Stack ranking.
It'll make little difference if management as still "stack ranking" their employees.
264 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jul 2007
It's not just about propulsion and the kind of speeds you can reach though, is it. The faster you go, the more energy gets imparted when you impact something. Travel at even small fractions of light speed and a dust particle hitting you could blow your equipment up in a brilliant flash of light.
So, as there's a significant lag between committing the transaction in memory and writing it to disk, if your instance crashes, all of those transactions are lost. Sounds more like a method for caching stuff you don't really care about all that much, rather than some important improvement here.
I actually like Win 8. OK, I don't spend ANY time in Metro, except very occasionally when I have to search for something. But that's rare because all of my stuff is in shortcuts on my task bar (grouped). I've got about 120 items down there.
There are some things in desktop Win 8 that are quite nice, including the new task manager.
I have McAfee at work, and have used Norton at home. The former is a resource hog and I hate it. The latter is even more of a resource hog and naturally I hate it even more.
I'm prepared to accept a 0.003% risk, assuming I don't often click on dodgy links, if it means I'm able to actually use my machine as I want without the AV getting in the way. That is why I love MSE so much.
So screw the AV test. I don't trust it.
"Dark Matter is pretty well established by observation and detailed computer simulation"
Eh? That isn't true at all. All we know if that certain things deviate from Relativity and that we call what causes this "dark matter". We then tweak our equations to find out what its mass must be, all the time assuming relativity is correct.
There's absolutely no observational evidence for it at all. Indeed, models have shown that it should be fairly evenly spread around our own galaxy, but absolutely no evidence for its effects can be seen in our vicinity. I don't call bullshit on it, but I think it's a bit of a long-shot.
How is a quasar a "dying galaxy"? Given that we're seeing them when they were extremely young, I would have thought they should be called new galaxies?
Let me speculate: They spew matter out into the Universe. At some point they become dormant, like ours is.
There. Quackery balance achieved.
I never needed to root a device in my life. Yes, if you need or want to do that, the Fire is almost certainly the wrong product. When it comes to reviewing the device for what it's designed to do and for the kind of people it's designed to be used by however, I think this review is more honest:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00tmliWHDZw
I've bought one of these for my girlfriend for Christmas. She will use it for reading, browsing the web and a few other things (maybe Skype). She's unlikely to want to do anything other than that, ever. For the price it seems excellent value. I have an iPad (the £700 64GB) and I've got to say it was a complete waste of money when I think what I actually use it for compared to what I imagined I'd use it for when I bought it.
It's no good reviewing something as if the target market was a tech-head or nerdy type who comes to El Reg, when it's about as far away from that as possible.
It's crowd-sourced funding. I kicked in £20, so I can reserve my commander name in-game. No idea if it will be a success but I'm curious to see it. I see all of the £3000 + donation slots were filled (dinner with the Dev team).
So thumbs up to this now. Although I'll probably be in my mid-40's by the time it's released.
(1) I've used Microsoft Security Essentials for years now and it's brilliant. Totally non-intrusive. high performance, free and AS GOOD AS the paid for versions (don't trust rankings just from googling). I have McAfee at work and it's TERRIBLE for machine performance. So why does this article say MSE is good for a "free" anti-virus? The only difference I can see between MSE and paid-for is the exchange of money and some processes on your machine that are going to eat the CPU, memory and disk performance.
(2) I've had Windows 8 for a few days now and I can say it's pretty good. I spend 99.9% of my time at the desktop and the experience is almost exactly the same as Windows 7, except for quite a few improvements like the new Task Manager, copy file progress dialog and so on. At £25 for the upgrade it was a bargain.
How many times do you use the word "small", "tiny", "smallest" and so on without once giving us an idea of scale. How about you use the unit `dinner plate'. Tell us how small small is for a tarantula as a proportion of a dinner plate. 1 ground dwelling tarantula being one dinner plate, is one of these little critters 1/10th of a dinner plate? 1/1000th? 1/2?
What?
I'm none the wiser.
There's a solution: Simply bring an asteroid into orbit around the Earth to block out the Sun.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2210798/Global-warming-combatted-asteroid-dust-acting-like-sunshade-earth-scientists-say.html
, from exquisitely stupid scientists at the University of Strathclyde. Motto: Doing our best to destroy public trust in Science.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist, preferring the cock-up/Human Nature theory. However this phrase gave me pause:
"(which means it’s survived the peer-review process)"
The reason it gives me pause is because there's a bit of a myth that peer review is somehow aids progress and guarantees that the study contains an element of truth. This is wrong. All it means is that the study has gained the acceptance of other people who do the same kind of studies, in the same kind of way (the Paradigm).
