* Posts by The_Idiot

322 posts • joined 20 Sep 2013


US senators propose yet another problematic Section 230 shakeup: As long as someone says it on the web, you can't hide it away


"People are...

... (somewhat) protected from government censorship by the first amendment."

No. With respect, 'people' aren't. You might, possibly, be able to make an argument that 'people resident in the US' might be - but then there's that whole thing about (for example) the Census that is currently getting debate between 'people resident in the US' and 'US citizens'. So maybe you could offer an argument that 'US citizens are (somewhat) protected from government censorship by the first amendment.' However, the concept of 'people' is, I suggest, rather larger than that. And yes, this is legislation in the US - but the US sometimes seems to have a rather loose definition of where US law should/ does apply on occasion, no?

You there. Person, corp, state. Doesn't matter. You better not shoot down or hack a drone. That's our job – US govt


Of course...

... the issuing of this advice is not to be taken by _anyone_ to raise the possibility the Agencies mentioned just launched fleets of Q drones bearing nondescript markers, but highly adept at electronic and visual monitoring. _Nobody_ would do _that_ -er, would they? Um... _would_ they?

Texas jury: Apple on the hook for half a billion dollars after infringing 4G LTE patents



... rounded corners are _real_ IP and inviolable - just ask Apple!

Trump bans Feds from contracting H-1B workers and makes telehealth the new normal


Re: Finder's fee or mafia-style shakedown?

With respect, my post related to 'but it would be much much (much) better if you just posted them in cleartext.' as a principle rather than this example. While this link may not be a perfect or even good example, the principle embedded in WCAG H30 is _not_ to post links as text, but to post descriptive text to display in an anchor. Specific WCAG version requirements exist in Section 508 of the US Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (WCAG 2.0), though not, as far as I am aware, in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.


Re: Finder's fee or mafia-style shakedown?


Better for some perhaps - but not for a screen reader assisted peruser of Register Pages.

From the WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard:

H30 - Providing link text that describes the purpose of a link for anchor elements

"The objective of this technique is to describe the purpose of a link by providing descriptive text as the content of the a element. The description lets a user distinguish this link from other links in the Web page and helps the user determine whether to follow the link. The URI of the destination is generally not sufficiently descriptive."

Example 1

Describing the purpose of a link in HTML in the text content of the a element.

(anchor open tag href= tag)"routes.html"(end anchor open tag)

Current routes at Boulders Climbing Gym

(anchor close tag)

It's been five years since Windows 10 hit: So... how's that working out for you all?


You need to faff about with group policy's firewall...

... Well, or (as one alternative) have an edge firewall not on the Windows device so Windows installs can't touch it - UTM or otherwise. But yes, that still generally requires more than the non-technical user can (through no fault of their own) bring to the table.

Keep it Together, Microsoft: New mode for vid-chat app Teams reminds everyone why Zoom rules the roost


Re: Keep my Camera on?

... and even with work issued 'must have a camera' devices, the joys of electrical tape are hard for Redmond or anyone else to fight... :-). So yay for strips of adhesive backed rubber!

Twitter, Reddit and pals super unhappy US visa hopefuls have to declare their online handles to Uncle Sam



... given all the comments in all the places that 'Anonymous Coward' has made, you're pretty certain not to get a visa then. And since they now know who you are - listen for the black helicopters, perhaps?

US lawmakers get a second shot at forcing FBI agents to obtain a warrant before they leaf through web histories


Re: Think of the Children!

I know - I know. What comes next in this post is nothing new to most folks here. But - sigh. Once more around the lighthouse.

1: Anything - _anything_ - can be put to a purpose that is either not the intended one - or a use of the 'thing' that may be illegal, objectionable or otherwise pernicious.

2: The argument that 'because (thing) can be used by some people improperly should mean nobody can use it' therefore leads to 'nobody should be permitted to use anything'.

Here comes the obligatory example - feel free to look away. And no, I'm not going to talk guns - nor Amendment related issues. I'm going to offer something directly relate-able, in my view, to Mr Passoff's point. Because cameras, both still and video, are a direct tool of the people and purpose he finds unacceptable (and as to the people and purpose, I do not necessarily disagree). So therefore, would he care to take up the cause of banning all still and video cameras? That would serve to significantly limit child abuse, surely? Or if not to ban them, to insist all still and video camera be modified to send copies of all still and videos record to a government agency for analysis and review? From his perspective, to allow people the unfettered right to record images and video may indeed be important to them, but surely it should not come at the expense of the potential and actuality of child sex abuse? Or is that somehow 'different'?

