Re: Or just
Well, they're still drones, i.e. remote piloted by a human, not robots, but it's a sound plan.
1921 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jul 2013
"GIVE US URE PHONE NUMBER! U CAN TRUST US!"
Like hell.
Well, Google's been doing it for ages, it was only a matter of time until Yahoo decided they needed to sell ads to phones too.
Thing is, I don't need secure. Anyone could hack my gmail or yahoo or facebook or TheRegister accounts, and I couldn't care less, so having to jump hoops for a "strong" protection I don't need is really fucking annoying.
> I don't remember reading anything about that in the news
Here's an article in the New York Times.
It's long been known that the Chinese government track(ed?) people through airport wifi and also used it to infect travelers with spyware, and I would be surprised if not many other governments, including the UK, Russia, France and Iran, had done this as well -- it's an obvious and risk-free way to access businessmen's & official's computers.
> Their next batch of test subjects
...are not examples of this, and there is zero reason to think they would be.
The ISS was never built to do science, and god knows it's done precious little of any value, but that's just all the more reason for media to NOT breathlessly repeat every inanity NASA releases.
> Do you have the details of any papers which would back this assertion up?
Yeah, tons. It's not like it's hard to subject seeds to radiation, or like wasn't a big research subject in the 50's. There's even some characteristically pedestrian crap from the ISS: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1022795407080066
> You have obviously never worked with any sort of space based plant research --- small variations in the concentrations of chemicals in the plants and their seeds/fruits can turn something which is perfectly harmless (and quite tasty) on Earth into something quite poisonous in space.
Give me ONE single example of this.
> produce strains of plants which can grow (and multiply---) in zero gravity
If billed as such, i.e. straight-up product development, then the "research" might have had some merit -- but what's in reality is more pedestrian junk science from the long line of pedestrian junk science produced by the ISS is billed as important food-safety research.
> Radiation could have damaged the dna of the plants.
No, not really.
> Micro-gravity could have affected how they grow.
It does affect how they grow, but it does not make them toxic.
> There's a whole bunch of things to consider like how much water they need. How fertiliser affects growth rate etc etc.
There really isn't anything of interest there -- the basic physiology of the plant hasn't changed -- and certainly there is nothing wrt the safety of the plant.
If the research had been aimed at developing the technology then it might have had some merit, but the safety of the produce? Junk science.
> The Irish economy is doing fine without a respirator
No, it isn't. It's held under the arms by EU subsidies and EU special rules allowing it to offer golden deals to non-EU companies to set up shop (and pay very little tax) in Ireland.
There isn't a country in the union which should love the EU as Ireland.
> As I recall a tiny, windowed version of Doom did appear on the Amiga
I don't know if Doom was ever released on the Amiga, but a few 3D shooter clones were -- however, they had to "cheat" pretty heavily to get acceptable framerates (like only rendering the top or bottom half of the environment and then mirroring it). The ones I saw were impressive from a programming point of view but ultimately did little but highlight that 3D gaming was not a job the Amiga was suited for.
> How did it do this?
Good artists, good programmers, lots of dithering and the blurring effect of CRT screens. HAM-mode (4096 colors) was too slow to be used in most games, and the ECS chipsed didn't support 8-bit mode (256 colors), so various tricks were used to make the ECS chipsets 32 colors seem a lot more.
The Amiga held its own pretty well. The Amiga games clearly had prettier graphics than PC games, even though the PC had started sporting 8-bit graphics, up until the 3D games came. The Amiga evolved far slower than the PC and did not have the horsepower to run games like Doom and Tomb Raider, and this led to its death.
I could only play Speedball for like 15 minutes before I had to take a break because I had built up so much rage I was one missed shot from pounding the joystick and keyboard to pieces. Not bad rage, not like being ganked by a cheating 12-year-old in Counterstrike, but fun, wholesome, berserker rage. So I kept going back.
Can't recall ever having played any other game which had that effect.
> I'll answer that for you: no. Torture isn't "right". I thought this was a position that we could all get behind...
I'd hold that there is a difference between torture and punishment, and that incarceration is no picnic either.
The guy in the article had walked along a row of parked cars and smashed their windscreens, for fun. I would hazard a guess that the owners of those cars would be more likely to feel justice had been served after this caning than if he'd been given fines, or a couple of weeks in juvenile detention.
The perpetrator clearly didn't enjoy the caning, but on the other hand he recovered in a week, and I wonder if he's not less likely to offend again than he'd have been if locked up with other minor criminals for some weeks?
