Re: Cybercrime...
The vacation facilities in the Mother Land might leave a little to be desired. I hear they are a bit drafty and can get rather cold especially in Siberia.
4138 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Nov 2013
With traditional licensing and sales basically flatlining or falling it is not surprising that someone would try Hollywood accounting to make the books look good. The problem with Hollywood accounting is it not about padding numbers but inflating costs in such away to move the actual profits to the studios pockets in such a way movies show a paper loss. Leisure Larry's minions forgot the first rule of creative accounting - you have to have actual profits to move.
I would go further, all scientific papers and research should be freely available. To achieve this will require some major changes in how scientific publishing is done. As one noted, running servers is not particularly expensive, peer review and editorial review is done for free. So the major cost is will be running a smallish server farmer.
Fresh set of eyes as noted earlier which means a fresh set of tests and ideas. Google is at least admitting that they, like all other software providers, tend to be blind to certain bugs. This is natural. No matter how good, one will not think of all the weird ways the code be stressed.
There was an effort recently to replicate results, I believe in psychology, and the replication failure rate was horrendous. Having read some on the basic experimental design problems, often these studies suffered from poor design, improper use of statistics, very small sample sizes, poorly chosen samples, and worst of all a failure to understand correlation does not equal causation.
Winbloat phones and various W10 stupidities actually point to a fundamental misunderstanding of the market. Customers use devices that conveniently solve their problems. They are not particularly loyal to Winbloat, OS X, Android, Chrome OS, or even Linux or to specific hardware manufacturers. If they find something that solves a set of problems at price they like they are likely to bite. They will stay loyal as long as they believe the vendor(s) are willing to provide workable solutions to their problems. Apple, Google, and weirdly many Linux distros grasps this - it is the users' needs that the define success or failure not what the vendor wants. Slurp is ignoring a basic marketing premise.
Slurp has blinded themselves by thinking users want Winbloat because it is Winbloat on any and all devices. In reality, many never really cared what the OS is only that the device ecosystem solves their problems. If is Winbloat, Slurp gets a piece of the action. If it is Android, iOS, or OS X, Slurp does not get a piece of the action. The fact that many seem content with different OSes on different devices points to the fact customers are loyal to themselves first not to Slurp, Apple, Google, etc.
I partially disagree with the lack of apps. It is more accurately the lack of good useful apps that users want. The absolute numbers is relatively meaningless since most apps are not that good. On Android, Google has provide a set of solid apps so the phone is useful to users. There are often better ones available but one has solid set to start with.
The allure of "write once run anywhere" is reduces the development time. But as noted by many others, each device and device class has a set of unique capabilities and requirements. Either one exploits those capabilities or they are ignored. In the first instance, the software is basically crippleware on all devices because it has to run on what is common to all. In the second case one is deliberately providing crippleware and a superior bit suitable for the device will always be preferred.
The real key is to focus on how the software is going to be used and the best devices for that use.
Slurp failed to understand that mobile devices serve a very different need than a PC/laptop. On a phone, one wants apps that allow one to do certain (limited) things very easily. Most are not going to write the great American novel on it; wrong tool. But Slurp, being run by idiots, decided everyone has to use Winbloat and cross platform apps. The cross platform apps either will be useless on a PC, overwhelm the phone, or more likely do something in a half-arsed manner.
The major problem with feral case is the guy reported the problems, apparently, appropriately (or at least tried to). The fact that both problems are caused by the incompetence and (criminal?) negligence of others makes this a dodgy case. More than likely the feral shyster is taking the easy way to protect criminal cronies by hanging the white hat out to dry.
What is overlooked is this should have a friendly jury for Leisure Suit Larry and his minions. The jury had no IT skills, just ordinary Joes and Jills. They should have been dazzled by his shyster BS merchants. However, Leisure Suit forgot one thing; many ordinary Joes and Jills are very intelligent and can smell a stinking pile miles away.
This is crucial because Foggy Bottom has stated she lied, violated various required administrative procedures, and broadly hints that she committed multiple feral felonies. Blowhard will have a field day with this and ramp up the pressure to indict her by ferals before the election.
The key is that Android devices far out sell all Winbloat devices no matter what Slurp says. This has several implications for Slurp and Winbloat. They are not the dominant force they were about 10 years ago but just another vendor heavily concentrated in business. Also, this means many are used to the idea of using multiple OSes which means they no longer see a need to be all Winbloat or even consider Winbloat if they perceive another is better suited. Slurp is in danger of losing the home market entirely which means they will need to fight hard to keep the business market.
He probably has a deal to plead but has to cooperate with the feral investigation of Hildabeast. His testimony is rather damning about Hildabeast's email antics. It implies that the every spookhaus has all her emails and has read much highly classified US information. This puts her in the bullseye for very serious felony charges with a near certain conviction; that is if the US is not a very large, nuclear armed banana republic.
@robidy - While 2FA will stop many attacks it will not stop all. But there is a related issue of what transaction size will automatically trigger human intervention/interaction. It seems like there is none at the current time so one is dependent solely on perfect security/use of the credentials.
@ moiety - I see the same major problem, who is defining what as terrorism? I think the knee jerk reaction is great they are doing something but the more subtle question is who the authoritative source for what constitute terrorism? Truthfully, some of the groups/agencies they might use are lacking in integrity that any list they produce will have a political bias depending on what the PHBs want.
@Grease Monkey - The difference is the source of the information; it is publicly available. Extortion is difficult to prove when someone can find the information with a little from Facebook and Google. What the FTC nailed him on was fraud and false advertising; serious enough to make him very damaged goods. He now has a permanent record of a serious enforcement action against him. In some industries, this could lead to no job offer or a firing if found out.
It depends on what the paper actually covers, which I have not read. Prior may have been based on noticing that the results are more random but was it based on sound math? The paper may be giving a sound math basis for using and how to use 2 random number sources to make a better random number. This could be the difference between solid engineering (it works but we are completely sure why) and solid math explaining how it works.
@Doctor Syntax - Gartner is ignoring the fact that PCs are still useful for many people and many purposes. They are not looking at basic economic history of what happens when a market matures. Unit sales do not grow and sometimes decline for a period. There will be a vendor shakeout because the manufacturing capacity is too large for the market and some will not make it through the contraction.
There are many places in the US (and Canada) that are very reasonable places to live. One common mistake many make is underestimating the size of the US or Canada compared to say UK or France. For example to drive across the US or Canada is a multi-day journey, the distance is roughly the same as crossing the Atlantic Ocean. Also, parts of both are very sparsely populated, particularly northern Canada and the western US.
Blowhard can not drop the bombshell that convicts Hildabeast. He is not POTUS nor does he have any access to the information the ferals have that would destroy her politically. The mostly likely non-feral source of such a bombshell would be from the Russians or Chinese if either publish the emails from Hildabeast's email server. Contrary to her claims, I would be shocked if both did not have all her emails. If Hildabeast is indicted it would by current donkey administration deciding to make her toast for internal donkey reasons. They are not overly fond of Hildabeast and Bubba.
A major problem with many is ideas is the hype machine gets a hold of them while they are still in the early development. I am not familiar with uBeam and their idea but it sounds like it is not ready for commercial release. It may prove to be an idea that sounds good on paper but will not be a market success even if it works reasonable well.
The hype machine is looking for the next major financial windfall but is badly underestimating the difficulties of bring a product to market.