I find Lehrer instructive in this instance:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/12/13/101213fa_fact_lehrer
I just missed out on the Java craze at University by a year or so. Our OO Professor was so old fashioned (he wanted to teach us OO concepts, not the Latest Thing) we did all of our OO in a language called Eiffel. Pity that didn't take off.
Anyway, as Win32/MFC/C++ and C#/.NET developer, my most recent experience of Java was trying to do something utterly banal involving generics. I was shocked to see that after over a decade of development, Java still does not properly/correctly support templates/generics. Or rather it tries to, but it's a cack-handed, awful implementation. C++ and C# blow it away.
Why would anyone want to use it?
You're an idiot if you interpret the graph as "should now go down, rather than sharply up" (not that it is going "sharply up"). As the graph has been on average going up since the Little Ice Age, at what point do you think it suddenly started being about CO2? As far as I can see, it has never been about CO2. Moreover, CO2 is PLANT FOOD, not a pollutant. The biosphere is starved of CO2 at the moment. What a wonderful side-effect this is of Human ingenuity: Feeding plants.
Can I just point out that there's a MASSIVE BIAS in favour of the AGW hypothesis in the mainstream media and political class in certain countries (mostly Europe and parts of the US). Everywhere else AGW gets the skeptical treatment it deserves, i.e. people think it's a load of old bollocks.
Now here's some bona fide EVIDENCE that it is bollocks, not that we need any because we all know about the Vostok cores, right? Oh, you don't? Well here's a graph that will give you a hard-on:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Vostok-ice-core-petit.png
Shocking, isn't it? Skeptics have been saying all along that current temperatures and trends are well within the bounds of natural variation. Well, now you have TWO ACTUAL DATA SETS TO LOOK AT. But I bet you don't. I bet you continue to look at the output of your models, as if they somehow have greater validity than the empirical evidence.
Pathetic.
I think you misunderstand the "hockey stick". The stick was generated from analysis (incorrect analysis) of proxies through medieval times up until the present day. The last few hundred years were "spliced" onto the graph from thermometer data, not the proxies. Combine the poor analysis with the splicing and you end up with a hockey stick. Muller has not "independently verified it" in any shape or form. All he's done is analyse the surface temperature record, which itself shows NOAA adjustments add 100% to the warming. He totally fails to understand what this means. His paper was rejected in peer review. His arguments about attribution are spurious, because he hasn't done any attribution analysis whatsoever.
Yes, yes, but let's look at just one proxy here:
http://stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/screenhunter_43-jul-28-20-17.jpg
How many hockey-sticks do you want? And what does this chart mean to you? Go on... I dare you... interpret it for us.
Switch me to Linux? Here's a list of programs I run on my Windows 7 box:
(1) Steam
(2) Office
(3) Adobe Master Suite
(4) Visual Studio 2010
(5) Google Chrome/Newsleecher/Vuze
(6) 3D Studio 2010
(7) Solidworks
(8) SQL Server 2008
(9) Windows Media Player
I can live without 3, there's a Linux alternative to 2 (although not as shiny), there's a Linux alternative to 4, there are Linux versions of 5, 6 would be hard to live without I think... flaky enough on Windows 7, 7 would be impossible, 8 can be replaced with an OSS alternative, 9 I don't know much about Codecs and what plays on what.
But... I've got over £1,000 worth of games in my Steam library. There's no way I'm switching from 7 if I can't play them in Linux. I wouldn't want to lose out in performance from doing so either (Wine).
So, if Newell can pull this off I don't mind jumping ship. Even though I can't stand Balmer, I think Windows 7 is pretty good.
No. The problem is that the environment does not remain static. You might site a station in a field and 25 years later that station is in the middle of an airport or a large town, and is far hotter. The question is how to adjust the temperature to take this into account?
Surprisingly people like James Hansen have been doing this for a very long time. They mostly revised up recent temperatures and revised down past temperatures, to exaggerate the trend. What Watts et al has done is show using modern techniques that at least half of the warming trend is spurious.
I'm aware of people's dislike of change. Something like a PC desktop is kind-of sacred and MS are being VERY brave changing it. They want to eat some of Apple's lunch and that means slate, phone, laptop and the all important APP STORE.
I tried 8 and it sucked to be honest. I'll stick with 7 until I can no longer avoid 8 due to technological change :). Actually that might not be too long as I'm a Software Developer so it's going to be very difficult for me to avoid 8.