Sue whichever company has the most money
"Samsung repeatedly said that this was mostly their suppliers' problem,"
Unfortunately their suppliers don't have nearly as much money.
419 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Sep 2013
Steam tracks the number of hours played for each game in your library.
If these records show that you have been playing the game for more than an hour, then your claim that the game does not work would be weak. If however you were not able to launch it (faulty goods - not fit for purpose) then your claim would be much stronger. In that case they should grant a refund in keeping with Australian law (and presumably disable the game in your library).
The fact that they do not already do this for all their customers reflects badly on them.
The security clearance is not tied to employment, so termination of employment does not revoke security clearance. What does happen is that a security pass is handed in, but that only happens as part of manual employment termination procedures. Since employment was not meant to have ended, those manual procedures would not have been carried out. Possession of the pass would have enabled continued entry, regardless of employment status.
Of some relevance is the announcement that popular game engine maker Unity will be supporting WebGL as a target for 2D and 3D games developed using its IDE:
http://blogs.unity3d.com/2014/04/29/on-the-future-of-web-publishing-in-unity/
Here is an example of a game built in Unity and published to WebGL:
http://beta.unity3d.com/jonas/DT2/
(Don't forget to press escape at the start to dismiss modal message. Otherwise you'll die. Currently supported browsers for this content are Firefox and Chrome 35)
maybe Scotland would consider becoming part of the Australian federation. We invited the Kiwis, but they have this thing about ex convicts. Or possibly they're just jealous because we have more sheep.
We admire the Scots' outstanding achievements in the fields of alcohol consumption and fried foods - the most outstanding example of which is the fried Mars Bar.
A lot of Bad Things can be prevented by imposing onerous restrictions on our freedom. We could save thousands of lives by engineering cars to be unable to exceed 30 KPH. We could prevent a great deal of violence by abolishing alcohol. We could prevent a lot of diseases like type II diabetes by abolishing fast food outlets and banning the sale of junk food. We could reduce terrorism by spying on everyone. None of these are good ideas.
The International E-Sports Federation originally had entirely separate contests for men and women, with one set of games for men and a different, smaller set of games for women. Thus women were prevented from competing in some popular games. In reaction to the resultant outcry, they made the male competition open to everyone. They could also have dropped the female competition, but chose not to. In any case, it is an improvement over the previous situation.
- performance (generated object code is fast)
- deterministic resource use
- direct access to low level hardware
- you can find a C compiler for the vast majority of embedded devices
- the runtime and generated executable are small
Keep in mind that there are far more embedded devices running C code than desktops running anything else.
Or illegitimate love child of Far Cry 3 and Grand Theft Auto. Whatever it is, it is a lot of fun. Sure, the UI sucks on a PC, and I sometimes accidentally draw my gun in public when pressing the middle mouse button, but I can live with that. It adds spice to the game. Some have had problems with stuttering, but fortunately I haven't (admittedly I have a Titan). Like Far Cry 3, you have the equivalent of towers and outposts, both of which have to be conquered to reveal game aspects for a particular area. Like Grand Theft Auto, you can pull people out of their cars and drive recklessly with little or no consequence (although you can lose points for running over civilians).
I guess I'm in a minority when I prefer the vehicle control scheme of Borderlands, which uses analogue input from the mouse to steer instead of digital input from the A and D keys. In fact, given that the cars don't have guns, they could have used the left and right mouse buttons instead of W and S when driving.
Is it the start of a franchise? Maybe. It worked for Grand Theft Auto, but I get the feeling that in this game they were unsure that they had compelling content and threw a whole bunch of different side quests against a wall and are watching to see what sticks.
Still, overall, I think it is worth buying.
I read that, then glanced across at my other screen where I am downloading the 40.7 GB Wolfenstein: The New Order, which according to Steam should be done in 3 days.
Next week's download will be Watchdogs. I wonder how big that will be?
Yes, but weren't Microsoft fond of claiming that IE was heavily integrated into the OS and could not be separated?
"Microsoft has held that this is not meaningful; that in Windows 98 and newer versions, "Internet Explorer" is not a separate piece of software but simply a brand name for the web browsing and HTML rendering capacities of the Windows operating system. In this view, the result of removing IE is simply a damaged Windows system; to have a working system without IE one must replace Windows entirely."
- from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_Internet_Explorer
There is a balance here, and perhaps society should make a collective decision.
One one hand there is the freedom of passengers in cars, trains, etc. to use their mobile phones without restriction. On the other we have the death, injury and associated personal and societal costs of accidents caused by drivers being distracted by mobile phones.
Automatically disabling the transmitters and receivers in mobile phones that are travelling more than, say 30 kph is trivially easy, and would without doubt save lives. The question is whether the convenience of passengers is more important than human life.