Sigh. OK - I'll shut up now. Grump. With extra grump.

BoJo buckles: UK govt to cut Huawei 5G kit use 'to zero by 2023' after pressure from Tory MPs, Uncle Sam


Re: Is it wrong to be in favour of this?


With genuine and sincere respect, if the position of the signatories of the US Constitution were 'unassailably correct', then logically, philosophically and legally there would be no such thing as an 'Amendment', no? To amend is to change, to change is to challenge and prevail - and to challenge is to assail. Or am I missing something? After all, I'm an Idiot... :-)


Re: Is it wrong to be in favour of this?


"democracy is tyranny of the 51%". I see. So what would you prefer? The 'tyranny of the less than 50%'? The 'tyranny of the Electoral College'? The 'tyranny of the Corporations'? In any system where decisions are made through a process (and even rolling dice can be seen as a 'tyranny' for those who like buzz phrases), there is always a 'tyranny' of some kind. The 'tyranny' of 'whoever decides'. The very establishment of a system of government, _any_ system of government, can be seen as the establishment of a 'tyranny' - at least, seen that way by those who disagree with the decisions imposed by the system. But to each their own marketing language - and their own debates.


Re: Is it wrong to be in favour of this?


I respectfully suggest you and Chris the bean counter go sit in a corner and debate your views. He was the one who said, quite emphatically, that the USA _is_ a democracy. However, I would hold to my view. While Person A thinks 'democracy' is a mongoose, and Person B thinks it's a liquid, while Person C thinks it's round and Person D thinks it's a pink petunia - none of them can debate whether something 'is' or 'is not' democracy. Not because the word is meaningless - but because it has _too_many_ meanings. Which pretty much results in it appearing meaningless, and hence not a worthwhile element of discussion, debate or communication.


Re: Is it wrong to be in favour of this?

"Also USA is a democracy" Well - maybe. It depends on your definition of 'democracy'. The US President is not elected by the will of the majority of the people (of course, neither is the UK's Prime Minister). Russia holds elections where people get to 'vote', though arguably the offering of only one candidate limits the 'power of the vote'.

The US President is not elected by US voters. She or he is elected by the will of a much smaller group of generally older and well connected people. People who currently legally may or may not choose to vote how the electorate in their State told them to (the Electoral college). In short, I would suggest 'democracy' is a marketing catch phrase these days, not a definition. Thoughts?

NHS contact tracing app isn't really anonymous, is riddled with bugs, and is open to abuse. Good thing we're not in the middle of a pandemic, eh?


Re: One would have throught...

And yes, that sort of thing could have been a potentially viable solution. This one, as far as I can tell, isn't it. But they're still marketing it as 'serving advertised purpose' and also 'totally anonymous'. If it _had_ been the type of solution you describe, and if they _had_ implemented a full release of source code to back their claims - then maybe. But not with what I've seen and heard of _this_ code.


One would have throught...

... that developing something that tells you 'someone unknown' came into potentially contagious contact with 'some somebody else-s unknown' would hardly serve the stated purpose. Equally, even if you know 'Person X' came into contact with a a bunch of 'somebody unknown-s', you're hardly going to be much further forward.

So to engage in contagion limitation you pretty much have to know Person X came into contact with Person Y, Z, F, K etc - _and_ know which, if any, of those people had been infected, or come into contact with those infected. Thus making any pretense of 'it's OK, it's all aninny... er, anumby... er, 'nobody knows who anyone being tracked really _is_' rather self defeating. If you're going to sell BS, at least don;t try to tell people they're just imagining the smell...

Spyware maker NSO can't claim immunity, Facebook lawyers insist – it's time to face the music


On a side note...

"... contractors working with the US government qualify for immunity. But US law doesn't recognize such immunity for those working with foreign governments."

Ah. The 'that's different' legal position. Got it.

If it's Goodenough for me, it's Goodenough for you: Canuck utility biz goes all in on solid-state glass battery boffinry


There are, I...

... would suggest, a lot of fair comments made here. Comments, often perfectly valid, negatively comparing ICE and EV modes of transport, and why commenters would/ will never switch from ICE. Things like short ranges, the scarcity of fueling and fueling infrastructure stops for EV, the dangers of battery explosion - many others.

