Dear Doctor,
Since no-one else likes Clara could you drop her off at my house when you're finished with her?
Cheers.
218 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jul 2013
Throw out your biggest brand name, essentially your identity, great plan!
MS just need to recognise that mobile and desktop are different and reinstate the desktop features from Windows 7. Then they need to tell everyone that it ISN'T Windows 8.
Instead they want to nail a stake in the heart of their business.
I think you're wrong about this because the BBC tells me every day that everything is hunky-dory and that we're better together?
More seriously at the start of the article you say that economics is broken and fails to spot problems because it is not a correct model and then say at the end that we should teach kids economic principles. Doesn't make sense. I agree with teaching them history though and how economists (largely) failed to point out the impending problems.
Also as Novex referred to a lot of people didn't start working for themselves. They said they were doing that so they could get working tax credits without being hassled and sanctioned by the Job Centre in order to get their job seekers' allowance pittance.
@Nuke: Yes, I understand that. I'm just pointing out the laziness of Lars' post. I've worked places where IT were in charge of the whole process end-to-end, others where they selected the kit but Procurement/Finance made the purchase/tender and still others where, like you say, where IT select the items but have to use preferred suppliers.
With this sort of variability you can't draw many conclusions from the study/article which doesn't clarify the situation.
No need for the facepalm.
@LarsG: What a load of rubbish. You could easily flip those comments around. Banks have IT departments, maybe the IT departments are in charge of the purchases, maybe they're the lazy, thieving gits? See? As Terry 6 says the article/research lacks too much information to do anything but draw lazy conclusions as you've done.
Seriously, I wonder how many truly damaging cyber attacks really take place? Info Sec professionals get all hot under the collar about hackers, lather on about Stuxnet but the amount of truly damaging attacks that take place seem minimal outside some high profile cases (RSA, etc).
It's almost as if there's an industry to support.
Steve Todd: Yes, as you describe this type of situation would only work at badly organised institutions. In most places payments are set up by the customer or the customer service team taking a phone call/responding to a written instruction via the customer database/mainframe/whatever. The actual batch of payments would be relayed to and sent separately via a different application (Faster Payments, BACS or Chaps) by a different team with their own passwords for that application.
It would be extremely unlikely that from the transmission mechanism ('wire transfer application' as the article terms it) would be integrated with the customer database/mainframe in such a way that you could choose individual customer accounts and the amount of money you want to steal.
You could perhaps steal money from the bank's own accounts. Even that seems unlikely.
I don't think that's what Star Trek refers to. I think the technical manual refers to taking people apart atom by atom and I'm sure the neurotic character Reginald Barclay (and perhaps some other character) refer to not wanting to be taken apart.
I agree though the alternative is some sort of wormhole/manipulation of space-time which doesn't rely on the data side of things.