Re: which distro will be adopted?
I don't think anyone is predicting an easy, or a quick transition, but if the Gendarmerie and the municipality of Lyon can do it, and if there is the will, then it might just happen.
355 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Oct 2013
… perhaps no one single distro, but my bet would be that Emmabuntüs will do very well. https://emmabuntus.org/
This is huge for GNU/Linux - as big a validation as it is a condemnation of proprietary software. (And a huge loss in revenue for M$)
It also puts Linux very much in the spotlight - millions of new Linux users.
I also hope that this will mean that government-financed education moves to open source software.
And businesses will no-doubt take a look too.
(Genuinely)
The subtext is always that Linux is niche - sub 10% when you exclude Android users - but ofcourse that still amounts to millions of Linux users worldwide, and it's nice to be in the company of some of them here.
I do ask myself why others didn't/don't migrate when they get burned though - 32bit -> 64bit / Win11 lockout / whatever… Obviously I've heard all the excuses, and a lot of them sound flaky. I've come to the conclusion that with operating systems, as with banks, electricity providers, etc., people are simply reluctant to switch.
Maybe I'm atypical… I became a Linux zealot because of "planned obsolescence". I was so angry about big tech's unpublshed move, that I vowed never to use their hardware or software again. I finally took open source seriously : I won't be locked into an ecosystem again.
I'd be just as annoyed today if I was affected by Micro$oft's decision to abandon hundreds of thousands of perfectly serviceable machines - especially at a time when hardware prices are going up.
I don't know so much… it would appear that Trump has Europe rattled.
And being made publically aware of vulnerabilities should be a wake-up call to any political administration.
We all know that there are parts of Germany and France well on board with FOSS already - Denmark and Spain too. Only last week there was news about the French government rejecting US voip apps in favour of a home-grown alternative - https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/27/france_videoconferencing_visio/ Obviously, it would be good to see them go further…
But from what Liam was saying, there seems to have been strong arguments all round in favour of FOSS - economic, security, dependability/reliability, privacy,… It's gone beyond being a philosophical debate, and is perhaps being recognised as an imperative.
An excellent piece. Thank you Liam.
It's encouraging to hear that Europe's politicians are finally understanding the benefits of FOSS.
That they see the advantage of "Public money : Public code."
And that some EU entities are moving in the right direction.
It's good to hear the UN endorsing open source too.
Well, we know that Google likes to market Android as "the world's most popular mobile operating system" but there are actually no shortage of possible alternative touch-screen OSs :
- Samsung, the smartphone market leader with 19.7% market share has Tizen (not based on AOSP),
- As you say, second placed Huawei, with 18% of the market, has HarmonyOS, which is moving away from a dependence on AOSP, and
- 4th-placed Xiaomi, on 14.4%, has HyperOS.
In fact, looking at it, Chinese marufacturers have >50% market share, when you include Vivo (9%), OPPO (9%), ZTE and OnePlus, and we know of "China's" intention to be free of US IP…
There's been a lot of talk of late about sovereignty - and US cloud storage and Microslop is usually mentioned alongside that. But actually, Google was the company that originally brought spyware to the masses. Surely the EU & China should be looking to - and financially supporting - one of the Linux-based initiatives such as postmarketOS or Ubuntu Touch.
Well…
Firstly they have their own operating system - Tizen - and app ecosystem. These days Tizen is mostly confined to their TVs (and I've heard it said that it's preferable to Android TV, but I wouldn't know). However, in the past, Samsung have marketed Tizen smartphones, and could fairly easily do so again. Tizen is obviously Google-free, making it acceptable in some regions.
Secondly, although they have chosen to use Qualcomm chips, they also design and build their own silicon, so they're not beholden to Western chip design companies. And
Thirdly, they've been involved with RISC-V since 2017, and are said to have some RISC-V ISA CPU designs, so they are not dependent on Arm Holdings either.
All these elements, whilst undoubtedly being contingency at the moment, nevertheless puts pressure on Google, Qualcomm and Arm. As you say, Samsung is a big player, and the loss of - or just a decline in - their custom would be keenly felt.
"How so?"
As per the headline, really! Distancing themselves with both hardware and software.
You're right to suggest that Samsung have a business model similar to other tech giants: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Huawei and Samsung are all cows that produce both milk and beef, to use your analogy.
I'd just like to see the market swing towards self-hosting, tbh. I think it's more of an education issue than a legislation issue: average Jo/e doesn't realise
- what the cloud is
- where they are
- the amount of energy they use or
- their potential vulnerabilities.
Perhaps people would make better choices if they were better informed.
My blood pressure spiked at a paragrah I read in Forbes :
“Don’t wait until the last minute,” the Windows-maker has just warned the 750 million users sticking with Windows 10 for now at least… If your PC hardware is eligible for the free Windows 11 upgrade, then do that now. If it’s not eligible, do not try to upgrade your PC — instead look at recycling OR LANDFILL. :/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2025/04/12/microsofts-free-upgrade-offer-for-500-million-windows-users/
Apparenfly, according to Distrowatch -
https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20250127#sitenews
- Facebook now deems Linux to be malware, which is ironic, since Meta itself uses Linux.
Malware
n.
Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer functions or SENDS PERSONAL DATA ABOUT THE USER TO UNAUTHORIZED PARTIES OVER THE INTERNET.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Malware
As this article suggests, it's doubly ironic since Microsoft harvests your data.
With respect to the judge, I can't see mediation working : Arm seem to feel it their right to demand their pound of flesh - oddly, in the form of destroying years of revenue-generating work, rather than the more prosaic and lucrative financial remuneration.
And Arm's vow to seek a retrial makes little sense either... Qualcomm's licenses would probably be up for renegotiation before it got to court, judging by how long the process took this time. Plus, why demand a retrial when there's just as much chance of losing again?
Reuters - "Arm Holdings' lawsuit against Qualcomm ended on Friday with a jury delivering a mixed verdict that found for Qualcomm on a crucial issue, saying Qualcomm had properly licensed its central processor chips."
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-jury-deadlocked-arm-trial-193123475.html?guccounter=1
The disruptive nature of the permissively open RISC-V ISA encourages the prodding of the received orthodoxy, and produces unexpected solutions, like the Universal Processor here : https://www.ubitium.com/press-release-series-seed/
That has to be healthy for the industry, whether other tacks are eventually taken or not.