I think, and not intending in any way to shoot at those who have made those comments, that nearly every one, or maybe even every one, might have been offered long ago, when the debate was between the horse and those new-fangled infernal combusted whatchamamcallums. The horse, it could stop and eat some grass at a pinch, or oats at one of the many farms around. The infernal devices? Nary a fuel stop in site, and the fuel itself went bang, or had the potential to go bang, rather more than grass or oats. Range? Hah! Whether a decent rider and a good horse or (with apologies to Roger Cook / Roger Greenaway / Tony Macaulay), high speed runs with horse changes (a la Pony Express) would beat any infernally-thing. And as to skill sets for refueling, the horse took care of most of it, and people learned to ride across the class boundaries, not like those cumbustickles,, that only rich folk could use.

Hear that fluttering sound? It's the pages of history, flipping by. Hang on a moment, because....

There. Or rather, here. Now horses are for the well off, and largely (in the 'developed world') for recreation. And those comcbstickle things? They're every-bloody-where. With gas stations, and sealed fuel tanks, and processes for getting from A to B that even still-at-school teenagers can manage.

So do I think the comments here are wrong? Nope, probably not. Do I think, with a few more of those fluttered pages in our ears, they may _become_ wrong? Hell, yes. And after enough pages have turned, maybe the combustickles will be recreational vehicles, running only on recreational tracks - and people get there and go home in EVs, with easy powering/ refueling/ infrastructure - and at the weekend drive to see Great Grand Mom, and hear her say how she never could abide these new-fangled elektricky things...

It's alright. I'll stop now - I promise (blush) :-).

US Homeland Security mistakenly seizes British ad agency's website in prostitution probe gone wrong


Re: So...


"Yes, it is. In fact, you will commit several crimes if you do that."

Apparently not according to a US Judge and court:




Killing someone by shooting across the US border into Mexico isn't a crime because the crime bit - the death - didn't take place in the US even though the shooting bit did. But a UK web site is fair game for US law because, um, mumblety-mumble. something-something, er...?

Departing MI5 chief: Break chat app crypto for us, kthxbai


Re: Let's think about this...

@Version 1.0

"think of a world where there is no encryption"

Um, no. I'd really rather not, if you don't mind. Encryption is just math. So 'think of a world without encryption' really means 'think of a world without math' (I'm going to put encipherment on one side for a moment). I'm afraid the implications of 'a world without math' are, I would suggest, far more horrible than anything encryption may bring. Not, I mean, a world 'where nobody knows/ has invented math'. A world 'without math'. Heck, it's hard to see how such a world could exist at all - but I'm not going to even try. Ewwwwww,


Re: So GCHQ...

@Jamie Jones

"(I thought we were innocent until proven guilty?)"

Well, they did sort of get rid of that, but they worked out they're safe anyway. "We hereby define the proof of guilt as the absence of proof of innocence. Since nobody can prove they're innocent, everybody is therefore guilty! Guilty as charged! Er - as soon as we think up some charges!"


OK, so lets...

... try again. In language even a politician should understand.

Question (yes or no): You technical folks. Yes, we know 1+3 must equal 4. But surely you can come up with a clever way to make it equal 7, or maybe 2, so long as we produce a warrant? Oh, and only for us - everyone else gets 4. OK? Thanks.

Crypto. It's mathematics, not a debate, or a vote in the house.

I spy, with my little satellite AI, something beginning with 'North American image-analysis code embargo'


Sounds like...

... declaring encryption technology to be a 'munition' and putting similar controls on it. Er - someone remind me. How did _that_ work out? About as well as declaring alcohol illegal, at least as far as I recall.

Trump Administration fast-tracks compulsory border facial recognition scans for all US citizens


Re: Not surprising


"Gov. Gary R. Herbert (R) said in a statement that he “is committed to ensuring that Utah’s facial recognition system will only be used for law enforcement purposes and never against law-abiding Utahns.”"

Now to be filed under 'well, I was only joking', maybe?


Re: Not surprising


Well, given the current state of 'politici-speak', I suggest the key weasel word here will be 'against'. They'll argue it isn't being used _against_ US citizens, because it's being used to 'protect' them and 'increase their security', so it's being used _for_ US citizens. Sigh...

Interpol: Strong encryption helps online predators. Build backdoors


So which...

