* Posts by matt747

5 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Aug 2013

Giffgaff 'roam like at home' package means £1/min calls in Jersey

matt747

Re: in jersey just connect to french provider

Not true I'm afraid. You can (usually) only get a French network when on the north-east/east coast. My parents visit from Oz occasionally and Telstra have no reciprocal with JT, therefore their phones won't register with the local network. Once, they needed to receive a text with an authentication code - it took

nearly an hour of driving around the north coast in order to connect to a French network.

'Impossible' EmDrive flying saucer thruster may herald new theory of inertia

matt747

Re: Impossible EmDrive Thruster

Infinitely so....

matt747

Re: question

Was it the late, great Iain M. Banks?

HALF of air passengers leave phones on ... yet STILL no DEATH PLUNGE

matt747

Re: Not just radio signal safety

don't you mean cabin crew not flight crew?

matt747

Ok.

So there are a lot of people on here posting (at best) conjecture.

I am an airline pilot with 16 years professional experience and in excess of 10,000 hours (mostly at the helm of a 747).

I can categorically say that mobiles CAN and DO interfere with aircraft systems.

In my personal experience, it has been limited to radio transmissions and reception. The interference sounds exactly the same as holding your phone up to an unshielded speaker.

I have only ever noticed this whilst flying smaller, older aircraft. I'm guessing that it was more noticeable due to the proximity of 'phone to aircraft RF antenna, and also due to the older aircraft RF shielding being of a lower standard. Personally, I have never experienced any interference with aircraft navigation/non RF systems though. However, that is not to say that it doesn't/couldn't occur.

To be honest though, radio (comms) interference is bad enough - the pilots could easily miss a vital instruction/readback from ATC - at high OR low altitude.

There is (correctly) some talk of phones and devices being TOTALLY off for take off and landing. This is, as suggested by some, to ensure that passengers are distracted as little as possible and therefore stand the greatest chance of surviving an evacuation should the worst occur - the vast majority of aircraft accidents occur during the take off and landing phase. This has nothing to do with interference and everything to do best practice - aviation is the safest form of transport in the world for a reason; tried and tested procedures and attention to detail.

As a sub-note, some airlines are introducing low power base stations/femtocells onboard aircraft that connect to ground cell networks via satellite. These are, of course, fine as the aircraft and systems in question have been checked and correctly shielded.

My advice:

Newer aircraft = less likely to be a problem

Follow advice of the crew.

If in doubt, keep your phone in flight mode.

Cheers