Seems like a pretty good outcome to me.
>The people on the bank notes are those who have made a significant contribution to the country/society.
Darwin and Watt sure, but John Houblon?
I'd put Jane Austen or Millicent Fawcett (women's right to vote movement) way above Houblon in the "contribution to society" category.
> Unlike these charming feminists, you mean?
There are feminists who are rabid asshats, I've never said otherwise. I said that I have never seen a single "Men's Rights" activist who wasn't.
Another poster suggested it's like with libertarians, that it's just the online Men's Rightists who are mental. That is possible, but even if offline Men's Rightists are normal and well-adjusted, it doesn't change that the online ones take bigotry and hate to a level rarely seen outside Stormfront.
> jail is rarely the appropriate punishment for one-off and non-violent crime, but we do need something simple and easy to deal with utter dickheads
I've often wondered if maybe Singapore doesn't have it right. I may be a heartless fiend, but to me it seems a better response to minor-but-not-trivial crimes than short jailtime or high fines.
As in "application specific"? Can they really be repurposed as general code-cracking machines?
As for the graphics cards, nVidia and AMD both cripple their floating point maths performance because they want to sell their (much pricier) computing cards which use the same chips. That is, even if nVidia Titan got so common that second hand prices were forced down, it's not really all that hot when it comes to cracking codes.
EDIT: Also I'm not at all sure there are all that many miners compared to gamers. But what do I know.
> Perhaps this will move things from Windows based platforms for games
That's the idea. Since Microsoft intends to close Windows for distributors like Valve and Origin, those distributors are trying to get gaming to switch to Linux. That's what this is about, that's what the whole SteamOS and SteamBox thing is about.
> Valve have managed to create a system where their "subscribers" have paid retail price for products that can be removed from their use tomorrow
I've been a Steam user since it was released ten years ago. Haven't lost a game yet.
> M$ restricting WinRT applications to M$'s app store
That's the whole point of the Microsoft Store: Microsoft takes 30% commission for every item sold, and the plan was/is to force all software to be sold through it. That's why Valve developed SteamOS to begin with: Microsoft's plan would kill distributors like Valve.
> He admits he has had a free ride up until now but is unwilling to support his old mentor
I have no idea what you think you're saying here.
> the "games" industry hardware and software seem to be chasing their tail atm as people do not seem to be buying into the "quick! upgrade your hardware to run the latest M$ OS so your kids can play X"
It's not a case of "people not buying in to it", it's a case of there being zero reason to upgrade. There isn't a single game which requires Windows 8 to run, and since all PC games are written for console (8 years old hardware) then ported to PC, the hardware of a five year old PC can run all present titles. Games no longer push PC hardware evolution.
> a return to open OS and hardware computer innovation
There was innovation and variety in computers in the early days because the technology wasn't mature. You see the same kind of pattern with any new technology: tons of companies with unique solutions, then gradually the market gets consolidated, and eventually you have one clear winner + one or a few niche players. It's what happened with cars, it's what happened on PC, and it's happened with mobile devices. And there's no going back.
He seems a genuinely good guy, sincere and intent on dragging the church into the 21st century, and has in a short while done a lot of good things, from kicking out hundreds of pedophile priests and fighting corruption in the Vatican to furthering the cause of women in the church. He's worlds better than any of the recent popes, and that includes the arch-conservative and bafflingly popular John Paul II.
If he keeps this up I may have to stop disliking the catholic church.
Both are distressingly common in science, I'd estimate that in my field somewhere between 20-40% of all published articles are junk. In this particular case, considering that these two guys were PhD students, I think it's a case of Baby's First Publication.
That students publish junk isn't really their fault, they're learning and still don't really know what they're doing, the real fault lies with their supervisor, who should have supervised, coached and advised them, and with the reviewers, who should have rejected publication.
> Scientists who write books accessible to a wider non-scientific audience are doing a good job in "spreading the word"
Absolutely. They're needed to counteract the constant stream of 'Dancing Wu-Li Masters' type pseudo-science. The criticism that those writing the best books aren't necessarily the best scientists in their fields completely misses the point.
> I wonder if slapping a new idea into a major cosmological theory like you are welding up a hole in a Lancia's subframe could be referred to as "good science"
That's exactly what "good science" is. That's what progress looks like.
I suspect people get confused about what is good science and what (and how) science is covered in mainstream media -- there is an overlap, but it's not big.