... police, security or government agency is going to issue a notification against backdoors because they 'help identity thieves (including, but not limited to, property title thieves), people who want to break into your bank account, credit card cloners, stalkers, rogue newspaper editors and reporters, insurance fraudsters, tax fraudsters, blackmailers, political agents, foreign countries interfering with elections, rogue security and police opera... er, no, not those. Of course, _they_ don't exist. Right? Er, I mean... right?

Yes, and lots of others.

I see. Kind of quiet all of a sudden, huh? Well, apart from folks like those who come here, who often (not always - I come here too (blush)) know what they're talking about. Sigh...

Just a friendly reminder there were no at-the-time classified secrets on Clinton's email server. Yes, the one everyone lost their minds over


Re: Oh gods, not this again

@anonymous Coward - Is this where people get to remind you that, according to the popular vote, 'the people' _did_ want her, it was the Electoral College that didn't? Or am I in the wrong illogical-expression-of-personal-opinion thread?

Here we go again: US govt tells Facebook to kill end-to-end encryption for the sake of the children


So logically...

... they should be asking for/ demanding every room in every building has concealed microphones 'only accessible by law enforcement', every outside area have microphones situated in suitably mapped overlap zones 'only accessible by law enforcement', so as to ensure people don't have non-electronic conversations not 'available only to law enforcement'. Would that be OK? By their standards, I mean? Because, after all, there would never be any reason for people to object to such a level of surveillance, because of, like, terrorists, the children and people maybe stealing the newspaper the paper boy threw on their stoop. And _no_ possibility that 'Bad Guys(tm)' would _ever_ be able to gain access to what the microphones recorded, right? Right? Er.... right?


MIT boffins turn black up to 11 with carbon nanotubes that absorb 99.995% of light


Re: Cue for a song...

I blush, and you are of course correct. Could I get away with 'it's old age and too much Tequila'?


Cue for a song...

... with apologies to Los Lobos.

Black is black, I want my diamond back

It's safe to say, my rock's done gone away, oh oh

Damn nanotubes, 'cos they're carbon too...

US regulators push back against White House plan to police social media censorship


Re: Except ...


"but nothing - not congress, not the president, nor a treaty they sign, can eclipse the constitution. Nothing."

Er - you missed some words. 'In and under US jurisdiction'. The US Constitution has no force in this thing called 'the rest of the world'.

Uncle Sam is asking Americans if they could refrain from slapping guns on their drones


Re: Where in "keep and bear arms" does it say anything about them not being attached to an aircraft?


"The moment you're not touching the arm, you are not bearing it."

Hmmm. So it's therefore only legal to have guns if you're actually touching them! So storing them at home, under any conditions where you're not touching them, are illegal! And so are guns in holsters (you're touching the hostler if it's on your body, not the gun)! And gun racks on trucks! And...

OK, OK. I know. Back to the drawing board - sigh :-).

And you thought the cops were bad... Civil rights group warns of facial recog 'epidemic' across UK private sites



Room for an enterprising app here :-).

1: Establish (possibly crowd sourced data) database of all facial recognition camera locations.

2: App polls database, polls phone location.

3: If (Current location) (close enough) (facial recognition camera location) then (automatically file pre-templated GDPR information request)

That might get a little expensive for someone :-).

Apple: Ok, ok, we'll stop listening in on your Siri conversations. For now, but maybe in the future


Re: What the article leaves out

"there isn't any way for them to search for other recordings for that particular person"

Well, with respect, 'there isn't any way' can, like most absolutes (and potentially all of them, but I wouldn't wish to use an absolute (blush)) trip you up. Recordings could, at least in principle, be processed for audio pattern recognition (I'm not fond of the term 'voiceprint'). Would it be 100% reliable? Probably not. Would it qualify as 'a way to search for other recordings for that particular person'? I would suggest it might - but, of course, I'm an Idiot, so I'm sure others (and possibly you) might think otherwise :-).


Re: ..or, perhaps, don't buy one in the first pla

"...ONLY the terminally stupid"

Perhaps not. Maybe high-risk, low capability individuals, like my wife, who has advanced Multiple Sclerosis and is totally wheelchair bound? We can't afford day-time or live-in care, so while I'm at work, she's on her own. While the FUCKING LIVE MICROPHONE system (and recording/ playback) I have in place is NOT Siri, it is _still_ a fucking live microphone, so if something bad happened I would stand a chance of knowing. Does that make her, in your view, 'terminally stupid'? You are, of course, entitled to your opinion either way.

FTC fines Facebook $5bn for making users believe they actually had control over their data


"These orders mean Facebook will...

