. The bookmarks bar is also hidden by default. As others have said, you are supposed to ask Google every time you want a site- if you typed it in, you obviously want it badly enough to know its name, instead of just blindly clicking on something. Plus, you might click on $site's sponsored link instead!
Face it. The vast majority of Facebook users will be very happy. They can now share bills, lend each other a few quid, buy stuff from each other, with no friction.
The real worry is that its ubiquity causes it to be the default way of processing micropayments for web sites. Now you must be logged in to Facebook to browse the web. The end times are nigh.
Hmmm. APC and SLAs. The upses I have seen from them keep the batteries so fully charged (to meet the runtime specs) that the cells melt in a couple of years. Yes, melt, swell, get stuck in the chassis, get crazy hot. If they were just a little more conservatively charged they would last for a lot longer.
In my youth, I had to drive to Bournmouth from Stevenage for a training thing. I planned to drive, so proposed this to the PTB. All was peachy, until I pointed out that my engine was 3 litre, whereupon a crappy Fiat Punto was rented.
It was probably more expensive, but the steep slope on the mileage rates by engine capacity was for the bosses in their Jaguars, not PFYs in second-hand Vauxhall Senators!
The cookie dialog should say:
"Access to badgerbotherers.com is not free.
Click >here< to select a subscription option,
or >here< to continue, and pay for access by sharing tracking information.
Click >here< for information on what information we capture, and who we share it with"
There is no actual reason why a web site should be free. Since the dialog is now just about payment options, the issue of GDPR does not arise, as the information<>access trade is now explicit.
Thanks for that!
I didn't realise you could do that. Now I can edit the source data without using the lame Base UI for it.
It now points out what the problem is - the merge only runs from "registered" databases. he temporary link to the speadsheet isn't registered.
This means that
1) You end up with your global database space being full of all the mail merge sources you have ever used, and
2) you can't ship the source doc and the spreadsheet to someone else for them to do the merge.
So, still massively broken.
Ha! yes, then actually try it.
It might have worked in 2011 when the article was written but now it's busted.
Create a Writer doc, use "Exchange Databases" (wtf?) as described. Add some fields to the doc.
Save.
Now open it again.
The link to the spreadheet is gone.
Any attempt to perform the merge crashes Writer.
These devices have an uncontrolled, always-on way for the host machine to access and modify the BMC firmware and memory for development purposes. And it's on in production?
And the board with the chips on has no jumper/DIP switch to enable/disable the access?
Are these guys just lazy, or is the cost of 2 pins and a jumper just too much.
Once again somebody elses' convenience and profit socialises all of our security costs.
Bah!
I did the shaming trick once or twice.
<slight pause>
"You do know what you are doing, right? Would your parents be proud of you for getting a job, defrauding vulnerable people over the phone? Mine certainly wouldn't"
... and such like. One said "Oh" in a small, crestfallen tone and hung up.
Normally, you don't abuse cold-callers - they are just doing a job. But anyone working in one of these places knows that they are cheating people, so whatever makes them give up is OK.
You young'uns....
Back in the day, you could not clone IDE drives using dd (bit-copying the whole drive) because the IDE firmware kept the bad-block map on an accessable, but unused part of the initial few tracks. If you did, the destination drive ran really slowly until it repaired the map - if it ever did!