"... be forced to make its execs accountable for the decisions they make"

And the fact that this can be stated as something to be imposed, and not something automatic and explicit across all execs in all companies in all industries is itself a huge part of the problem - at least, in my view.

"Oh, we broke the law? Ah. Oops. Well, we didn't mean it, honest. Here's some money. So that's alright then, right?" No. It isn't. You broke the law? Go to court, get found guilty and go to jail.

Take the bus... to get some new cables: Raspberry Pi 4s are a bit picky about USB-Cs


Re: Does this mark the transition to...

"Does this mark the transition to Apple Pi"?

No - that would be the Apple iP - because these days Apple think _everything_ is Apple iP.

I know. I'm sorry - I'd apologise, but I probably wouldn't mean it (blush).

The latest FCC plan to boost US broadband? Prevent competition in apartment blocks


Re: Had this for years already


Sadly (for you at least), I can tell you don't live in a decent sized (for audience pool) condo in Toronto. Where I live, the building was originally established with cable. The cable's still there if you're mad enough to want it. However, at least two companies are now also in the building offering fiber to the apartment. Both of them came in at their own expense and established infrastructure as needed. If Apartment A has Company 1 fiber, and Apartment B next door has Company 2? Well, no big - two strands of string down the hall in the ceiling voidspace. I know at least one of those companies does not require a fixed term contract, because I'm with them - 250 Mbs symetric uncapped, for C$50 a month. I could have 1Gbps for C$100 if I needed it. Oh - and because I asked, they give me a naked transducer so I can run my own firewall/ routing. If I wanted to get really paranoid I could have both of them run a line to me and have failover.

Ah yes. But that's Canada - so behind them times compared to the US, right?

Sinister secret backdoor found in networking gear perfect for government espionage: The Chinese are – oh no, wait, it's Cisco again


Re: "they do not favour the Americans"

"Even if Cisco equipment has NSA-supported backdoors, that's the United States NSA, not the Peoples' Republic of China — a major threat to, if not enemy of, the United States."

Right. Because the United States are well known not to be a threat to any of their 'allies' under the current (or potentially previous) regimes. They don 't use economic action as a form of political coercion, don't act against those (European or otherwise) allies, don't try to enforce their good at the expense of others. Got it, sir. Right. If it's good for the US, it's good for - um, the US. And everybody else should accept that as 'good enough', yes?


Owner of Smuggler's Inn B&B ordered to put up a sign warning guests not to cross into Canada


It's borderline, but...



"The Haskell Free Library, which straddles the U.S.-Canada border, is home to an array of novels, an opera house and — for a brief time — international gun smugglers.

The heritage building was built in 1904 and is the only library in the world to straddle a border, between the towns of Derby Line, Vt., and Stanstead, Que. There is a black line on the library floor marking the divide.

You enter the building through the U.S., but the circulation desk and most of the books are in Canada. The reading room is in both countries. The building’s unique layout may be why it was an attractive location for a Montreal man to smuggle handguns into Canada."

You were warned and you didn't do enough: UK preps Big Internet content laws


Re: Here we go...

Lord Jake

Not entirely sure how you get 'anti' from the text posted in that position - but as you wish, sir :-).


Here we go...

... again. Sigh.

Content provider A is based in Country 1. Among other things, they make available content. Let's say, with no intention at all of offending anyone including the Sultan of Brunei, that content includes male-male an*l interpersonal activity. Said content is found to be legal under Country 1 free speech and other laws.

Country 2 declares said content 'harmful'. Makes the provision by Content provider A illegal.

A citizen of anywhere, but to keep things simple, lets say of Country 2, entirely of their own volition accesses the content provided by Content provider A. And gets found out.

So, er - what? And let's ignore calling VPN providers accessories for now.

1: Country 2 takes Content provider A to court for being Bad People(tm) and breaking their law?

2: Country 2 says accessing any content provided from regions not under Country 2's legal jurisdiction is a Bad Thing(tm) and firewalls themselves from the world?

3: Something else equally stupid?

I'm not suggesting there is no content available I personally would consider a Bad Thing(tm). But to assume my own values should apply to everybody? To make access to such content the fault of content providers, who simply offer an option to access, and not consider it purely the fault of those who in _fact_ access it? Hmmm. With extra 'here we go again'. Sigh...

Brit comms regulator Ofcom: Disabled left behind by tech


Re: What counts as 'disabled'?

You have me _every_ sympathy. Offered sincerely and genuinely - from experience.

I apologise to those for whom what follows is TMI. Feel free not to read further. But my own wife has Primary Progressive MS. She is fully wheelchair bound, has a colostomy for solid waste and an indwelling catheter for liquid waste, one _I_ have to maintain and replace as a result of cuts to care funding. She is losing the use of her hands and her voice volume is dropping. I still work full time and I'm also her sole carer. I'm in tech, and tech should be a savior for someone whose computer is her sole window on the world. Does it help? Sure. Has the available help changed much in the past ten years she's been chair bound? Not so much. And lord knows I've tried most of what's available. Head mice? Yes. Dragon? Yes. Crossed fingers and hope I don;t come home to find she's finally given up and OD-d? So yes I can't say it loud enough.

AC, whoever you are, you have my every sympathy - and my hope that, gamer though I am, the tech world takes a little of its eye off a gazillion core cpu with graphics to show the atoms in a hair on the Bad Guy's face - and opens the world to those who have no window to look through but a computer screen.

Jeep hacking lawsuit shifts into gear for trial after US Supremes refuse to hit the brakes



... don't buy network connected vehicles? Software will always have flaws, flaws will always be found, found flaws will always be used by someone at some time.

More nodding dogs green-light terrible UK.gov pr0n age verification plans


Re: So...

"Are children being exposed to naughty audio on a regular basis?"

Only if they want to spend five (all numbers made up, as per Internet standards) minutes looking for it and like it when they find it. A bit like drugs, gambling, the lyrics to the latest single by some artist I'm probably far too old to ever want to know, the price of an iphone, the road to Fiddlers Green...

Er, OK. Forget that last one. I'm showing my age. Or something... (blush)

I'll go back to the beginning. Only if they want to spend five (all numbers made up, as per Intern et standards) minutes looking for it and like it when they find it. And so far, the world hasn't ended.

A Christmas classic: Cloudera founder asks staff to stay another day


A small...

... amendment:

"In cases where we must terminate positions (which, of course won't be, like, _ours_, as we're, like, _important_, not like you), we will put reasonable (from the perspective of our accountants, and, more importantly, the bonus I'm going to get after this) plans, including severance packages (because some bloody stupid laws say we sort of have to, but we're spending a really, really large amount of money on lawyers to see if we can get out of it), in place to ease the transition for those affected (which is us, not you. After all, you'll be gone, and we'll still be here)."

European fibre lobby calls for end to fake fibre broadband ads


Re: Cogito ergo sum?

I'm pretty sure (read: absolutely totally sure, 'cos I watched them run the fibre down the corridor). But then, I'm in Canada, and in a condo tower that has a provider with fibre to the apartment as an option (as well as other providers serving the tower who offer cable and other technologies). I would suggest a qualification, whether geographic or otherwise, to the hook line might be in order :-). I'll try to be nice and not mention my symetric, uncapped service - or the cost. Or, um, rather the 'lack' of significant cost :-))). Oh, alright. 250Mbps for $50 a month. I could have 1Gbps if I felt like shelling a whole $100 a month...

Gigabit? More like, you can gigabet the US will fall behind on super-fast broadband access


But... but...

... that nice, friendly Mr Pai said everything was going great!

"“Today’s report confirms that the FCC’s policies to promote broadband deployment are working, After Internet service providers reduced new investments in 2015 and 2016 under the prior Administration’s regulatory approach, broadband investment increased in 2017 by $1.5 billion over the previous year.”

Right. 2%. That'll fix it, yes? Oh - was that before or _after_ factoring in inflation, and the fact that the US was already _behind_ lots of other places? Sigh...

Windows 10 Pro goes Home as Microsoft fires up downgrade server


Re: The joke is on you!

My cat likes windows. She sits and stares out of the at the traffic twenty-five floors below and smiles ot herself. She watches the rain on them and, I'm sure, snuggles inside, remembering when she was a street cat out in the cold and rain before she was rescued - _before_ she had windows. On the other hand she was sort of unix-ed after her first litter (is a neutered female a eunixed one?), so I guess she has the best of both ways of operating... :-).

SQLite creator crucified after code of conduct warns devs to love God, and not kill, commit adultery, steal, curse...


Re: I have a code of conduct

With respect, the only issue with your one liner is it's self-breaching. By telling other people not to do something you're telling them (trying to tell them) how to behave, which the line itself forbids...



Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020